Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philly punishes Scouts over 'gay' issue ^ | October 20, 2007

Posted on 10/20/2007 3:55:36 AM PDT by Man50D

Prompted by opposition to the Boy Scouts' rule disqualifying homosexuals as troop leaders, Philadelphia has forced the city's local chapter to pay fair-market rent of $200,000 a year for its city-owned headquarters.

As WND reported in June, Philadelphia's city council voted to renege on a 1928 ordinance allowing the Cradle of Liberty Council to have its headquarters in a building on a parcel of public land "in perpetuity" for $1 a year.

The city argues it can't rent public property for a nominal sum to any group that discriminates.

City officials in San Francisco and Boston have made similar decisions displacing the Scouts because of the group's behavior code.

Fairmount Park Commission president Robert N.C. Nix announced this week the Cradle of Liberty Council must pay the $200,000 rent if it wants to remain in the building after May 31.

Jeff Jubelirer, spokesman for the Cradle of Liberty Council, told the Associated Press the higher rent money "would have to come from programs. That's 30 new Cub Scout packs, or 800 needy kids going to our summer camp."

"It's disappointing, and it's certainly a threat," he said.

Homosexual organizations previously challenged the Scouts' policy, but lost at the U.S. Supreme Court level, where a 2000 ruling confirmed that as a private group, the Scouts could set restrictions for their leaders.

The activist groups then turned their sights on property arrangements such as in Philadelphia, where the Scouts had been using a parcel of public property, only with some maintenance costs, for years.

The Philadelphia Scouting council in 2003 said it would adopt a nondiscrimination policy on homosexuals, but reversed itself within weeks and then dismissed an 18-year-old who publicly announced his homosexuality during that time period.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: boyscouts; bsa; bsalist; homosexualagenda; philadelphia; scouts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: brityank

It’s looking pretty bad. I went to the King Tut exhibit at the Franklin Institute. I came out and found bums sleeping on every bench on the Parkway. I got hit by I don’t know how many panhandlers. I saw what looked like some sort of gypsy camp next to a police station.

21 posted on 10/20/2007 8:36:56 AM PDT by Tribune7 (Dems want to rob from the poor to give to the rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

The City if Philadelphia sucks and it has for a very long time

22 posted on 10/20/2007 10:15:29 AM PDT by Mo1 (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
Not every homosexual is a predator -

Studies clearly show that percentage of homosexuals are predominant in same sex molestation cases. This increases where 'straight' men molest boys, a homosexual act. This is far out of proportion to the homosexual percentage of the population in general. Therefore, it is safer to view homosexuals as a threat to boys in scouting, safer for parents. Finally, most, if not all of the boy scout molestation incidences have been wrought by homosexuals.

23 posted on 10/20/2007 10:23:50 AM PDT by Godzilla (I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kindred
This is the goal of the leftist godless athiests of America.

The socialists goal is to destroy our Democratic Republic. One method is to make the family dysfunctional. In doing so they will destroy the foundation of the country.
24 posted on 10/20/2007 1:21:24 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; RonF


25 posted on 10/20/2007 8:34:40 PM PDT by Coleus (Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Wasn’t it Newt Gingrich who said that refusing to reward someone is not the same thing as punishing them?

26 posted on 10/23/2007 6:01:14 PM PDT by Squeaky Wheels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson