Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'This Is Not a Bluff'- A Christian political leader on the threat of a third party.
Newsweek.com ^ | October 23, 2007

Posted on 10/23/2007 11:47:00 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia

Christian conservatives want more respect. They were instrumental in propelling George W. Bush to power—twice—and now they're feeling neglected. At a "Values Voters" summit in Washington last week, leading evangelicals gathered to speak out and take a straw poll. The survey showed how unhappy they are with the twice-divorced, pro-choice Republican front runner for the presidential nomination, Rudy Giuliani. He got less than two percent of the overall vote. (Some Christian activists have threatened to back a third-party candidate if Giuliani wins the GOP nomination.)

Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney won the straw poll of 5,775 conservatives, which included voters who have been able to cast online ballots since August. But many evangelicals are uncomfortable with Romney's Mormon faith. That may have factored in the voting of people who actually attended the summit: Romney lost that tally by a wide margin to former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, who is also an ordained Southern Baptist minister. To better understand the current thinking of Christian conservatives, NEWSWEEK's Jeffrey Bartholet and Eve Conant spoke to Richard Land, a leading evangelical who serves as president of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission. Excerpts:

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: christianvote; divideandconquer; elections; enemedia; land; thirdparty; valuesvoters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-278 next last
I guess this is Newsweek's way of cheerleading for a conservative third party movement.
1 posted on 10/23/2007 11:47:01 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Two words: RUNOFF ELECTIONS.....


2 posted on 10/23/2007 11:51:16 AM PDT by jeddavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

I thought Thompson was going to solve this so-called problem for the GOP.


3 posted on 10/23/2007 11:52:08 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Great! The Guaranteed Democratic Win Party!


4 posted on 10/23/2007 11:52:31 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
If these people are so concerned about morals and a pro life candidate, why is Sam Brownback having to drop out???

Sam Brownback had many faults, but he was pro-life as pro life can be (Don’t give me any crap about Immigration).

Also the grand ayatollah himself wanted that great moral leader Newt to run for President. How does that square with his opposition to Rudy? Let me repeat, I am not a Rudy supporter in the primaries, but if these groups want to vote themselves out of existence, like Ross Perot, go ahead.

If we get 4 years of Hillary, they will be eliminated as an opposition group.

5 posted on 10/23/2007 11:54:15 AM PDT by Perdogg (Join the NCAA basketball thread - Freemail me - Go tarheels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

I am a Christian conservative, but they should not do this. If they do, they will cause damage equal to that of Ross Perot. Different issue, same result.

Clinton + Pelosi + Reid = ?


6 posted on 10/23/2007 11:54:54 AM PDT by tennteacher (Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Reminds me of the old joke.

Man comes home and find the wife in bed with his best friend.

He pulls out his gun and sticks it under his chin.

The wife starts laughing.

He says, don’t laugh, your next.

7 posted on 10/23/2007 11:56:04 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Talk is cheap. On election day, when the reality of a likely Hillary presidency becomes clear, evangelicals are not going to vote 3rd party.


8 posted on 10/23/2007 11:58:24 AM PDT by Bobkk47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tennteacher

exactly... Another Ross Perot is the answer for the libs.


9 posted on 10/23/2007 11:58:32 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tennteacher

There is no one conservative leader, IMO these guys are trying to remain relevant, I think if comes down to pro abortion anti famliy Hillary vs a Romney or a Thompson, it won’t matter what Dobson has to say, and that party will go nowhere.

The next President will have at least two (2) Supreme Court Nominations, no way anyone who cares about life puts Hillary in charge of selecting who they will be.


10 posted on 10/23/2007 11:59:24 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ No more miller brewing products, pass it on....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

From the article:

It would be like asking an African-American to choose between Strom Thurmond and George Wallace or asking Abe Lincoln to vote for a pro-slavery candidate. I personally can’t do it. I am not going to criticize those who choose the lesser-of-two-evils option.
***Sounds right.


11 posted on 10/23/2007 12:00:13 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

“Oh great wise leader, I say this vote is mine, but neighbor says it is hers. What should we do.”

“Let’s cut it in two, then each of you can have half.”


12 posted on 10/23/2007 12:00:39 PM PDT by feedback doctor (green is the new red. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Newsweak... real insight into the Republican right. /s


13 posted on 10/23/2007 12:02:28 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Newsweak is trying to cause division.


14 posted on 10/23/2007 12:03:18 PM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

If we get 4 years of Hillary, they will be eliminated as an opposition group.: SO SICK OF THAT KIND OF RHETORIC: IF THE REPUBLICANS LOOSE- IT’ll BE THEIR FAULT: For electing a LIBERAL/Rino as their candidate (Sheesh..you and others act as if these VOTERS: OWE their Alegience to the All Powerful Political Party, rather than the other way around- in which our elected leaders must “earn” our most fought after right to vote!


15 posted on 10/23/2007 12:04:32 PM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
Talk is cheap. On election day, when the reality of a likely Hillary presidency becomes clear, evangelicals are not going to vote 3rd party.

They'll act just like my five year old. Throw a tantrum, fall on the ground, and kick and scream until someone pays attention to them. They aren't bright enough to realize they have a choice between 90% of what they want and 0% of what they want. They'll shoot themselves in the foot and get 0% because they want attention.
16 posted on 10/23/2007 12:05:31 PM PDT by GreenOgre (mohammed is the false prophet of a false god.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
They were instrumental in propelling George W. Bush to power—twice—and now they're feeling neglected. At a "Values Voters" summit

I really hate what the Values Voters have been doing to conservatism and to the Republican Party.

I do wish they'd act on their threat and leave. Permanently.

"Propelling GWB to power" is not exactly a big plus, IMO, and I for one am sick to death of the irrelevant criteria they use to select their Bishop Of The United States.

They are a disaster for conservatism and for the Party (for which I have been active since 1968 as a Republican youth and from a churchgoing Republican family).

Abraham Lincoln started the Republican Party, not Dr. Dobson. Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan have most recently articulated the deareat values of conservatism, not Dr. Dobson.

Who are these people?

17 posted on 10/23/2007 12:06:04 PM PDT by angkor ("Hyeah right. The man who singlehandedly killed ManBearPig is a loser." Al Gore, South Park 10.06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Oh yea. Everytime I look for answers to great moral questions I turn to ...
... Newsweek? LOL!


18 posted on 10/23/2007 12:07:50 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Look at the facts.

Right now mediamatters and CREW are being used to go after the GOP and conservatives. Just wait until they get a hold of the DoJ, IRS, FEC, and FCC. They used IRS in the first Clinton administration, there may not be a GOP congress to watchover.

These people are stalinist. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.


19 posted on 10/23/2007 12:09:08 PM PDT by Perdogg (Join the NCAA basketball thread - Freemail me - Go tarheels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GreenOgre; Bobkk47
On election day, when the reality of a likely Hillary presidency becomes clear, evangelicals are not going to vote 3rd party.

There is a certain contingent of them here on FR who crow about and revel in the "lesson" they taught the Republican Party in 2006.

Perhaps they did. All the more reason for them to leave.

20 posted on 10/23/2007 12:09:15 PM PDT by angkor ("Hyeah right. The man who singlehandedly killed ManBearPig is a loser." Al Gore, South Park 10.06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Typical Newsweek attacking the conservative political types with no real journalism that is essentially blown up from nothing to do a hatchet job. Nothing to see here folks. Move on.


21 posted on 10/23/2007 12:10:29 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

Rush addressed this briefly today. Clinton’s negatives are so high they prohibit her election. A recent poll shows 50% of likely voters stated they would NEVER vote for her under any circumstances. It’s up from 45%. That’s a stat that guarantees defeat, unless...

UNLESS...you don’t need 51% to win. The ONLY way Clinton gets the White House is a conservative or evangelical 3rd party. Look for their accomplices in the MSM to cheerlead for this.


22 posted on 10/23/2007 12:10:58 PM PDT by henkster (The dems have reserved your place on the collective farm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

My, how the Mainstream Media has been all over this one!

In fact, they’re TRYING to build up a third-party run for conservatives.

DEMOCRAT/MSM MANTRA: If we say it enough, it will be true!


23 posted on 10/23/2007 12:12:05 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
***Sounds right.

If Hillary wins after a significant third party run by the single issue anti-abortion crowd, I'll personally enjoy reminding you of every pro-abortion judge Hillary appoints, and every new Planned Parenthood office opened.

Even if Giuliani wanted pro-abortion judges, Republican senators wouldn't support them, so they wouldn't get past the vetting process. Wild claims that Giuliani = Hillary are just ignorant.

Political parties do matter. Empowering the Republican party in the White House will do more good, and less damage, than empowering the Democrat party similarly. Regardless of the views of any individual candidate on any one issue.

24 posted on 10/23/2007 12:12:31 PM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tennteacher

ya know— it is sad that 15 years later people are still buying the lie that Perot is why Clinton won....

the truth is that Bush LOST the election- all his own doing. do recall “Read my lips”????? The fiscal conservatives ran to Perot- but only because our Republican President committed political suicide.

The MSM does a great job of keeping the social conservatives and the fiscal conservatives at odds with each other and we fall in line- blaming each other.....

when will we learn to blame the Republicans who we elect and betray us- instead of blaming each other?

The truth is that most (about 2/3) of the American voters think their leaders are too liberal- weather in the Dem or Republican party.

conservatism wins.

we just have to stop fighting each other- and put the blame where it belongs- the Republicans DC that actually need us to shut down the lines in order for them to pay attention to what we want......


25 posted on 10/23/2007 12:13:29 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (When will the leftist elites finally award Bill Clinton with the Nobel "Piece" Prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
How ya doin'?
26 posted on 10/23/2007 12:14:27 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Get real,
If you guys do the 3rd party thing and hitlery gets in then the dims will be proven right about the Christian Right.

Hitlery, more lib judges and all, think about it, JSDude1


27 posted on 10/23/2007 12:14:39 PM PDT by dusttoyou (FredHead from the git go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

Most social conservatives are also fiscally conservative.

Most fiscal conservatives believe in God and don’t hate Christians.

Personal Responsibility is at the core of both.


28 posted on 10/23/2007 12:16:54 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

“Great! The Guaranteed Democratic Win Party!”

I’m afraid that’s the GOP, regardless of whether there is a third party or not.


29 posted on 10/23/2007 12:16:59 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

And I say it’s criminal, CRIMINAL, that Barak Obama is being cut out as an option for the Democrats. I say, Obama, start your own party if you have to! Run as an independent! Show those Democrats that there is another way!

Obama for Independent!


30 posted on 10/23/2007 12:17:25 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (Free commerce is the only just way to redistribute wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Another Clinton in the WH thanks to a 3rd party candidate???
It’s the only way Hitlery can win.


31 posted on 10/23/2007 12:17:46 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (If You Support America - Thank a Soldier; If You Support Al-Qaeda - Thank a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

News WEAK! BS!


32 posted on 10/23/2007 12:17:48 PM PDT by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narby; MeekOneGOP

I’ll personally enjoy reminding you of every pro-abortion judge Hillary appoints, and every new Planned Parenthood office opened.
***Let’s see. You basically admitted you were a troll on another thread, and now you’re going to stalk me. OK. I suppose you owe Free Republic a list of people who supported aRINOld so we can stalk them. It’s only fair. I wouldn’t doubt if the folks who supported that abomination are the same who support tootyfruityRudy, and cannot learn the lesson.


33 posted on 10/23/2007 12:17:56 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

Oh, didn’t see that was you, eeevil.

How’s Hotlanta?


34 posted on 10/23/2007 12:18:03 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

I ALWAYS look to NewsWeAk to explain the intricacies of Republican politics to me. Well, usually. Sometimes, perhaps. Or, once in a while. Just who is kidding whom, anyway?


35 posted on 10/23/2007 12:18:14 PM PDT by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

'This Is Not a Bluff'- A Christian political leader on the threat of a third party.

"I'm warning you! I'll pull the trigger!"


36 posted on 10/23/2007 12:19:07 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (The Democrat Party: radical Islam's last hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
The Dems would love it if Rudy were the GOP's candidate. They need someone who is easy to beat or they need a third party candidate to split off the evangelicals who won't vote for Rudy.

A few years ago in Michigan the Dem machine got out the vote by way of the union organizers to get everyone to go vote for McCain in the primary, to defeat Bush here. To make the task easier, they pulled the Democrats out of the election and said they would choose the nominee in a caucus later on. It worked, Bush lost Michigan in the primary. Relatives of ours were crowing about how they helped kill Bush's chances here.

37 posted on 10/23/2007 12:19:15 PM PDT by Mrs. P (I am most seriously displeased. - Lady Catherine de Bourg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

agreed.....

but right now- these two groups seem to be at war over the Republican party.....or at least according to the MSM...and sadly enough- I see a lot of it here on FR...

It might be just me- but both fiscal and social conservatives- are attacked and accused of helping to create another “Perot” stlye win for the Dems....

I explain it better here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1915159/posts?page=11#11

btw— have I told you lately that YOU ROCK!!!???


38 posted on 10/23/2007 12:20:52 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (When will the leftist elites finally award Bill Clinton with the Nobel "Piece" Prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Well, thank God evangelicals are not stupid, and will never let Hill and Bill reign as our CICs’.

They will not do that to our guys out in two war theaters sweating and bleeding.

But Christian “leaders” who speak to Newsweek, an enemy publication, are another story.

39 posted on 10/23/2007 12:21:48 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

Right now- Hotlanta is GREAT!!

(MNJohnnie is here visiting!!)

;-)


40 posted on 10/23/2007 12:21:59 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (When will the leftist elites finally award Bill Clinton with the Nobel "Piece" Prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: angkor
The whole agenda of this article is to divide and conquer. It sounds as if you have bitten. That is okay though we all take this content the drive by media at times dishes out as real on occasion. The truth is this is just not true there is no big movement to get respect and blah, blah, blah loads of conservative Christians trying to start a third party to get their way etc. This is just horse hooey and meant to set you off at conservative Christians. Might there be a few out there? Sure. That does not make it real on a larger scale.

DIVIDE AND CONQUER! Do not bite.

Remember the media is generally all fighting for a liberal president here and they are part of the machine to make that happen.

I do respect your frustration and comments, we have a big tent in the GOP. We will all come together on voting day and make sure no liberal candidate gets the presidency. PERIOD. By the way I think they should add another "voters" type vote called "FISCAL VOTERS" where we weigh the candidates on their fiscal policies etc.

As a conservative Christian I like all the ways we evaluate our candidates. The more examination and evaluation the better. The more information in which to make decisions. By the way just because one wins or loses in the Value Voters arena doesn't make them the candidate for a conservative Christian. People just get a sense of how each candidate is viewed in this light. Their are other lights as well. Sometimes one weighs many areas, some weigh just a few. We are all only human after all. :-)

41 posted on 10/23/2007 12:22:28 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

Tell him his buddy RITM said “Hey!”


42 posted on 10/23/2007 12:23:44 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

Something going on here...you two...


43 posted on 10/23/2007 12:24:20 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

WILL DO!!!


44 posted on 10/23/2007 12:24:37 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (When will the leftist elites finally award Bill Clinton with the Nobel "Piece" Prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jeddavis
Two words: RUNOFF ELECTIONS.....

Two words: DIMS WIN.....

45 posted on 10/23/2007 12:24:37 PM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
Most social conservatives are also fiscally conservative.

Most fiscal conservatives believe in God and don’t hate Christians.

Personal Responsibility is at the core of both.

Great point and well said. :-)

46 posted on 10/23/2007 12:25:49 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: padre35

“The next President will have at least two (2) Supreme Court Nominations, no way anyone who cares about life puts Hillary in charge of selecting who they will be.”

Makes sense. I sincerely hope you’re right.


47 posted on 10/23/2007 12:26:11 PM PDT by tennteacher (Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Will this mean no more compassionate conservatism?

If so I'm all for it.

48 posted on 10/23/2007 12:27:24 PM PDT by Brellium ("Thou shalt not shilly shally!" Aron Nimzowitsch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: padre35
The next President will have at least two (2) Supreme Court Nominations, no way anyone who cares about life puts Hillary in charge of selecting who they will be.

I predict that with so many Republican senators deciding to retire and with the conservatives' displeasure with the senate's immigration "reform" push, come 2009 the senate will have a solid democrat majority. They will be able to easily block any conservative nominee to the supreme court. Recall how the senate blocked Bork under Reagan and Haynesworth and Carswell under Nixon.

49 posted on 10/23/2007 12:30:23 PM PDT by trane250
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Look at these clowns. Who says God doesn’t have a sense of humor?


50 posted on 10/23/2007 12:33:08 PM PDT by Crawdad (I cried because I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-278 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson