To: george76; Clintonfatigued; Kuksool; darkangel82; AuH2ORepublican
Crank and his folks are looking like major-league sore losers here. We just don’t need this internecine battle right now. Lamborn may have some shortcomings, but we need to come together and put aside the hard feelings for the good of this district.
7 posted on
10/05/2007 11:02:54 AM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: fieldmarshaldj
Crank, what an appropriate name.
8 posted on
10/05/2007 11:05:35 AM PDT by
darkangel82
(All right! Let's go Tribe!!)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Crank and his folks are looking like major-league sore losers here. We just don’t need this internecine battle right now. Lamborn may have some shortcomings, but we need to come together and put aside the hard feelings for the good of this district. Who's this "we", kemo sabe? Did you recently move here from Tennessee?
It's amusing: folks always say that the time for Republicans to challenge Republicans is in the primaries. Well, they're doing that, and Lamborn has made it worth their while to do so.
I didn't vote for Lamborn last time, and I'm not inclined to do so this time, either.
15 posted on
10/05/2007 1:50:47 PM PDT by
r9etb
To: fieldmarshaldj; colorado tanker; jan in Colorado
Crank and Rayburn might be able to unseat the flaky Doug Lamborn in a two-candidate contest, but with both running, the anti-Lamborn vote will be hopelessly split. Lamborn is guaranteed another term now.
23 posted on
10/05/2007 4:09:27 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson