Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Public Utility Control Decision Could Cost Connecticut 1300 Jobs
FreedomWorks.org ^ | 10-23-2007 | Adam Brandon

Posted on 10/23/2007 1:16:57 PM PDT by bstein80

In a surprising anti-consumer decision, the Connecticut Department of Public Utility (CDPU) rejected AT&T’s application to expand its U-verse IPTV service further across Connecticut. This is surprising because AT&T was granted a statewide video franchise, but the CDPU shockingly classified IPTV as a cable offering.

By forcing IPTV to conform to 1970’s era regulatory standards designed for cable monopolies, the CDPU and state attorney general have sided against competition and the free market.

Connecticut is the only state to consider IPTV a cable system, and therefore it is not covered under video franchise law. Unfortunately for Connecticut’s consumers, this decision will prompt AT&T to stop investing in Connecticut’s telecom sector, terminating 1300 jobs and ending service to over 7000 consumers rather than attempt to comply with recalcitrant bureaucratic regulators.

FreedomWorks Chairman Dick Armey visited Connecticut earlier in the week to meet with lawmakers committed to shrinking government and giving consumers choice in the marketplace. Armey commented, “Connecticut’s citizens deserve the right to choose products in the marketplace, and state legislators agree with them. Unfortunately, the bureaucrats have decided otherwise.”

FreedomWorks President Matt Kibbe added:

“Special interest groups will not easily give in to consumer interest and give up protected markets. In its bizarre ruling, the CDPU is violating the spirit of the statewide video franchise law, putting a thousand jobs at risk, and deterring investment from Connecticut’s internet backbone. The CDPU needs to remember it works for the citizens of Connecticut, not the other way around.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: bureaucrats; connecticut; jobs; telecommunications

1 posted on 10/23/2007 1:17:00 PM PDT by bstein80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bstein80
An odd bureaucratic decision - follow the money time?
2 posted on 10/23/2007 1:27:00 PM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bstein80
"state attorney general have sided against competition and the free market."

Attorney General Dick Blumenthal is a total wasted of oxygen use, this putz wants to produce nothing but headlines and could care less about the residents of the state of Connecticut.

3 posted on 10/23/2007 2:26:20 PM PDT by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson