Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foster child to be taken away because Christian couple refuse to teach him about homosexuality
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=489285&in_page_id=1770&ito=1490 ^

Posted on 10/23/2007 9:32:53 PM PDT by Def Conservative

Foster child to be taken away because Christian couple refuse to teach him about homosexuality By JAMES MILLS

They are devoted foster parents with an unblemished record of caring for almost 30 vulnerable children.

But Vincent and Pauline Matherick will this week have their latest foster son taken away because they have refused to sign new sexual equality regulations.

To do so, they claim, would force them to promote homosexuality and go against their Christian faith.

The 11-year-old boy, who has been in their care for two years, will be placed in a council hostel this week and the Mathericks will no longer be given children to look after.

The devastated couple, who have three grown up children of their own, became foster parents in 2001 and have since cared for 28 children at their home in Chard, Somerset.

Earlier this year, Somerset County Council's social services department asked them to sign a contract to implement Labour's new Sexual Orientation Regulations, part of the Equality Act 2006, which make discrimination on the grounds of sexuality illegal.

Officials told the couple that under the regulations they would be required to discuss same-sex relationships with children as young as 11 and tell them that gay partnerships were just as acceptable as heterosexual marriages.

They could also be required to take teenagers to gay association meetings.

When the Mathericks objected, they were told they would be taken off the register of foster parents.

The Mathericks have decided to resign rather than face the humiliation of being expelled.

Mr Matherick, a 65-year-old retired travel agent and a primary school governor, said: "I simply could not agree to do it because it is against my central beliefs.

"We have never discriminated against anybody but I cannot preach the benefits of homosexuality when I believe it is against the word of God."

Mrs Matherick, 61, said they had asked if they could continue looking after their foster son until he is found a permanent home, but officials refused and he will be placed in a council hostel on Friday.

She said: "He was very upset to begin with. We are all very close, but he's a mature young man and he's dealing with it."

The couple, who have six grandchildren and one greatgrandchild, are both ministers at the nonconformist South Chard Christian Church.

When they first started fostering they took in young single mothers and their babies.

More recently they have been caring for children of primary school age.

Mr Matherick added: "It's terrible that we've been forced into this corner. It just should not happen.

"There are not enough foster carers around anyway without these rules.

"They were saying that we had to be prepared to talk about sexuality with 11-year-olds, which I don't think is appropriate anyway, but not only that, to be prepared to explain how gay people date.

"They said we would even have to take a teenager to gay association meetings.

"How can I do that when it's totally against what I believe?"

Religious campaigners say the couple are the latest victims of an equality drive which puts gay rights above religious beliefs.

Christian, Jewish and Muslim leaders have complained that the rules force them to overturn long-held beliefs.

The Mathericks are planning to fight their case in the courts with the backing of the Lawyers' Christian Fellowship.

The same organisation is backing Christian magistrate Andrew McClintock who resigned from the family courts in a row over gay adoption.

He says he was forced to resign because he was not allowed to opt out of cases where he might have to send a child to live with gay parents.

{R}

The Mathericks' case comes at a time when there is a chronic shortage of foster parents, who work on a voluntary basis.

An extra 8,000 are needed to plug the gaps in the service.

Researchers have found that continually moving children from home to home can have a devastating impact on their education and general welfare.

But a report last year revealed that the shortage of carers meant that some children in care are being forced to move up to three times a year.

David Taylor, Somerset County Council's corporate director for children and young people, said: "No decision has been made about the deregistration of Mr and Mrs Matherick.

"The council is committed to promoting the interests of children and young people and welcomes foster carers from all backgrounds and faiths."

Find this story at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=489285&in_page_id=1770 ©2007 Associated Ne


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: adoption; children; christophobia; culture; europeanchristians; gaystapo; gaystapotactics; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; indoctrination; moralabsolutes; parentalrights; perverts; pinkmafia; sexualizingchildren; tolerantleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 next last
To: Marysecretary

I had the same thought.


141 posted on 10/24/2007 12:03:52 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Political Correctness is criminal insanity writ large.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

How tragic, child abuse by force of government.


142 posted on 10/24/2007 12:33:00 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative
Subvert, dude! And shame on you who have adopted the use of the euphemism 'merry', or some synomym to describe pederasty and fudge packing. The foster parents should teach the child about the meaning of the word 'gay'. (I realize that some of you will have to pull out a dictionsry.) Subvert the dominant paradigm!
143 posted on 10/24/2007 12:37:31 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto

“Totalitarianism.”

I would not be surprised if next, they will be doing that with a couples’ biological children, as well.


144 posted on 10/24/2007 1:03:28 PM PDT by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative
Who are the people trying to enforce this?

Find out and FIRE them!!!

145 posted on 10/24/2007 2:01:46 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joya
30 years ago, in my freshman biology class, I was required to study and be tested on evolution. I was advised by other Christian students to answer the questions per the theory of evolution so as to show I’d studied and comprehended the topic, while still holding to my own creationist beliefs in my heart. I did so, and went on with my life.

I taught a senior-high Sunday School class in church for several years, and advised the students along similar lines. I told them they are not being tested on what they believe; rather they were being tested on whether they had learned the material. I suppose the couple could have tried that, but when I read in the article that “they could also be required to take teenagers to gay association meetings”, it became apparent that it's "game over" for this couple.

146 posted on 10/24/2007 2:02:15 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
The government shouldn’t be telling foster parents what they can and can’t teach children.

Why not?

They sure tell public schools what they can and cannot teach!

147 posted on 10/24/2007 2:02:35 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chasio649
It’s not you....believe me...i see it everyday and struggle to keep a sense of humor.

There's your problem - get MAD!

REAL mad!!

148 posted on 10/24/2007 2:04:18 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

You left out....

“RESIST the devil and he will flee from you.”


149 posted on 10/24/2007 2:05:13 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hornitos
Um, “taxation without representation” comes to mind.

Yup...

"Taxation WITH representation” has really worked out well!

150 posted on 10/24/2007 2:08:13 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Wanna bet this stops once it gets the Mooselimbs into an uproar?

No.

151 posted on 10/24/2007 2:08:51 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Why not?

They sure tell public schools what they can and cannot teach!


Ha! You've got me there. But then again, look at how the schools turned out.

Of course, I believe in the privatization of schools, so that's really a non-argument for me.
152 posted on 10/24/2007 2:10:26 PM PDT by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: mort56
 
 What about tolerance of beliefs?
 
Like THIS??
 

 

Genesis 13:13       Now the men of Sodom were wicked and were sinning greatly against the LORD.

Genesis 18:20-21
20. Then the LORD said, "The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and
their sin so grievous
21. that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. If not, I will know."

Genesis 19:4-7
4. Before they had gone to bed,
all the men from every part of the city of Sodom--both young and old--surrounded the house.
5. They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight?
Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."
6. Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him
7. and said, "No, my friends.
Don't do this wicked thing.

 

Psalms 12:8      The wicked freely strut about when what is vile is honored among men.

Ain't this just FABULOUS??      More?

 

Isaiah 3:9   The look on their faces testifies against them; they parade their sin like Sodom; they do not hide it. Woe to them! They have brought disaster upon themselves.

2 Peter 2:13b  Their idea of pleasure is to carouse in broad daylight. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their pleasures while they feast with you.


 

 

Ezekiel 16:49-50
49. "`Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.
50. They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen.



2 Peter 2

 1.  But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them--bringing swift destruction on themselves.
 2.  Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute.
 3.  In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.
 4.  For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell,  putting them into gloomy dungeons  to be held for judgment;
 5.  if he did not spare the ancient world when he brought the flood on its ungodly people, but protected Noah, a preacher of righteousness, and seven others;
 6.  if he condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah by burning them to ashes, and made them an example of what is going to happen to the ungodly;
 7.  and if he rescued Lot, a righteous man, who was distressed by the filthy lives of lawless men
 8.  (for that righteous man, living among them day after day, was tormented in his righteous soul by the lawless deeds he saw and heard)--
 9.  if this is so, then the Lord knows how to rescue godly men from trials and to hold the unrighteous for the day of judgment, while continuing their punishment.
 10.  This is especially true of those who follow the corrupt desire of the sinful nature  and despise authority.   Bold and arrogant, these men are not afraid to slander celestial beings;
 11.  yet even angels, although they are stronger and more powerful, do not bring slanderous accusations against such beings in the presence of the Lord.
 12.  But these men blaspheme in matters they do not understand. They are like brute beasts, creatures of instinct, born only to be caught and destroyed, and like beasts they too will perish.
 13.  They will be paid back with harm for the harm they have done.
Their idea of pleasure is to carouse in broad daylight. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their pleasures while they feast with you.



 

But there IS hope!!!

1 Corinthians 6:9-11

 9. Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived:
     Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
10. nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
11. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

 


If you could NOT change, you would be in most pitiful shape.....


153 posted on 10/24/2007 2:10:30 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: river rat; stevio
—— all the way to my post #31, which was removed....

It appears that #31 endorsed VIOLENCE - for Sharia law was mentioned.

154 posted on 10/24/2007 2:13:22 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
When such unjust laws are passed, it behooves Christians to start operating outside the law.

No, it behooves Christians to get off their lazy asses and take back this country!

155 posted on 10/24/2007 2:14:23 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

bttt


156 posted on 10/24/2007 2:14:25 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
Problem is though, not enough people speak out and we let a minority rule.

There ya go!

What ever happened to that DOMINION idea?

157 posted on 10/24/2007 2:15:34 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
It’s coming ALREADY here folks.
158 posted on 10/24/2007 2:16:25 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative
"The council is committed to promoting the interests of children and young people and welcomes foster carers from all backgrounds and faiths."

Apparently not. Then again, this might be another case of religion that the left doesn't mind so long as it doesn't actually require it's adherents to believe anything.
159 posted on 10/24/2007 2:17:42 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

well in this case the children do belong to the government not the foster parents.


160 posted on 10/24/2007 2:17:42 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson