Posted on 10/05/2007 6:40:26 PM PDT by Kaslin
Here is a blog review of “An Inconvenient Truth” that rips its (non)credibility to shreds:
Detailed Comments on An Inconvenient Truth
http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/detailed-comments-on-an-inconvenient-truth/
You: I don’t get your “just ask Israel”
It was sarcasm
“In a situation currently marked by threats of the use of power, Carter has stood by principles that conflicts must as far as possible be resolved through mediation and international co-operation based on international law, respect for human rights, and economic development.”
The announcement which the Norwegian Nobel Committee usually makes in October explains the basis of its choice for the award, and it is the only document about the reasons for its decision which the Committee as a whole approves for publication. It was rumored that this time the Committee had worked hard to reach agreement. The final paragraph of the statement referred to a long held position of Jimmy Carter, but the phrase “in a situation currently marked by threats of the use of power” could be welcomed by critics of the Iraq policy of President Bush, who was at that time getting Congressional support for the use of force, if necessary.
Could be a lock-in for Gore, though, and a perfect time for him to announce he’s running in ‘08.
I’ve fantasized on other threads, Gore-Kerry (based on JFK’s statements). What could be more compelling than an opportunity to undo the terrible injustice of the last two stolen elections, and be able to save the planet as well, with one vote!
Throw Hillary! in there, and you could have the first American triumvirate, and undo the injustice of Bill’s impeachment!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.