Skip to comments.Survey: Male gay teachers abuse most
Posted on 10/12/2007 8:01:24 AM PDT by yankeesdoodle
A survey of news stories in seven English-speaking countries conducted by the Family Research Institute shows that incidents of teacher-pupil sex are most often perpetrated by male homosexual teachers. Overall, 43 percent of teachers who made the news for having sex with their pupils over the last 27 years were homosexual.
Homosexual teachers violated 1,925 (56 percent) of the 3,457 pupil-victims. Women were 11 percent of perpetrators, but a heterosexual female teacher was least apt to have sex with pupils, Christian Newswire reported Thursday.
Lexis-Nexis was searched from 1980 through 2006 uncovering 902 teachers who had sex with pupils. Teachers who engaged in homosexuality constituted 63 percent of perpetrators in Ireland, 62 percent in New Zealand, 60 percent in Canada, 54 percent in Scotland, 48 percent in Australia, 47 percent in England and 35 percent in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at religionandspirituality.com ...
They’re only doing it at school because they’re not allowed to be parents.
There’s a shock.....
Wow. Considering they make up around 2-4% of the population at large, these are huge numbers.
"Hey, I resemble that remark."
"Hey, I resemble that remark."
First paragraph - "43 percent of teachers who made the news for having sex with their pupils over the last 27 years were homosexual."
Must be the new math.
"Gay Adoption and Parental Choice" In some states, gay couples can adopt children.
Gay male teachers and young boy students. Kind of like the fox in the hiney house.
Allowing homosexuals to teach children is like having alcoholic bartenders.
Bears repeating. 2-5% are committing 56% of the known offenses!
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
So much for the school boy fantasies.
“Must be the new math.” mtbopfuyn
You have a point only if 43% or more of the teachers are gay. If only 5% or less of teachers are gay, then 5% of the teacher population is committing 43% of the offenses (35% in the U.S.A.).
What is missing from this study is an accurate picture of the numbers of teachers of each sex vs. the numbers of students of each sex. That would be a much harder study to do, and would not be available from public records such as this study used.
For instance, is there more male-to-male or female-to-female sex in sex-segregated schools, where the teachers are also of the same sex?
The study says that the incidence of homosexual male sex is least in Africa and Asia — is that because there is a greater taboo, because females are more devalued by society, or because there are greatly more female teachers than male teachers than in Europe and the U.S.?
It would be interesting to know.
Once again, it goes back to the obvious, but definitely un-researched, fact that homosexuals are far more likely to have both physical and psychological abnormalities unrelated, but possibly associated, with their sexuality, than heterosexuals.
In other words, their abnormalities are not *caused* by their homosexuality, but are independent of it, unless they assume or choose to intertwine the two.
Ironically, this leaves a lot of homosexuals walking around with treatable physical and mental conditions, because the assumption is that they are either part of their homosexuality, or as a consequence of their homosexuality.
The reason that it is un-researched is probably based in fear that if homosexuals are discovered to have a far higher percentage of abnormalities in their bodies and minds, that it will somehow be used as an excuse to despise them further.
But as it is, it just results in a lot of untreated suffering on their part, yet again ironically, suffering that would not be alleviated even if they accomplished their agenda.
As far as society as a whole is concerned, however, until these individuals who especially have psychological problems are treated for those problems, they are, and should be scrutinized, as much as anyone else with untreated psychological problems. It is not because they are homosexual, it is because they have some degree of untreated mental illness.
...Though there are scientific journals that publish some empirical studies and reviews about human SS [same-sex desires and/or behavior], no journal is solely dedicated to its empirical study. The Empirical Journal of Same-Sex Sexual Behavior (EJSSB) aims to fill this void.
EJSSB was conceptualized by Dr. Paul Cameron and Dr. George Rekers in late 2006. Both felt that a pall of censorship had descended upon academia, and an unbiased peer-reviewed journal editorially, neither dedicated to, nor in opposition to, gay rights was needed. A clear illustration of this censorship occurred in the on-line version of Pediatrics. When Drs. Paul and Kirk Cameron first submitted Problems With Pawelski, et als Article on the Well-Being of Children of Homosexuals to Pediatrics (aappublications.org/cgi/eletters/118/1/349, 2006), it was published immediately and remained on the website for a couple of months. A member of the American Academy of Pediatrics submitted another critique and it too was published briefly. Both then disappeared. After multiple attempts to get these articles reinstated as per the claimed policy of Pediatrics it became clear that inclusion of facts not in accord with the pro-gay rights stance of the journal... would not be permitted. This kind of censorship is diametrically opposed to what science and free inquiry are all about. Further, in this instance, professionals dealing with children were exposed to a one-sided, prohomosexual set of poor research. Not telling the whole truth has consequences for any society.
Being empirical rather than theoretical, studies published in EJSSB will generally use descriptive rather than diagnostic or political language....
Why EJSSB is Different
Many journals such as those of the American Psychological and Sociological Associations take an advocacy role regarding SS, refusing to publish papers that might be construed as injuring the progress of the gay movement. Others, such as Pediatrics, publish reviews of parenting by those who engage in SS, but present one side of the issue while deliberately ignoring counter-research. As a purely scholarly publication devoted to scientific investigations, the Empirical Journal of Same-Sex Sexual Behavior will not take any editorial stance or advocacy position for or against gay rights, the age of consent, the criminalization of SS, whether those who practice SS should be induced to change, etc. because these are all matters of public policy, law, politics, moral judgment, and/or opinion. Empirical phenomena constitute the sole academic focus of this journal. A number of our editors and reviewers are anonymous because they fear for their careers. This indicates the degree to which being in scientific fashion regarding gay rights has become a requirement for publication. Even opening the possibility that one is not in favor of gay rights can be a career killer. EJSSB exists to permit free, unfettered inquiry. No editorial stance regarding gay rights pro or con is taken in the hope that, in the long run, truth will out.
so 2% of the population is responsible for 56% of molestations?
oh well, not that there’s anything wrong with that, eh? /sarcasm
This really explains where “homophobes” come from. Those that are molested become either homophobic or queer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.