Kindergarten Children should Dance Naked and Masturbate in Pre-Schools; Norwegian Child Expert

LifeSiteNews ^ | 10/17/07 | Hilary White

[wagglebee]

OSLO, Norway, October 17, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – An Oslo pre-school teacher, backed by child psychologists, has suggested that kindergarten children be encouraged to “express” their sexuality through “sex-play” and games, including dancing naked and masturbating, in pre-school and day-care centres.
 
The English language edition of Norway’s Aftenposten newspaper reports that Pia Friis, the respected operator of an Oslo kindergarten, told an interviewer that children should be able “to look at each other and examine each other's bodies. They can play doctor, play mother and father, dance naked and masturbate”.
 
“But their sexuality must also be socialized, so they are not, for example, allowed to masturbate while sitting and eating. Nor can they be allowed to pressure other children into doing things they don't want to,” Friis said.
 
Friis also faulted some staff of day-care centres and kindergartens who, she said, might react negatively to children expressing their sexuality. “When the personnel are uncertain, that passes on to the children, and it can be negative.”
 
Friis’ opinion was backed up by Norwegian child psychologist Thore Langfeldt, who said, “Children must learn about sexuality, otherwise things can go very wrong.”
 
“Children can't object to something they don't know about, and children can more easily and readily report assaults if they already are aware of their own sexuality.”
 
In the US earlier this year, a report published by the American Psychological Association (APA) warned against the early sexualizing of young girls, especially through media and marketing. The APA task force found that teachers and parents are among the influences in the over-sexualization of children and that girls often end by seeing themselves as sexual objects. The results can include increased risks of depression, eating disorders and low self-esteem.
 
Joseph D’Agostino of the Population Research Institute (PRI) wrote that the APA report did not go far enough in exploring the effects of radical feminism on teaching children to see themselves sexually. In a PRI weekly briefing, he wrote, “The politically correct view is that the sexualization of girls and feminism are opposing forces, but in fact they have gone hand-in-hand.” He wrote that feminism teaches girls that chastity is a form of “oppression”. 
 
“They have taught that there are no natural limits to sexuality,” he wrote. “Based on feminist principles, why shouldn’t little girls sexualize themselves? And why shouldn’t adult men and women view them as sexual if there is no such thing as unnatural sexuality?”
 
Others have made the connection with early sexualizing of children with child sexual abuse. Cathy Wing, of Media-Awareness, a non-profit educational organization for media literacy said that sexually explicit advertising or products aimed at pre-teens naturally leads to adults treating children as sexual beings ready for exploitation. Wing told the Toronto Sun, “Perhaps when we surround ourselves with sexualized images of young people we shouldn't be surprised that a segment of the society think that it is okay to have sex with children,”
 
The suggestion by Norwegian child experts follows a larger trend in many countries of the European Union to raise the level of sexual activity in every area of the culture.
 
In May 2006, the German government was blasted by dozens of human rights groups and experts in human trafficking for building new brothels and “sex huts” in time to service fans at the World Cup soccer tournament in Berlin. It was estimated that 40,000 women were added, with official approval, to the existing 400,000 who already plied Germany’s legal prostitution or “sex-trade”.
 
In July 2007, the German Ministry for Family Affairs was accused of “state-encouraged incest” when it issued a pair of education booklets encouraging parents to sexually massage their children as young as 1 to 3 years of age. One of the booklets recommended that fathers should “devote attention” to the sexual organs of young daughters and another suggested teaching children the movements of copulation.
 
German Government Blasted for Facilitating Massive Prostitution at World Cup in Berlin
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/may/06050108.html
 
German Government Publication Promotes Incestuous Pedophilia as Healthy Sex Ed
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jul/07073008.html

[montag813]

Nor can they be allowed to pressure other children into doing things they don't want to,” Friis said.

Uh, it is the teacher who is pressuring ALL kids into doing this, regardless of their "wants".

Example:
1. Boy "A" gets naked and rubs his penis in front of Boy "B"
2. Boy "B" tells the other boy to stop doing that
3. Teacher tells Boy "B" that it is fine and dandy for Boy "A" to be doing it
4. Boy "B" feels ashamed, and pressured into acting like Boy "A" as a result of teacher's pressure

[Ancient Drive]

this is by far the sickest thing I’ve read ever! truly we are in the end of times.

[TigersEye]

I agree with Doughty One.

I agree with that. Post #51 is the best on the thread.

Doughty One - #51

[Froufrou]

You know, if people would just STOP and THINK.

What has happened [I’ll use Roe vs. Wade as for instance] is that we’ve put persons in key positions of trust who should NEVER have been there.

In turn, these key persons have sold us a bill of goods, but because they are key people we think they have our best interests at heart. Gives a whole new meaning to this:

QUOTE: “Oh, ye of little faith!” We have put too much faith in government and not enough in our Maker!

[TigersEye]

No, I think your wrong. Pelosi is an elitist, she would be mortified if her grandchildren did this, this is for more "common" folk.

I don't know about that. Pelosi apparently didn't bat a bug-eyed eyelash when, on national TV, Whoopi said she would like to "do" Nancy and her husband. I wonder what her grandchildren thought about that?

[Froufrou]

Wasn’t that just the crudest? But that’s Whoopi! Crude to the core!

[Quix]

AIN’T THE NWO GRAND?

Step right up!

Get your society shredding values and behaviors here.

Let us demean, trash, obliterate, mangle, kill all dear to you . . . and lastly you . . .

that 200,000,000 global population limite you know.

/s . . . sort of

[Froufrou]

I had to tell you I like your tagline! Jesus is good. All the time.

[Quix]

Thanks thanks.

[wagglebee]

Yep, there's a few Protestants around here who have a clue! /MAJOR sarcasm off

:-)

[TigersEye]

As I told my 80 year old mother, who is actually pretty sharp but can't quite absorb such in-your-face-obscenity, "Whoopi talks like a pig and lives like a pig." There really isn't any more to it than that.

What is truly incredible is that it passes for 'tea time chat' on national TV and "the Most Powerful Woman in America" just sits there with a vacant stare and a plastic smile on her face while some degenerate pervert suggests a menage a trois between said degenerate, the Speaker of the House and the Speaker's husband (who is sitting right there as well.)

Perhaps in the next Democrat debate the candidates can answer questions about their fantasy Hollywood date and what perversion they would most like to engage in with them. Ask them if they would tape their Oval Office romps and share them with everybody on Youtube since we didn't have that advantage during the Clinton Orgy Era.

[Quix]

Uhhhhhhhhhh . . .

I think I’ll just let

PRAISE THE LORD!

suffice.

LUB

[TigersEye]

My apologies to you and FR if my sense of decorum has disintegrated too far. But it seems this is what our “Hollywood Heroes,” media “guideposts” and “Glorious Leaders” are telling us we need to accept as normal and enlightened behavior.

[Froufrou]

Quite unnecessary to apologize! I couldn’t possibly agree more!

[TigersEye]

I appreciate that. I sometimes can't believe what I am saying when simply trying to respond appropriately to the things manifesting before my eyes. But I don't want to sit like a deer in the headlights and just let the insanity keep coming without a peep. Greeting it with an "Oh my, that's a little precocious don't you think?" just isn't going to cut it for me.

I want these communist "progressives" to know that they're crossing a line wherein a "civilized" response can no longer be considered a compassionate response. I also want "compassionate" conservatives to understand that too. If reason doesn't take a strong stand against insanity when a soft approach has failed then at some point reason will hold no sway over anyone.

When faced with unrestrained madness many a moral and ethical person will find it hard to keep their bearings. To put it another way; it isn't possible to live with insanity and give it a place of acceptance and prominence along with things like honor, honesty, loyalty and the like. IOWs the beneficial ideals of rational thought and action. That reduces all concepts of behavior to the chaos of indefinable meaninglessness.

[DoughtyOne]

We have moved from animal/cave man to organized society. It seems we are now reverting back to animal/cave man.

I know what you mean and I essentially agree as far as it goes.  I do think we are entering something much more sinister though.  We are not cave men.  At this point in human advancement, we have far superior knowledge.  Having that knowledge, we will not become enlightened and grow out of what we seem to be headed into.  No, we have found a way to intellectualize the worst of human characteristics, and seem poised to go down that road.  If we do, it will be a road of no return.  Rationalizing this behavior referencing all that we have witnessed thorughout human history, the pure evils and not rejecting them again, there will be no wholesale rejection of them after this IMO.  No, we are poised to accept this devious nature of man, institutionalize it and herald it as the brave new future.

Damn not the cave man in relation to this.  Damn us for where we are headed, and think of the caveman as far superior to what we may be choosing to become as humanity.  Perhaps inhumanity would be more accurate.

[DoughtyOne]

I have passed through San Fransico about seven times in my life. I have stayed in town three times. I haven’t gone to the city yet, without being quite content to leave. I don’t see anything charming about the place. And yes, I like to frequent a lot of other places much better.

Honestly, I have no idea what you folks see in that place.

[DoughtyOne]

I try to be very careful what I log onto, on the internet. I’d like to know more about what NAMBLA and White racists are up to, but I just won’t visit their sites.

Funny thing though, I wouldn’t be afraid to visit hispanic and black racist sites.

[DoughtyOne]

Thank you.

[DoughtyOne]

Yes we have. And it makes me think about those who don’t even acknowledge Him.