Skip to comments.
Bread and butter issue: Rising prices may herald the first global food shortage since the 1970s
FT ^
| 10/23/07
| Jenny Wiggins and Javier Blas in London
Posted on 10/24/2007 10:53:18 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
When the United Nations held its annual World Food Day last week to publicise the plight of the 854m malnourished people around the world, its warning that there “are still too many hungry people” was a little more anxious than usual.
Finding food to feed the hungry is becoming an increasingly difficult task as growing demand for staples such as wheat, corn and rice brings higher prices. That is leading all nations – rich and poor – to compete for food supplies.
Food security is not a new concern for countries that have battled political instability, droughts or wars. But for the first time since the early 1970s, when there were global food shortages, it is starting to concern more stable nations as well. “The whole global picture is flagging up signals that we’re moving out of a period of abundant food supply into a period in which food is going to be in much shorter supply,” says Henry Fell, chairman of Britain’s Commercial Farmers Group.
As agricultural commodities trade at record high levels, causing one food manufacturer after another to put up prices – Danone, the French dairy group, this month became the latest to reflect the severity of the cost increases when it said it would increase prices by 10 per cent – countries are starting to question whether they can afford to keep feeding themselves.
Wheat and milk prices have surged to all-time highs while those for corn and soyabeans stand at well above their 1990s averages. Rice and coffee have jumped to 10-year records and meat prices have risen recently by up to 50 per cent in some countries.
“The world is gradually losing the buffer that it used to have to protect against big swings [in the market],” says Abdolreza Abbassian, secretary of the grains trading group at the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation. “There is a sense of panic.”

Some of the price rises are the result of temporary problems, such as drought in Australia, and diseases, such as blue-ear in Chinese pigs. But there is a more permanent increase in demand from Asia, as richer populations in China and India demand more protein, and from the biofuel industry, which is on course to consume about 30 per cent of the US corn crop in 2010 – developments that will underpin prices for the medium term.
The FAO estimates that those structural new trends will help to push the cost of agricultural commodities in the next decade between 20 and 50 per cent above their last 10-year average.
This is a problem for economies where food represents a significant share of their imports payments. The International Monetary Fund says higher food prices are hurting poorer nations in Africa, such as Benin and Niger, as well as a number of countries in Asia, from Bangladesh to China itself, and parts of the Middle East.
The difficulties are compounded because the importance of food in overall consumer spending is negatively correlated with income levels (see chart). For example, food is more than 60 per cent of the “consumption basket” measured by economists in sub-Saharan Africa, whereas it is 30 per cent in China and only 10 per cent in the US, according to the IMF.
For countries that export grains and other commodities, such as the US, Australia or Canada but also Argentina and Namibia, high prices are lucrative at a macroeconomic level and for the businesses and farmers involved. But there, too, consumers suffer. In Italy, which imports around half its durum wheat needs, people took to the streets this summer to protest at higher pasta, bread and milk prices.
Grain exporting countries have consequently started restricting the amount of grain they export, postponing sales or imposing in some cases prohibitive export tariffs to keep their local market well supplied, avoiding politically damaging food price increases.
In Russia, which faces parliamentary elections in December and where President Vladimir Putin has said he was “worried about price growth, especially food prices growth”, the government has introduced export duties on wheat and barley and is discussing further tariff increases. Russian food retailers, under pressure from the Kremlin, have meanwhile agreed to freeze prices on some basic foodstuffs to help cool down inflation.
Neighbouring Ukraine is considering export quotas on corn, barley and wheat.

At the same time, food importing countries have started to look for ways to increase their domestic production or build emergency stocks as a buffer against sharp price increases or shortages. For example, Pakistan plans to import more wheat than it does normally to make sure it has enough to feed its population. India has also bought more than necessary in order to build up its stocks.
The European Union has suspended its “set-aside” rules that bar farmers from planting cereals on 10 per cent of their land. The rules were designed to avoid overproduction but Brussels is now worried that there will not be enough cereals to meet demand. In the US, however, the Department of Agriculture has decided against allowing land to be released early from the Conservation Reserve Program that, similarly to the EU’s set-aside, pays farmers not to plant on some of their arable land.
Analysts and traders say farmers are likely in the 2008 crop season to plant more wheat at the expense of cotton and, to a lesser extent, corn, barley and soyabeans. This means that, while wheat prices may fall next year, crops such as cotton and corn might jump in value because of the reduced supplies.
State finances are also being imperilled, as countries that import much of their food have started to increase subsidies paid to food producers to compensate for higher costs and scrapped import tariffs. Akhter Ahmed, a subsidies expert at the International Food Policy Research Institute, a Washington-based think-tank, says international agricultural prices are directly linked to the cost of food importing countries’ subsidies. “The recent price increase is going to be a drain for government budgets,” he warns.
The FAO has forecast that the lower-income “food-deficit” countries will next year spend more than $28bn (£14bn, €20bn) on importing cereals, double what they spent in 2002. “The combination of higher export prices and soaring freight rates is pushing up domestic prices of bread and other basic food in importing developing countries, which has caused social unrest in parts,” the organisation said in its latest Crop Prospects and Food Situation report.
Egypt, which experienced the “Bread Intifada” riots in 1977 when the government raised bread prices, last month said it was increasing the subsidies it pays to bread producers in the light of ongoing increases in global wheat prices.
Certainly, there is currently little chance of subsidies being lowered by many developing countries. Abah Ofon of Standard Chartered Bank says that for countries such as Morocco, where a large proportion of the population lives close to or below the poverty line, wheat is a staple part of people’s diet and therefore “eradicating subsidies is tantamount to political suicide at this stage”.
In China, the government is providing larger subsidies to farmers to increase agricultural production, particularly of pork and milk after the country suffered a price spike this year. Beijing also plans to increase subsidies to low-income urban residents and student cafeterias while it has cut soyabean import duties in order to keep prices down.
Commodity analysts in part blame the US and Europe for the current price increases. They say the heavy subsidies placed on agricultural produce by the American and European governments in recent decades have made investment in agriculture unprofitable for many other countries because they have found it hard to compete.
Jeffrey Currie, head of commodities research at Goldman Sachs, says the relatively low investment in agriculture outside the US and Europe is coming back to haunt European and US consumers in the form of higher food prices as global supplies of agricultural produce fall behind demand.
The world’s leading agricultural exporters are the EU (led by France, the Netherlands, Germany and the UK) and the US, followed by Brazil, Canada and Australia.
“The US and Europe were exporting agricultural deflation; now they’re exporting agricultural inflation,” Mr Currie says.
The IMF adds that western countries’ biofuel policies are also behind the current problem. “One country’s policy to promote biofuels while protecting its farmers could increase another, likely poorer, country’s import bills for food and pose additional risks to inflation or growth,” says the institution in its latest World Economic Outlook.
This impact would be mitigated if the US and the EU reduced barriers to biofuel imports from developing countries, such as Brazil, where production is cheaper, more efficient and environmentally less damaging, the IMF adds.
In the near future, demand for agricultural raw materials is likely to continue rising in world markets as countries that have previously been able to meet their own food needs start importing more, increasing the global challenge of feeding populations. Don Mitchell, an economist at the World Bank, says: “Although China and India are relatively self-sufficient in food, some economists doubt that this can continue as incomes rise and [think] that they will need to rely much more on imports.”
The FAO expects India to import more wheat and China to increase imports of coarse grains to supply feed to its livestock industry. Both countries are also expected to increase imports of oils that are used in food production, such as palm oil. The World Bank estimates that cereal production will have to rise by nearly 50 per cent and meat output by 85 per cent between 2000 and 2030 to meet projected global demand.
Developed countries are not immune. In the UK, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs acknowledged in a December paper that food security was becoming a “matter of concern”.
Kate Bailey of Chatham House, the London think-tank, says Britain’s food supply is facing “huge change” due to shifts in global trade patterns. Policymakers may have to return to thinking about food as a “strategic asset”, she adds – even in a nation that has not been self-sufficient in food since the Industrial Revolution.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foodprice; foodshortage; tlr
To: Hydroshock
2
posted on
10/24/2007 10:53:41 PM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Perhaps the price of corn and other cereals would not be as high if... we weren’t mandating that we burn ethanol in our gas tanks.
Which drives the price of corn up... which leads farmers (who want to make money) to plant the crops (corn) that are selling at the highest price.
Which then drives up the price of other crops, as there isn’t enough farmland currently to pick up the slack.
3
posted on
10/24/2007 11:34:32 PM PDT
by
gogogodzilla
(Republicans are just Socialism-lite.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
One thing is certain - prices aren’t going to be getting any lower in the near future.
So, when we see those ‘two-fers’ on products that we use or consume regularly, we may want to take advantage of the price, and do a little stock up.
4
posted on
10/24/2007 11:44:44 PM PDT
by
yorkie
To: gogogodzilla
Government shouldn’t be creating artificial demand.
At the same time, if prices of wheat and other common staples go up, more farmers will grow it and supply will increase. That’s what free markets do.
5
posted on
10/24/2007 11:49:09 PM PDT
by
DB
To: gogogodzilla
You’re onto something there. The sad part is that ethanol isn’t necessary. But I guess that’s the way it goes.
6
posted on
10/24/2007 11:59:07 PM PDT
by
squidly
To: squidly
Just another reason ethanol is a bad idea.....for our cars AND our economy.....
To: gogogodzilla
Any country stupid enough to burn food as fuel has idiots making policy. The worst part is we have actual fuel that could be available if those same idiotic policy makers wouldn't have placed potential oil fields off limits. We could earnestly try to develop extraction methods for the
Green River Formation where the US has some 1 trillion barrels of oil (3 times the reserves of the Saudis) locked into shale.
We could have lessened our dependence on oil and natural gas if the idiots making policy hadn't cowed to the watermelons regarding nuclear generation. We have listened for too long the those who "care" for the planet and every living thing (except for humans). It's time to remind those forced to pay ever higher prices for energy and food why those prices are higher than they should be and who's policies of environmentalism have brought us to such a reliance on foreign oil.
To: TigerLikesRooster
The basis for this article is false. There is no more a “shortage” of food then there is a “shortage” of water. If anyone lacks sufficient food (or water for that matter), it is due to their inability, or unwillingness to afford it. We can have, for example, all the corn we want if we are willing to pay more for it than the local ethanol refinery.
The real story is how many millions of people have been denied, by their governments and societies, the opportunity or even the ability to earn enough to take care of their basic needs.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Well, duh....the price of energy is following the same trend as food, especially oil, gasoline, diesel, and natural gas, and as those specific engine fuels shoot up in prices, so does the cost of planting, cultivating, harvesting, transport of raw foods and processed foods.
Food, water, and energy, China will throw the first stone 9Russian territories in the far east) and they continue to destroy their environment with pollution.
10
posted on
10/25/2007 4:45:29 AM PDT
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: TigerLikesRooster
It’s good that we are trying to save the world from “global warming” by putting food in our gas tanks.
11
posted on
10/25/2007 4:45:40 AM PDT
by
HenpeckedCon
(Can I please freep just a little while longer Dear?)
To: theBuckwheat
As long as the government mandates the use of ethanol, the refineries WILL pay whatever price necessary to get the corn.
And multi-billion dollar industries have deeper pockets that you or I.
So who do you think will end up with the corn? You... or the refinery?
12
posted on
10/25/2007 6:09:40 AM PDT
by
gogogodzilla
(Republicans are just Socialism-lite.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Never underestimate the American farmer’s ability to overproduce!
The local corn price here is $2.57/bushel. Not much higher than usual. The markets did their job. The best cure for high prices is high prices. There are ethanol plants suspending operations because the price of corn is too high relative to the ethanol price. It doen’t appear they can pay any price. All of you need to get a clue.
To: gogogodzilla; HenpeckedCon; RSmithOpt; Sgt_Schultze; squidly
and from the biofuel industry, which is on course to consume about 30 per cent of the US corn crop in 2010 We need to keep saying it until it sinks in to the average folks...
The earth is awash in fuel resourses, stop BURNING our friggin food !!!
14
posted on
10/25/2007 6:51:58 AM PDT
by
Gilbo_3
(A few Rams must look after the sheep 'til the Good Shepherd returns...)
To: gogogodzilla
as there isnt enough farmland currently to pick up the slack. We have WAY more farmland than we need to produce our food.
We have so much farmland, and production capacity that we can be so foolish as to raise 'organic' foods, which requires twice as much land to produce the same quantity of lower quality foods.
We have so much farmland that we can even BURN a lot of our feedstuffs, and still have excess.
The rest of the world is too stupid to install a capitalistic economic system, and as a result they are always on the verge of starvation.
Let the stupid people starve to death.
As they do so, lets flaunt our capacity to produce a tsunami of grains and our foodstuffs. Lets raise organic, lets burn our food, and lets all gorge ourselves on the most abundant and best foods ever raised in the entire history of the world.
HATS OFF TO THE AMERICAN FARMER!
15
posted on
10/25/2007 7:11:38 AM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: gogogodzilla
the refineries WILL pay whatever price necessary to get the corn. Ah, it's not really a good idea for posters to flaunt their own ignorance.
16
posted on
10/25/2007 7:13:29 AM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: clodkicker
However, as with the housing bust / mortgage fraud, never underestimate the middle-man's ability to skim (inflate) the true cost of a gallon of hooch for your 'Mustang' and flip off the farmer at the same time.
Then, common folk will flip-off the middle-man and then feed the corn bought from the co-op to their horses and make their own 'shine to fuel their vehicles with hand pumps and in the meantime, thin their blood while waitin' on the mash to sour up. Ain't hard to do. Gonna be a lot off copper layin' around in houses that people can't buy.
Just make the juice in the winter and heat the house at the same time.....maybe a basement with a large fireplace and use it as a tax deduction for an at home office / business.
Hell' I figure if the gov ain't gonna enforce immigration laws, then why bother with the manufacture of spirits? Gonna be some rich farmers an a huge demand for cast iron bathtubs for the DIY'rs.
17
posted on
10/25/2007 7:13:50 AM PDT
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: Balding_Eagle
"HATS OFF TO THE AMERICAN FARMER!"BUMP!!!
BUMP!!>
BUMP!!
18
posted on
10/25/2007 7:16:15 AM PDT
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: theBuckwheat
19
posted on
10/25/2007 7:23:28 AM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: theBuckwheat
Don’t go using common sense and truth to take away anyone’s misplaced outrage. :-}
20
posted on
10/25/2007 7:33:11 AM PDT
by
tiki
To: TigerLikesRooster
High prices serve as a signal to produce more. You’d think the FT might be aware of that.
21
posted on
10/25/2007 10:41:13 AM PDT
by
BfloGuy
(It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Rising prices are also often just the result of inflation. The value of any soft currency tends to decrease over time, making prices rise independent of any other factor.
Creating food is rarely a problem (on a large scale).
Distribution is frequently a problem.
Someone have a link to the worldwide Big Mac Index?
22
posted on
10/25/2007 12:41:46 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
To: RSmithOpt
Why bother with the legal iffyness of ‘hooch?
Wine, mead, hard cider ... all rediculously easy to make, and legal in very generous personal quantities.
(Gotta whip up another batch of mead tonight ... dissolve 1x honey in 3x water, add $0.25 of champagne yeast, dump in glass jug with $1 airlock, wait a month or so, bottle or consume as desired.)
23
posted on
10/25/2007 12:46:49 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
To: TigerLikesRooster
We're all gonna' starve!
24
posted on
10/25/2007 12:48:40 PM PDT
by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: TigerLikesRooster
Grains are one of the few commodities that have been at the same price for decades. A few years ago, the price of corn was the same as it my Dad got in the early 70’s.
It is funny that many hear scream “Good times” when gas goes up, and “Da$% farmers” when grain goes up.
25
posted on
10/25/2007 3:23:00 PM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: RSmithOpt
You can make your own fuel ethanol, but to make it right (with low enough moisture as to protect your engine) is a bit difficult.
And if you own an alcohol still, be prepared for a lot of guys with guns and badges to show up and cart you off to jail. The ATF does not like moonshiners, they don’t pay taxes. Unlike illegal immigration, the state and federal government take that very seriously.
Now, if you have access to a lot of grease and own a diesel, it is pretty easy to make your own.
26
posted on
10/25/2007 3:27:19 PM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This article MUST be a lie. We are buried in so much food we now have to burn it in our gas tanks. </sarcasm>
To: ctdonath2
I make my own beer from time to time lagers mainly, but, ales too ..... 7 gallon batches averaging 5.5-6.2% from the hydromenter readings and naturally carbonated after bottling.
28
posted on
10/26/2007 5:08:34 AM PDT
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Yet politicians insist on turning food into fuel and PAYING farmers to NOT GROW CROPS!?!?!?
29
posted on
10/26/2007 5:11:07 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Remove all price controls, production controls and ‘farm aid’ programs and you will see the level of production rise to the point that there will be no shortage.
It’s been shown that there has never been a large-scale famine that didn’t have, at its heart, some political insanity. This is no different
30
posted on
10/26/2007 5:15:39 AM PDT
by
WileyC
To: johnny7
No, we are just going to pay more for fuel, food, and ethanol because Congress is still in the low water toilet mode. They give us solutions that are worse than the problem.
31
posted on
10/26/2007 5:18:00 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
To: DB
if prices of wheat and other common staples go up, more farmers will grow it and supply will increase. Thats what free markets do And it will be less economical to plow farmland under for subdivisions. The "no-growth" folks will be pleased (yeah, right!).
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson