Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear Submarine Commander Removed
The Guardian (UK) ^ | 10-26-2007 | Chelsea J Carter

Posted on 10/25/2007 7:39:15 PM PDT by blam

Nuclear Submarine Commander Removed

Friday October 26, 2007 3:16 AM

By CHELSEA J. CARTER

Associated Press Writer

LOS ANGELES (AP) - The commanding officer of the nuclear-powered submarine USS Hampton was relieved of his duty Thursday because of a loss of confidence in his leadership, the Navy said.

Cmdr. Michael B. Portland was relieved of duty after a U.S. Navy investigation found the ship failed to do daily safety checks on its nuclear reactor for a month and falsified records to cover up the omission.

``His oversight of the crew's performance did not identify these issues'' on his own, Navy Lt. Alli Myrick, a public affairs officer, told The Associated Press. Portland's commanders identified the problems during a routine review, she said.

It appears from a preliminary investigation on the Hampton that sailors in Submarine Squadron 11 had skipped the required analysis of the chemical and radiological properties of the submarine's reactor for more than a month, even though a daily check is required.

The Hampton, a Los Angeles Class submarine assigned to Submarine Squadron Eleven, is the most advanced nuclear attack submarine in the world, carrying a torpedo, cruise missile, and mine-laying arsenal, according to information on the Navy's Web site. The submarine is docked in San Diego.

Portland's dismissal as commander is effective immediately. Myrick said Portland will be temporarily assigned to squadron duty and the Hampton will not conduct operations until the Navy can confirm the operational standards have been met. Myrick said at no time was the submarine conducting unsafe operations.

``He has not been charged with any offense nor has he received non-judicial punishment,'' Myrick said.

There was no phone listing for Portland in San Diego, and the Navy did not immediately respond to an AP interview request.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: badlink; commander; nuclear; removed; submarine; usn; usshampton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Ronin

Yep.


41 posted on 10/26/2007 8:03:04 AM PDT by Badeye ('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Looks like they couldn’t avoid burning just the blueshirts this time. Lots of khakis going down with them.


42 posted on 10/26/2007 9:43:21 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

‘Looks like they couldn’t avoid burning just the blueshirts this time. Lots of khakis going down with them.’

Any other issue, they could just nail the blues. Not when it involves nuke, in any capacity.

Rightly so. And as some of us know, the competition for this type of a command is unbelievably tough. Long line of replacements just waiting for a change of command, or the occasional implosion of a Naval Career...which this appears to be in spades.


43 posted on 10/26/2007 9:51:10 AM PDT by Badeye ('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth
The was a pretty easy call by the Navy on a very serious matter. Even though HAMPTON is a high-profile command, the same would have happened to any CO on any boat.

Glad the Navy got it right this time.

Many years ago... Aboard the tin can on which I served, I know that our CO (O-5), in whom we had a lot of confidence, was replaced by what many of us regarded to be a, um, less than inspiring leader (also an O-5).

The first CO? Bounced after making the next promotion.

The replacement? Currently a relatively famous three star Admiral.

Ugh.

44 posted on 10/26/2007 10:03:48 AM PDT by Impugn (I am standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blam

What were these guys doing for the month? We are not at war requiring the use of a submarine. Were the crew just crusing around playing cards while on duty? How hard is it to just do the job you were hired to do?


45 posted on 10/26/2007 10:12:12 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impugn
The first CO? Bounced after making the next promotion.

Don't get me started.

Seeing "CO" and "bounced" so close together reminds me of electric floor buffers and the 'Officer's Country' passageway.

I need my aol icons. :-(
46 posted on 10/26/2007 12:25:35 PM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

Well hell, she’s been advising her dad on nuclear policy since the 70’s......


47 posted on 10/26/2007 12:26:49 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Yes, I remember Jimmy saying I asked Amy “what we should do about atomic bombs?”.
48 posted on 10/26/2007 12:44:48 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
If you want to seriously reduce the shelf-life of your Navy career, go right ahead grape off the paperwork. If there was any justice in the world, the offenders would find themselves standing midwatches topside in Groton, in the dead of winter.

There: fixed it for you! Heh heh, BTDT. (Not radioing logs - just topside at night on the froze-over Thames River. Now I remember why I'm glad to be in Tucson!)

49 posted on 10/26/2007 4:39:58 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru (I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: burzum; Sursam Abordine; Doohickey
If they caught something like this on an ORSE then they probably lost their "reactor keys" underway and had to return to port on the diesel. Ouch! In any case, I would not want to be in the Engineering Department of that ship right now. Their lives are going to be hell for the next year or two. I don't feel that bad for them though. Every EOOW, EWS, EDO, and EDPO had to know what was going on or at least suspected that the logs weren't being maintained. I don't think they were necessarily complicit, but I do think they probably had the attitude that they didn't want to know.

Let's just say that Naval Reactors isn't going to be happy that there is now an international news story that says that the crew "failed to do daily safety checks on its nuclear reactor for a month and falsified records to cover up the omission." Nope, Adm. Donald will probably not be amused.

That's a fact, burzum. The last sentence of the news article is:
'Portland will be replaced by Cmdr. William J. Houston, who previously was assigned as a special assistant to the Director of the Naval Reactors.' [my emphasis added]

It appears that Adm Donald has put one of his right-hand men in charge as Hampton's scourge. I wouldn't want to be any crewman on that boat right now, much less a nuke.

Also, from other traffic I've seen, your supposition about the dirty deed being discovered during an ORSE is correct. (ORSE, for non sub types, is Operational Reactors Safeguard Examination. It is typically scheduled at the end of extended deployments.)

50 posted on 10/26/2007 5:00:45 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru (I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
I first read this story yesterday by the AP. I was going to post it here but it said it was copyrighted so I did not bother.
51 posted on 10/26/2007 5:22:03 PM PDT by tryon1ja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

I agree. Some of the items were so much a waste of time we never did them.


52 posted on 10/26/2007 5:24:56 PM PDT by tryon1ja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

He was a very bad commander to let his crew slack off like that.

Those guys are beyond intense. You are talking about nuclear power, nuclear weapons in a vessel that is subject to environmental conditions beyond your comprehension. Attack boat skippers are the creme-de-la-creme. Best of the best.

I am amazed this guy got command at all.


53 posted on 10/30/2007 3:03:45 AM PDT by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson