Skip to comments.
Is it time for a Non-American president? (vanity)
13/10/07
| Phil.K
Posted on 10/13/2007 10:16:37 AM PDT by Jakarta ex-pat
In sports, as in business, we often seek the best possible man/woman for the job.
The person that will lead us on to victory.
Is it time we choose this route when electing our leaders?
Of course, historically, Napoleon and Hitler are examples of why we shouldn't.
Nevertheless a President/prime minister who has the best interests of a country at heart shouldn't be discounted.
Or should it?
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: belongsinchatifatall; foreignborn; stupidquestion; stupidvanity; wasteofbandwidth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Jakarta ex-pat
The US Constitution says that the US President must be a natural-born US Citizen. End of the story.
2
posted on
10/13/2007 10:17:38 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Nevertheless a President/prime minister who has the best interests of a country at heart shouldn't be discounted. Who's country?
3
posted on
10/13/2007 10:18:06 AM PDT
by
Bommer
(“He that controls the spice controls the universe!” (unfortunately that spice is Nutmeg!))
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Historically, foreign leaders didn’t have the country’s best interests at heart. They’ve had their own best interests at heart, and were just using the country to get what they wanted.
No thanks. Too many countries were left in shambles.
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Absolutely!!! Granholm or Schwarzenegger would be EXCELLENT choices. /sarc
5
posted on
10/13/2007 10:22:27 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: Jakarta ex-pat
The fact remains that it isn’t possible without flooding another 100 million illegals in to vote us out of the country with a 2/3 states amendment to the US Constitution.
Just be patient. The dems and other liberal trash are working hard at doing just that, and for now, one Arnold has done enough damage to America.
6
posted on
10/13/2007 10:24:55 AM PDT
by
bill1952
(The 10 most important words for change: "If it is to be, it is up to me")
To: bill1952
The fact remains that it isn’t possible without flooding another 100 million illegals in to vote us out of the country with a 2/3 states amendment to the US Constitution.
I would be presuming that the Non American president would LOVE America; not hate it.
To: bill1952
Just be patient. The dems and other liberal trash are working hard at doing just that,... SI. Dis is y we must vote Jorge Bush 4 a turd term. He will save us. Si?
8
posted on
10/13/2007 10:28:16 AM PDT
by
LoneRangerMassachusetts
(The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
9
posted on
10/13/2007 10:29:47 AM PDT
by
darkangel82
(All right! Let's go Tribe!!)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
This is definitely Top 10 material.
One of the Top 10 most asinine posts I’ve seen ever on FR.
IBTZ?
10
posted on
10/13/2007 10:29:50 AM PDT
by
Eagle Eye
(If you agree with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
To: Eagle Eye
LOL, within three seconds. :)
11
posted on
10/13/2007 10:30:14 AM PDT
by
darkangel82
(All right! Let's go Tribe!!)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
John Jay to George Washington
New York 25 July 1787
Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.
12
posted on
10/13/2007 10:31:57 AM PDT
by
michigander
(The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Is it time for a Non-American president? No, this is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
We have an overabundance of capable people, we don't need to change the Constitution for some misplaced sentimental multi-culti reason.
13
posted on
10/13/2007 10:33:12 AM PDT
by
RJL
To: Jakarta ex-pat
>I would be presuming that the Non
Your presumptions are not enough.
The US Constitution is.
14
posted on
10/13/2007 10:34:54 AM PDT
by
bill1952
(The 10 most important words for change: "If it is to be, it is up to me")
To: Jakarta ex-pat
I favor the US Constitution. And no the Gropinator can’t be president. Sheesh!
15
posted on
10/13/2007 10:36:25 AM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: bill1952
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
And the number of American politicians who believe in this are?
To: Jakarta ex-pat
About the same number as the legal points in your post.
In other words, irrelevant.
You are beating a dead horse that was never even a horse to begin with.
17
posted on
10/13/2007 10:45:09 AM PDT
by
bill1952
(The 10 most important words for change: "If it is to be, it is up to me")
To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
Si, or vote for el presidente Rudy McRomneybee to asseest us to become legal.
18
posted on
10/13/2007 10:47:12 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Security * Unity * Prosperity | Fred08.com)
To: Jakarta ex-pat
Well, we’ve outsourced everything else.
19
posted on
10/13/2007 10:50:00 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: bill1952
I appreciate your answers.
Cheers.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson