Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is “peak oil” the new end-of-the-world?
Backwoods Home ^ | 10-16-07 | John Silveira

Posted on 10/16/2007 6:11:57 PM PDT by SJackson

“Peak oil” is becoming the latest doomsday buzzword. What is it? It’s a well-thought-out theory that predicts that the rate at which we find and recover oil is soon going to fall behind the rate at which we consume it. The point at which that happens is the “peak.” Prior to this peak, prices will have been relatively stable and reasonable, and the economies of the world have grown because the supply of energy outpaced the demand. But there is coming a time, and some say it’s here now, when the world’s oil fields cannot produce as fast as we consume. Demand will exceed supply, oil prices are going to skyrocket, and the world’s economies are going to begin to fail as the oil fields themselves fail.

Oil today is important to civilization. We use it to produce electric power and to make gasoline, heating oil, fertilizer, chemicals, plastics, and more. Eighty-four percent goes to power and fuel, and only 16% to other things. What happens if we run out? Tidy little doomsday scenarios have been woven and show how transportation will stop running, food production will drop because of less fertilizer and pesticides, currency markets will fail, prices of everything will take off, and this will mean both the end of civilization as we know it and an irreversible decline in the human condition. It’s all very neat, but that doesn’t mean it’s accurate.

(Excerpt) Read more at backwoodshome.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: energy; oil; peakoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: khnyny

That was the best line for me too!!!

You were clever enough to read my link so you now have a better education about what BS free markets are and how the real players grab whatever they can. Real players in oil/energy that is


41 posted on 10/16/2007 8:49:42 PM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Some libertarians and capitalists have bought into peak oil theory, it isn’t just socialists.
It looks like a good theory if you stare narrowly at mexico, or maybe saudi arabia, but falls apart when you look more broadly.

I don’t buy into peak oil theory at all, though mexico is an an interesting localized question.

Natural gas however is a very different story. Supplies really aren’t increasing much at all, despite big investments to try to make it happen. A lot of infrastructure being build to ship existing supply, but not much new supply. Big problem for those that depend too heavily on natural gas to make electricity.


42 posted on 10/16/2007 9:28:39 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

We’re going to die! It’s the end! We’re all going to die!

Actually, that’s all true. The other truth is that the world will continue without us just fine.


43 posted on 10/16/2007 10:20:11 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Oil’s gone up, but my gas price has gone down. I guess it will go back up eventually. With the dollar down oil was going up, with the Democrats trying to start a war between Turkey and Iraq the price went up.

I read a liberal Virginia blogger tonight who was trying to argue that MARKETS run the oil prices. Of course he’s saying that, now that the democrats are in charge and the oil prices are skyrocketing.

But while it was clearly true that it wasn’t Bush’s fault the oil prices were going up, it is clearly partly the Democrat’s fault, as they are stirring up unrest in the middle east, are blocking new oil drilling.


44 posted on 10/16/2007 10:41:37 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Hemp is the answer. It either solves all of this mess, or dulls the pain of dealing with it. It is hard to logic with that argument.

Actually, it is time for whale oil again, as we have reached peak with whales. F’n things are everywhere these days, some don’t even have jobs.


45 posted on 10/16/2007 10:45:21 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

I think we’ll see more gas on the market because more of it is being captured and brought to market. The battle is over the big off-shore unloading facilities for LNG ships along the US coast.


46 posted on 10/17/2007 5:54:17 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Agreed. I’ll also add that it probably isn’t helping much that the U.S. dollar is around its lowest level of value in our history.


47 posted on 10/17/2007 6:46:27 AM PDT by jpl (Dear Al Gore: it's 3:00 A.M., do you know where your drug addicted son is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

not to sound like a dick here but if you do bussiness in Russia you deserve what you get. Frankly I don’t care how much oil they have there, I still wouldn’t touch it with a nine foot pole. Everything In russia ends up nationalized, its just a matter of how much you can squeak out before it happens.

If I ever do get into the oil bussiness in one of those commie countries one the of the things I’ll do is plant explosives at key points and set them off the moment troops land in my property. Send them right back to square one.


48 posted on 10/17/2007 8:20:21 AM PDT by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: utherdoul

your take is 100% legit

I believe Royal Dutch Shell has been involved in Sakhalin Island oil/energy for 15+ years. They got in before that savage Putin ruled Russia


49 posted on 10/17/2007 11:15:15 AM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan

50 posted on 10/17/2007 11:20:43 AM PDT by RightWhale (50 years later we're still sitting on the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Well...since all the Biblical, Science, and Conspiracy based end-of-the-world scenarios fail to come true time and time again...why not try “peak oil” for a second time?


51 posted on 10/17/2007 11:21:53 AM PDT by RockinRight (Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

I’m still waiting for the bird flu pandemic. I was promised that I’d have gotten it by now. No one ever keeps their promises anymore.


52 posted on 10/17/2007 11:22:57 AM PDT by LIConFem (Thompson 2008. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter 2008 (VP) Lifetime ACU Rating: 92)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mountainlyons

53 posted on 10/17/2007 11:24:06 AM PDT by RightWhale (50 years later we're still sitting on the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

The bird flu won’t happen here because so many don’t believe in evolution.


54 posted on 10/17/2007 11:25:12 AM PDT by RightWhale (50 years later we're still sitting on the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

So we’ve been saved by the Creationists?


55 posted on 10/17/2007 11:26:31 AM PDT by LIConFem (Thompson 2008. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter 2008 (VP) Lifetime ACU Rating: 92)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

The Alaska-Siberia Tunnel committee had a meeting today in Anchorage. Russian businessmen who want the 68 mile tunnel and the sooner the better are working hard on the project. The railroad route from Nome to Fairbanks is being surveyed now. The birds won’t have to fly, they can ride.


56 posted on 10/17/2007 11:34:07 AM PDT by RightWhale (50 years later we're still sitting on the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I will say most posters are full of crap.

Totally agree: VGPMX, OPGSX, PRNEX

57 posted on 10/17/2007 11:56:44 AM PDT by OregonRancher (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: OregonRancher

EWZ

Brazil is selling tons of soy and raw materials to China

http://moneycentral.msn.com/detail/stock_quote?ipage=qd&Symbol=EWZ

http://moneycentral.msn.com/detail/stock_quote?Symbol=US%3AFXI

http://moneycentral.msn.com/detail/stock_quote?ipage=qd&Symbol=MOO


58 posted on 10/17/2007 12:06:20 PM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor
We just want a fair market for energy supplies.

With all due respect that is a pathetic plea undergirded by a child like faith in free markets backed up by rule of law. These markets exist here in USA but not in the world wide energy markets

Russia doesn't play your "free market" game. Nor does China Venezuela or Iran. Powerful thug-ocracies move the market. Not free consumers and free suppliers of energy in the fair market you yearn for

59 posted on 10/17/2007 12:12:33 PM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Nicholas Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I have no expertise or inside information about energy markets. To me, it is clear that cartels are operating on part of the supply side. In the past, OPEC has been undercut by non OPEC countries and cheating inside of OPEC. Perhaps the cartels have increased their influence on the supply side.

The supply side cartel does not directly determine the price for crude. Crude contracts are traded on world wide energy markets. There is evidence that OPEC does not want the price of crude too high because it will encourage alternative energy sources and additional exploration. Russia is a more secretive and sinister player than OPEC.

I am strongly opposed to energy cartels as I am to labor and producer cartels. There should be a way to bring actions against the energy cartels using international trade agreements. I am surprised that energy cartels have not been targeted in trade agreements.

I am not sure what policies can be taken to combat the energy cartels. Our current policy of energy mandates on renewables and ethanol is clearly not the answer. I would prefer to increase domestic exploration and development of oil and natural gas. I would also let the market determine the proper mix of energy sources. Our current policy will only increase the influence of the energy cartels leading to high energy prices and shortages.

60 posted on 10/17/2007 1:01:51 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson