Skip to comments.
Did Progress Begin with Roe v. Wade?
Concerned Women for America ^
| 10/26/07
| Janice Shaw Crouse
Posted on 10/26/2007 1:13:44 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
No amount of language twisting calling it "family planning" or "women's reproductive health care" will mask the true horror of abortion. And we need to start showing this horror for exactly what it is!
1
posted on
10/26/2007 1:13:46 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser
2
posted on
10/26/2007 1:14:21 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; ..
3
posted on
10/26/2007 1:14:46 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Maybe poor women should practice abstinence. I’m a single not-hideous 22 year old male and I practice it just fine.
4
posted on
10/26/2007 1:16:29 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(A cosmic castaway)
To: wagglebee
No progress, but the abortion ovens replaced those used by the Nazis in WWII. Of course, the procedures have been cleansed to some extent but the desired outcome of extermination is still the same.
To: wagglebee
“banning abortion “would have a devastating impact on poor women.”
And abortion has a devastating impact on poor babies.
To: wagglebee
One abortion == one dead + one wounded.
7
posted on
10/26/2007 1:20:11 PM PDT
by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
To: wagglebee
I wager this shriveled up old witch (Ginsburp) has never suffered the advances of even the vilest looking of men.
To: wastedyears
Maybe poor women should practice abstinence. Why would they when the federal government has incentivized having more bastards?
9
posted on
10/26/2007 1:22:07 PM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: MrB
Maybe they had a shred of morals left.
10
posted on
10/26/2007 1:23:04 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(A cosmic castaway)
To: wagglebee
Yeah, progress towards 50M dead. Pretty words and euphemisms being painted around the American Holocaust.
11
posted on
10/26/2007 1:23:06 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: Neoliberalnot
Of course, the procedures have been cleansed to some extent but the desired outcome of extermination is still the same. Actually the extermination is just as gruesome and at a far greater pace.
Worldwide, there are nearly 100 abortions performed EVERY MINUTE, around the clock, 365 days a year.
Most abortionists prefer to wait until the fetus is formed because it is easier for them to make sure it's all out (they piece them back together). The abortuaries don't want people seeing the corpses, so they burn them in most countries. However, in the United States, they often use common household garbage disposers.
12
posted on
10/26/2007 1:23:21 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Scratch any pro-abortionist deeply enough and you’ll find some variation on the old “must control the mud people” argument.
13
posted on
10/26/2007 1:24:28 PM PDT
by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
To: Neoliberalnot
Her mother obviously did.
To: wastedyears
Nope, government has made sure to get rid of those too.
The left has done everything possible to make sure the consequences of immoral behavior assert no negative pressure on the occurence of that behavior.
In other words, they use government to make the rest of us pay for the consequences, thus giving NO incentive to the individual to behave/choose morally.
15
posted on
10/26/2007 1:25:45 PM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: Neoliberalnot
16
posted on
10/26/2007 1:31:36 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: Mr. Lucky; Neoliberalnot
Ginsburg’s husband Martin is a multimillionaire tax attorney and law professor. And most shockingly, Antonin Scalia is one of her closest personal friends and they often go on family vacations together.
17
posted on
10/26/2007 1:36:21 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Ginsberg is a psychopath - who could have been stopped but was given a pass by our pathetic party leaders (Dole, Lott, Hatch).
18
posted on
10/26/2007 1:43:29 PM PDT
by
mbraynard
(Tagline changed due to admin request)
To: wagglebee
Wow, how can Scalia stand the sight of this monster?
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
“The path which moved us from civilization
to savagery occurred on January 22, 1973”
Fr. John Powell, S.J. ABORTION: THE SILENT HOLOCAUST
http://www.lifecyclebooks.com
Pro-Life PING
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
20
posted on
10/26/2007 7:23:02 PM PDT
by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson