Skip to comments.Zogby Poll: Half Say They Would Never Vote for Hillary Clinton for President
Posted on 10/20/2007 11:22:06 AM PDT by keepitreal
While she is winning wide support in nationwide samples among Democrats in the race for their partys presidential nomination, half of likely voters nationwide said they would never vote for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, a new Zogby Interactive poll shows.
The online survey of 9,718 likely voters nationwide showed that 50% said Clinton would never get their presidential vote. This is up from 46% who said they could never vote for Clinton in a Zogby International telephone survey conducted in early March. Older voters are most resistant to Clinton 59% of those age 65 and older said they would never vote for the New York senator, but she is much more acceptable to younger voters: 42% of those age 1829 said they would never vote for Clinton for President.
(Excerpt) Read more at zogby.com ...
Didn’t stop Beezelbubba either time which should make us more nervous than them.
And this from the left leaning Zogby Polls? Interesting.
Her hubby won with 43% of the vote.
Third party candidate at that time. Talk of the same this time based on who gets the Republican nomination. That’s Hillary’s ticket...
She does not need 50% of the votes to win. She just has to carry the right states.
Time for the Clintons to dig up a third party candidate.
What I’ve been saying for year...the Shrew is unelectable in a national election. Let’s hope she gets the Dem nomination.
Hard to win when 50% of the voters will NEVER vote for you!
Yes, but rats have their ways of finding, make that waking up, the needed votes.
True, but I’m not sure that I believe the poll. Zogby isn’t above lying to us in hopes that the Right will lower its guard against advancement of the Antichrist.
We’ve just got to work hard to nominate a conservative. Iowa and New Hampshire are just around the corner. It’s time to stop worrying and time to start using the same energy we used to kill the amnesty bill into supporting conservative candidates. In my case it’s Thompson.
That's what everyone was saying about Bill Clinton in 1991.
Wait til the Clintons lure a third-party candidate like Ross Perot into the race - - then she won’t need 51% of the votes.
Wait till they hear her stump speeches every night on the news shrieking with that voice that makes you want to jab icepicks into your ear drums.
Perhaps Zogby still holds Hillary's vote for the war against her.
“That’s what everyone was saying about Bill Clinton in 1991.”
A valid point but she does not have near the charm that Bubba did. That said, a third party candidate with a following like Perot’s is still a scary thought.
Unless it’s Al Gore.
Oh well there are a host of illegals who will overcome that 50%. No well will be left untapped.
All the more reason why the GOP must not choose Rudy Guliani, and instead opt for Romney, Thompson ... or ?
I wholeheartedly believe the mushy middle will support Romney the most, and Thompson to a lesser extent -- rather than vote for a shrill quasi communist like Hillary.
“Unless its Al Gore.”
Hisortically, I just don’t get that lucky. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.