Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raiders Of The Faux Ark
Archaeology Magazine ^ | 10-10-2007 | Eric Cline

Posted on 10/16/2007 12:34:53 PM PDT by blam

Raiders of the Faux Ark

October 10, 2007
by Eric H. Cline

Biblical archeology is too important to leave to crackpots and ideologues. It's time to fight back.

This editorial was first published in the Boston Globe on September 30, 2007, and is republished here with their kind permission.

Eric Cline at Megiddo (Courtesy Eric Cline)

Noah's Ark. The Ark of the Covenant. The Garden of Eden. Sodom and Gomorrah. The Exodus. The Lost Tomb of Jesus. All have been "found" in the last 10 years, including one within the past six months. The discoverers: a former SWAT team member; an investigator of ghosts, telepathy, and parapsychology; a filmmaker who calls himself "The Naked Archeologist"; and others, none of whom has any professional training in archeology.

We are living in a time of exciting discoveries in biblical archeology. We are also living in a time of widespread biblical fraud, dubious science, and crackpot theorizing. Some of the highest-profile discoveries of the past several years are shadowed by accusations of forgery, such as the James Ossuary, which may or may not be the burial box of Jesus' brother, as well as other supposed Bible-era findings such as the Jehoash Tablet and a small ivory pomegranate said to be from the time of Solomon. Every year "scientific" expeditions embark to look for Noah's Ark, raising untold amounts of money from gullible believers who eagerly listen to tales spun by sincere amateurs or rapacious con men; it is not always easy to tell the two apart.

The tools of modern archeology, from magnetometers to precise excavation methods, offer a growing opportunity to illuminate some of the intriguing mysteries surrounding the Bible, one of the foundations of western civilization. Yet the amateurs are taking in the public's money to support ventures that offer little chance of furthering the cause of knowledge. With their grand claims, and all the ensuing attention, they divert the public's attention from the scientific study of the Holy Land - and bring confusion, and even discredit, to biblical archeology.

Unfortunately, when fantastic claims are made, they largely go unchallenged by academics. There have been some obvious exceptions, such as the recent film "The Lost Tomb of Jesus," which inspired an outcry from scholars by claiming that archeologists had found, but not recognized, the tomb of Jesus more than 20 years ago. But much more common is a vast and echoing silence reminiscent of the early days of the debate over "intelligent design," when biologists were reluctant to respond to the neocreationist challenge. Archeologists, too, are often reluctant to be seen as challenging deeply held religious beliefs. And so the professionals are allowing a PR disaster to slowly unfold: yielding a field of tremendous importance to pseudoscientists, amateur enthusiasts, and irresponsible documentary filmmakers.

At a time when the world is increasingly divided by religion, both domestically and internationally, and when many people are biblically illiterate, legitimate inquiries into the common origins of religions have never been more important. I believe that the public deserves - and wants - better. We have an obligation to challenge the lies and the hype, to share the real data, so that the public discussion can be an informed one.

It is time we take back our field.

The first archeological endeavors in the Holy Land were conducted not by archeologists, but rather by theologians primarily interested in locating places mentioned in the Bible. Pride of place goes to the American minister Edward Robinson, who toured the Holy Land in 1838, accompanied by an American missionary named Eli Smith who was fluent in Arabic, in order to identify as many sites mentioned in the Bible as possible--in other words, to create a historical (and biblical) geography of Palestine. Others soon followed, including Sir Charles Warren, a British general who explored and recorded the features of Jerusalem in the 1860s. None of these men were archeologists, but they made important contributions to the field.

Throughout much of the nineteenth century, the field of biblical archeology was dominated by men said to have been working with a Bible in one hand and a trowel in the other. The field soon became more scientific, thanks to the efforts of men like Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie, who introduced into archeology the dual concepts of stratigraphy (when two succeeding cities are built one on top of the other, the lower one will always be earlier in time) and pottery seriation (pottery types go in and out of style, just like today's clothes, and can be used to help date the stratigraphic levels observable at ancient sites).

By the time Dame Kathleen Kenyon was excavating in Jericho and Jerusalem during the mid-twentieth century, archeology was in the hands of professionals trained not just in proper excavation techniques, but in the scientific method, and with years of schooling in ancient languages, cultures, and history. They also mastered bodies of literature and theory and spent years practicing their craft and being subjected to peer review. Theological motivation became less important.

Excavations at Megiddo

Today there are strict standards concerning excavations in every country in the Middle East. Permission to excavate must be obtained from the proper authorities, with presentation of a detailed research plan, good reasons given for the questions being examined, evidence of sufficient funding, and often a strategy for conservation of the site upon completion of the excavation. Peer review of any large funding proposals is obligatory. In short, it is a serious and highly competitive field.

As a result, however, we have seen a rise of two cultures - the scientists and the amateur enthusiasts. Lacking the proper training and credentials, the amateurs are sustained by vanity presses, television, and now the Internet.

For example, in 2006, Bob Cornuke, a former SWAT team member turned biblical investigator--and now president of the Bible Archaeology Search and Exploration (BASE) Institute in Colorado - led an expedition searching for Noah's Ark. Media reports breathlessly announced that Cornuke's team had discovered boat-shaped rocks at an altitude of 13,000 feet on Mount Suleiman in Iran's Elburz mountain range. Cornuke said the rocks look "uncannily like wood. . . .We have had [cut] thin sections of the rock made, and we can see [wood] cell structures."

But peer review would have quickly debunked these findings. Kevin Pickering, a geologist at University College London who specializes in sedimentary rocks, said, "The photos appear to show iron-stained sedimentary rocks, probably thin beds of silicified sandstones and shales, which were most likely laid down in a marine environment a long time ago."

Then there is Michael Sanders, who has made a habit of using NASA satellite photographs to search for biblical locations and objects. From 1998 to 2001, Sanders announced that he had not only located the lost cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, but also the Garden of Eden, the Ark of the Covenant, and the Tower of Babel.

Sanders describes himself on his website as a "Biblical Scholar of Archaeology, Egyptology and Assyriology," but according to the Los Angeles Times, he "concedes that he has no formal archeological training." Other newspaper accounts describe him as a "self-made scholar" who did research in parapsychology at Duke University.

And we must not forget documentary filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici. He bills himself as "The Naked Archeologist" in a television series on the History Channel, but has repeatedly stated during media interviews that he is an investigative journalist rather than an archeologist. Jacobovici is perhaps best known for "The Lost Tomb of Jesus," which first aired in March 2007 and which has been described by professor Jodi Magness of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill as making "a sensationalistic claim without any scientific basis or support."

In short, the amateur arena is full of deeply flawed junk science. Important issues are cloaked in legitimate-sounding terminology, little attention is paid to the investigative process, and contrary evidence is ignored.

Biblical archeologists are suddenly finding themselves in a position similar to the evolutionary biologists fighting intelligent design - an entire parallel version of their field is being driven by religious belief, not research principles. The biologists' situation makes the risk clear - they did not deign to mount a public refutation of the "science" of intelligent design for years, until it was almost too late, and thus anti-evolutionary science began making its way into the public schools.

Why are we sitting the battle out?

Partly, this is a matter of a strain of snobbery that runs through many academic fields: a suspicion of colleagues who venture too far from "serious" topics or appear in the popular media too often.

Partly it is a matter of the uncertainty of the stories themselves: many biblical questions are so shrouded in uncertainty as to be inherently unsolvable. For example, even if the Garden of Eden once were a real place, and even if we knew the general location where it might have been, how would we know when we had found it? When most archeologists and biblical scholars hear that someone has (yet again) discovered Noah's Ark, they roll their eyes and get on with their business. This can leave the impression that the report might be true.

And partly it is because scientific findings may challenge religious dogma. Biblical scholarship is highly charged because the Bible is a religious book and any research carries the prospect of "proving" or "disproving" treasured beliefs. What if the Exodus might not have taken place as described in the Bible? Similarly, what will people do when told that there are identical stories to Noah and the Ark, but they were recorded between 500 and 1,000 years earlier sans Noah? And that the flood was sent because the people were too noisy and the Gods couldn't sleep, not because people were evil and sinning? Or when you tell them that "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" was a concept expressed in Hammurabi's Law Code nearly 1,000 years before the Bible?

This is where it can get daunting for academics, for it is at this point that the ideologues frequently weigh in. And these pundits are often sophisticated and convincing debaters, which can make them intimidating opponents for a scholar.

But we don't need to go looking for Noah's Ark to find confirmation of details found in the Bible. During the past century or so, archeologists have found the first mention of Israel outside the Bible, in an Egyptian inscription carved by the pharaoh Merneptah in the year 1207 B.C. They have found mentions of Israelite kings, including Omri, Ahab, and Jehu, in neo-Assyrian inscriptions from the early first millennium B.C. And they have found, most recently, a mention of the House of David in an inscription from northern Israel dating to the ninth century B.C. These are conclusive pieces of evidence that these people and places once existed and that at least parts of the Bible are historically accurate. Perhaps none of these is as attention-getting as finding Noah's Ark, but they serve to deepen our understanding of, and appreciation for, the Bible.

Religious archeologists and secular archeologists frequently work side by side in the Holy Land. Among the top ranks of researchers, there are evangelical Christians, orthodox Jews, and people of many denominations. It is not religious views that are the issue here; it is whether good science is being done. Biblical archeology is a field in which people of good will, and all religions, can join under the banner of the scientific process.

Most archeological organizations, including the American Schools of Oriental Research, the Archaeological Institute of America, and the Society for American Archaeology, state that it is one of the obligations of professional archeologists to make their findings and discoveries generally available. But we need to do more than simply publish research if we are to successfully counter junk science. We need to take our information to the public not only via writing but also via radio, television, film, and any other available media.

Remember that biblical mysteries are not just ancient history. For example, did Joshua really fight the Battle of Jericho and drive the Canaanites out of the land, as stated in the biblical account of the Israelite conquest of Canaan? If so, who was there first and to whom does the land really belong today? Does it matter? It does to many Palestinians, who exert a (dubious) claim as descendants of the Canaanites and Jebusites, and to many Israelis, who exert a similar claim based on their own understanding of their ancestors' history.

Remember, too, that archeologists who speak out can make a difference. "Disclaimer statements" have recently been posted on Bob Cornuke's Web pages concerning the Ark of the Covenant, Noah's Ark, and the location of Mount Sinai. Now, for instance, we find the statement that the BASE Institute "does not make the claim that we have found Noah's Ark. We'll let you draw your own conclusions. In our opinion, it's a candidate. The research continues."

Even when our own investigations come up empty - we can't solve all the mysteries in the Bible - we can present the current state of our evidence. And we can promote a shared methodology, and a shared body of facts, that can be used by everyone. The data and opinions that we provide may not end any debates, but they will introduce genuine archeological and historical data and considerations into the mix. We owe it to the ancient world, and to the people who inhabited it, to do no less.

Eric H. Cline is the author of From Eden to Exile: Unraveling Mysteries of the Bible. He is chair of the department of classical and Semitic languages and literature at the George Washington University in Washington, D.C. He is also associate director (USA) of the ongoing excavations at Megiddo (biblical Armageddon) in Israel. He can be reached at ehcline@gwu.edu.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: archaeology; ark; arkofthecovenant; atheism; atheists; biblical; catastrophism; godsgravesglyphs; hate; hater; haters; hatred; raiders; talkingouthisass

1 posted on 10/16/2007 12:34:58 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

GGG Ping.


2 posted on 10/16/2007 12:35:27 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Hands-on Archaeology (in the Pre-college Classroom)
3 posted on 10/16/2007 12:37:27 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Biblical archeology is a field in which people of good will, and all religions, can join under the banner of the scientific process.

Try selling that on Temple Mount. The best result is that the Arab Waqf will laugh you off. The worst is that YOU will immediately become an artifact.

4 posted on 10/16/2007 12:44:50 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; Berosus; Fred Nerks
I saw that, and saved it somewhere, probably on the iMac before it died. Have the drive though.
Or when you tell them that "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" was a concept expressed in Hammurabi's Law Code nearly 1,000 years before the Bible?
Speaking of the dating of Hammurabi:
Hammurabi and the Revised Chronology
Immanuel Velikovsky
King Hammurabi is the best known of the early monarchs of ancient times due to his famous law code, found inscribed on stone. This great lawgiver of ancient Babylon belonged to the First BabyIonian Dynasty which came to an end, under circumstances shrouded in mystery, some three or four generations after Hammurabi. For the next several centuries, the land was in the domain of a people known as the Kassites... Until a few decades ago, the reign of Hammurabi was dated to around the year 2100 before the present era. This dating was originally prompted by information contained in an inscription of Nabonidus, the last king of Babylon, who reigned in the sixth century... In the foundations of a temple at Larsa, Nabonidus found a plaque of King Burnaburiash. This king is known to us from the el-Amarna correspondence in which he participated. On that plaque Burnaburiash wrote that he had rebuilt the temple erected seven hundred years before by King Hammurabi... When Egyptologists found it necessary to reduce the el-Amarna Age by a quarter of a century, the time of Hammurabi was adjusted accordingly... The period of Hammurabi also served as a landmark for the histories of the Middle East from Elam to Syria, and was used as a guide for the chronological tables of other nations... A connecting link was actually found between the First Babylonian Dynasty and the Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt, the great dynasty of the Middle Kingdom. At Platanos on Crete, a seal of the Hammurabi type was discovered in a tomb together with Middle Minoan pottery of a kind associated at other sites with objects of the Twelfth Egyptian Dynasty, more exactly, of its earlier part... At Mari on the central Euphrates... a cuneiform tablet was found which established that Hammurabi of Babylonia and King Shamshi-Adad I of Assyria were contemporaries... Shamshi-Adad I could not have reigned in the twenty-first century since there exist lists of Assyrian kings which enable us to compute regnal dates... By adding to the last year the sum of the regnal years, as given in the list of the kings from Shamshi-Adad to Assur-Nerari, the first year of Shamshi-Adad is calculated to have been -1726 and his last year -1694... The realization that the dating of Hammurabi must be brought forward by three and a half centuries created "a puzzling chronological discrepancy", which could only be resolved by making Hammurabi later than Amenemhet I of the Twelfth Dynasty... If Hammurabi reigned at the time allotted to him by the finds at Mari and Khorsabad -- but according to the finds at Platanos was a contemporary of the Egyptian kings of the early Twelfth Dynasty -- then that dynasty must have started at a time when, according to the accepted chronology, it had already come to its end.

5 posted on 10/16/2007 12:50:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

My favorite screed of this type was the review years ago, I think it was in Archaeology magazine, "a publication of the Archaeological Institute of America", of a book by Barry Fell, in which the reviewer referred to the book as "a candidate for burning".
6 posted on 10/16/2007 12:53:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; AFPhys; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; ...
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

7 posted on 10/16/2007 12:54:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks Blam.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.

The quarterly FReepathon is underway.
GGG managers are Blam, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


8 posted on 10/16/2007 12:58:29 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

A pantload of hand-wringing by someone who feels his authority is threatened.

As long as amateurs can dig up old stuff, professional old stuff digger-uppers will have to deal with it.


9 posted on 10/16/2007 1:09:06 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan

I thought the same thing. You expressed my thoughts quite nicely.


10 posted on 10/16/2007 1:12:58 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

ibid


11 posted on 10/16/2007 1:20:05 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Nabonides son, Belshazzar, was ruling in Babylon the day it fell to the conquerors. Nabonides was away at his religious retreat town.


12 posted on 10/16/2007 1:25:16 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support. Defend life support for others in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

Somebody get this man a diaper.


13 posted on 10/16/2007 1:37:55 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

pinging


14 posted on 10/16/2007 1:44:12 PM PDT by Amalie (FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
For example, even if the Garden of Eden once were a real place, and even if we knew the general location where it might have been, how would we know when we had found it?

Ye wouldst knoweth it when the cherubim waveth a fiery sword in thy face, and sayeth, "Forsooth, swiftly get thee hence!"

15 posted on 10/16/2007 2:34:04 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (...and there is no new thing under the sun.. Ecclesiastes 1:9 [KJV])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

Interesting to me that collective human memory seems to fail at about 300 years. I have a hunch that about 500 years from now, scholars will be debating whether Washington or Jefferson was America’s first real president and whether John Adams existed at all! And, no doubt, those researchers will be well funded in their search! lol


16 posted on 10/16/2007 2:53:47 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Continental Soldier

There won’t be any scholars or researchers 500 years from now...civilization will be only a memory.


17 posted on 10/16/2007 3:15:47 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Continental Soldier

There won’t be any scholars or researchers 500 years from now...civilization will be only a memory.


18 posted on 10/16/2007 3:16:15 PM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
What if the Exodus might not have taken place as described in the Bible?

TROUBLED TIMES

In the middle of the second millennium before the present era (approximately 3,500 years ago), the earth underwent one of the greatest catastrophes in its history. A celestial body ... came very close to the earth. The account of this catastrophe can be reconstructed from evidence supplied by a large number of documents. The comet .. touched the earth first with it's gaseous tail. .. Servius wrote, "It was not of a flaming but of a bloody redness."

One of the first visible signs of this encounter was the reddening of the earth's surface by a fine dust of rusty pigment. In sea, lake, and river this pigment gave a bloody coloring to the water. Because of these particles of ferruginous or other soluble pigment, the world turned red.

The Manuscript Quiche of the Mayas tells that in the Western Hemisphere, in the days of a great cataclysm, when the earth quaked and the sun's motion was interrupted, the water in the rivers turned to blood.

Ipuwer, the Egyptian eyewitness to the catastrophe, wrote his lament on papyrus, "The river is blood", and this corresponds with the Book of Exodus 7:20: "All the waters that were in the river were turned to blood".

19 posted on 10/16/2007 4:15:22 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
A pantload of hand-wringing by someone who feels his authority is threatened.

As long as amateurs can dig up old stuff, professional old stuff digger-uppers will have to deal with it.

DITTO

For ex: I've read Jacobovici's "Tomb of Jesus", saw the show, and watched his TV interview with the dunderhead George Wills and 3 'experts' who weren't so much interested in what Jacobovici had to say as they were incensed that anyone other then they - the experts - were allowed to say anything.

There's another book that I set beside "Tomb": "James, the Brother of Jesus" - very informing for anyone who is honest enough to follow the facts of who James really was (and as it is even spelled out , (but glossed over by the churches) - in the New Testament. It is, however, another real inconvenient truth to the powers that be...and I suspicion there will be many more to come what with total access to the Internet. Information can no longer be kept in a lock box.

the Lost Tomb of Jesus is also available in DVD


20 posted on 10/16/2007 4:39:06 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

ping


21 posted on 10/16/2007 4:41:23 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
The Manuscript Quiche

Sounds like a French Dark Ages recipe. Doesn't rise well, and tastes a bit musty.

Servius wrote, "It was not of a flaming but of a bloody redness."

The bloody 'ell, ye say! I guess ye could fork it forever, and it still wouldn't be done.

Was this the same comet's tail that filled the atmosphere with sugary granules, that eventually fell as mana? Or the one that created petroleum droplets?

the reddening of the earth's surface by a fine dust of rusty pigment.

Lucky it was soluble pigment; removes any need to explain why we don't find traces of it anywhere in the stratigraphic record.

Ipuwer, the Egyptian eyewitness to the catastrophe,

One entire Egyptian? I'm stuned that so many saw and wrote of it!

22 posted on 10/16/2007 5:10:46 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (...and there is no new thing under the sun.. Ecclesiastes 1:9 [KJV])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

http://www.specialtyinterests.net/ipuwer.html


23 posted on 10/16/2007 11:21:36 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
As long as amateurs can dig up old stuff, professional old stuff digger-uppers will have to deal with it.

You might try brain surgery. That makes a good hobby too.

24 posted on 10/17/2007 8:13:15 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Oh come on. I know you’re an intelligent person. Equating archaeology with neurosurgery is a bit of a stretch, dontcha think? Or has the black market in specialized brain surgery been booming lately?


25 posted on 10/17/2007 8:41:16 AM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blam
ut much more common is a vast and echoing silence reminiscent of the early days of the debate over "intelligent design," when biologists were reluctant to respond to the neocreationist challenge

...aaaaand there he loses me.

It's so funny, FReepers have contempt for the "Trust The Experts" line everywhere but here.

26 posted on 10/17/2007 8:43:58 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

read


27 posted on 10/17/2007 8:45:31 AM PDT by sauropod ("Nobody has time for your priceless prose. Get to the point." - Jim Michaels RIP 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
Oh come on. I know you’re an intelligent person. Equating archaeology with neurosurgery is a bit of a stretch, dontcha think? Or has the black market in specialized brain surgery been booming lately?

I did six years of grad school to learn archaeology and related subjects. You can learn brain surgery in less time.

My point is that serious archaeology is no place for amateurs. They cause more damage and problems than they are worth.

28 posted on 10/17/2007 8:47:42 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“America, B.C.”?


29 posted on 10/17/2007 5:41:38 PM PDT by Pelham (Spanish is the new English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

That was the first of three.


30 posted on 10/17/2007 7:40:24 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, October 16, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Thanks for the link, Fred.

Somehow, I can’t get any more out of that than a rather poetic lamention about the destruction of his nation by “foreign tribe from abroad” invaders.

The side-by-side seems pretty stretched.

Blood, guts, gore, atrocities, fire, destuction, and more blood. Sounds like a typical ancient invade, kill, loot, rape, pillage, burn, and destroy scenario.


31 posted on 10/18/2007 12:33:23 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson