Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Human race will 'split into two different species' ( liberals and conservatives?)
Daily Mail ^ | 16:18pm on 26th October 2007 | NIALL FIRTH

Posted on 10/26/2007 7:32:47 PM PDT by Candor7

The human race will one day split into two separate species, an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures, according to a top scientist.

100,000 years into the future, sexual selection could mean that two distinct breeds of human will have developed.

The alarming prediction comes from evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry from the London School of Economics, who says that the human race will have reached its physical peak by the year 3000.

These humans will be between 6ft and 7ft tall and they will live up to 120 years.

"Physical features will be driven by indicators of health, youth and fertility that men and women have evolved to look for in potential mates," says the report, which suggests that advances in cosmetic surgery and other body modifying techniques will effectively homogenise our appearance.

Men will have symmetrical facial features, deeper voices and bigger penises, according to Curry in a report commissioned for men's satellite TV channel Bravo.

Women will all have glossy hair, smooth hairless skin, large eyes and pert breasts, according to Curry.

Racial differences will be a thing of the past as interbreeding produces a single coffee-coloured skin tone.

The future for our descendants isn't all long life, perfect bodies and chiselled features, however.

While humans will reach their peak in 1000 years' time, 10,000 years later our reliance on technology will have begun to dramatically change our appearance.

Medicine will weaken our immune system and we will begin to appear more child-like.

Dr Curry said: "The report suggests that the future of man will be a story of the good, the bad and the ugly.

Scroll down for more...

H G Wells' Science Fiction novel The Time Machine (which was later adapted into two films - this picture is from the 2002 version) the human race has evolved into two species, the highly intelligent and wealthy Eloi and the frightening, animalistic Morlock (as seen in the 1960 film version of the classic book)

"While science and technology have the potential to create an ideal habitat for humanity over the next millennium, there is the possibility of a monumental genetic hangover over the subsequent millennia due to an over-reliance on technology reducing our natural capacity to resist disease, or our evolved ability to get along with each other.

"After that, things could get ugly, with the possible emergence of genetic 'haves' and 'have-nots'."

Dr Curry's theory may strike a chord with readers who have read H G Wells' classic novel The Time Machine, in particular his descriptions of the Eloi and the Morlock races.

In the 1895 book, the human race has evolved into two distinct species, the highly intelligent and wealthy Eloi and the frightening, animalistic Morlock who are destined to work underground to keep the Eloi happy.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: crazy; evolution; hgwells; interesting; ladun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last
I guess the sheeple dems will become Morlocks. We conservatives are destined to become Eloi. I bet Israel is happy about that! LOL.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

1 posted on 10/26/2007 7:32:49 PM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Don’t bet the rent money on this one.


2 posted on 10/26/2007 7:35:26 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

This is a leftist geek’s peyote vision.


3 posted on 10/26/2007 7:37:41 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

That’s racist!


4 posted on 10/26/2007 7:38:48 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Call me a pro-life zealot with a 1-track mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

You couldn’t argue against the case based on the people I generally see driving around with demokkkrat bumper stickers. None of them look right or anything like that.


5 posted on 10/26/2007 7:39:22 PM PDT by damondonion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

We’ll have to be morlocks until we overfeed on the eloi causing their extinction. Then we’ll take our rightfull place on the surface.


6 posted on 10/26/2007 7:40:12 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I wonder how they can so accurately predict what is going to happen in 100,000 years. If I slip them a $20 I wonder if they’ll help me pick some stocks next week. Should be a cinch for these mental giants. /idiots


7 posted on 10/26/2007 7:40:22 PM PDT by theymakemesick (End welfare and the crops will be picked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

This cannot be true, they just gave the Nobel Prize to a guy that says WE ARE ALL GONNA DIE of global warming.


8 posted on 10/26/2007 7:41:16 PM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast; Candor7
body modifying techniques will effectively homogenise our appearance.

10 Billion Ken & Barbies'.

9 posted on 10/26/2007 7:42:05 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do it, but we're gonna getcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
"After that, things could get ugly, with the possible emergence of genetic 'haves' and 'have-nots'."

I'm thinking of Ann Coulter and Helen Thomas

10 posted on 10/26/2007 7:43:51 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do it, but we're gonna getcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

100,000 years into the future, sexual selection could mean that two distinct breeds of human will have developed.


What do they mean by sexual selection? There will still be sexual reproduction, right?

What will the status of homosexuals be in this brave new world? Will they have marriage rights with partners of either group?????


11 posted on 10/26/2007 7:45:03 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The problem with sexual selection making a conservative-liberal division is that liberals are parasitic. They’re not replacing themselves by reproduction, they increase their number by stealing conservative kids through their takeover of schools.


12 posted on 10/26/2007 7:49:10 PM PDT by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Men will have symmetrical facial features, deeper voices and bigger penises

Sounds like they're talking about me! Hahaha!
13 posted on 10/26/2007 7:49:17 PM PDT by this is my name not yours (Free speech is the escape valve that keeps some people from picking up a rifle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Wouldn’t the genetic “have nots” die out? He does not explain why they would still be around in 100,00 years.
14 posted on 10/26/2007 7:51:06 PM PDT by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Curry's confused. It happened long ago.

The dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures are the angry, resentful, dishonest, parasitic Neanderthals who inhabit the Leftist strongholds--university campuses, newsrooms of the "Mainstream Newsmedia", the coastal Leftist enclaves, e.g.

The attractive, intelligent ruling elite are the rest of us.

15 posted on 10/26/2007 7:52:43 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

“The alarming prediction comes from evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry from the London School of Economics, who says that the human race will have reached its physical peak by the year 3000.”

That sentence shows that a SCIENTIST believes there will be human alive 1000 years from now. See. global warming does not end life on earth.

I knew it was a myth.


16 posted on 10/26/2007 7:54:46 PM PDT by JSteff (Reality= realizing you are not nearly important enough for the government to tap your phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

"Women will all have glossy hair, smooth hairless skin, large eyes and pert breasts, according to Curry."

17 posted on 10/26/2007 7:55:07 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

“an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures” — You don’t think the libs think we are like that already? I bet so.....


18 posted on 10/26/2007 7:56:39 PM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Wish I could find that image of the cretin moonbats crying when Bush won. One of them was a total retard.


19 posted on 10/26/2007 8:01:42 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Take the wheel, Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Years ago, it was proposed that mankind has for thousands of years been diverging, along a very interesting schism.

One branch of the schism is of the violent, aggressive, individualistic and expansionistic. This branch has advanced civilization in conflict, with natural selection determining development, order and success.

The other branch is non-violent, submissive, collectivist to the point of being herd-like, and recessive. This branch has enlarged itself by avoiding conflict, and risk aversion, accepting domination when they cannot otherwise escape. It does not explore or innovate, and is generally parasitic.

The primary weakness of the first group is that genetically, its best stock is often culled in the process of natural selection, leaving behind the less aggressive, and those who have greater percentages of the genetic code of the second group, thus diminishing their qualities.

The primary weakness of the second group is that it not only avoids aggression, it is incapable of resisting aggression. If cornered, it will submit, and if submission is not enough, it will die. Its members are near the point that they feel pain and get physically ill in the mere presence of aggression, and everything associated with it. Including strong emotions, loud noises, other strong sensory input, and things that are characteristic of the aggressives.

Since the two types still interbreed, it is unlikely they will diverge in the near future. And only when they can no longer even tolerate the other type, will they split entirely. This is also delayed by the second group being very reliant on the first group. If left to its own devices, its members might be so incapable that they just die out, out of naked fear of imaginary aggression.


20 posted on 10/26/2007 8:06:07 PM PDT by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Noticeable changes will occur in 518 years from now....C


21 posted on 10/26/2007 8:07:25 PM PDT by colinhester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I did long ago.

Short version:

Homo Erect Cuss -—> Homo Habitual Cuss -—> Homo Meandering Cuss -—> Homo Modern Cuss -—> A & B:

A. -—> Homo Domestic Cuss
&
B. -—> Homo Rotten Cuss


22 posted on 10/26/2007 8:07:50 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a Lib hanging from every telephone pole, He wouldn't have created so much rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: this is my name not yours

the men of the dominant group will have a bigger penis?

well, people say size doesn’t matter.

As long as an organ does what it is designed to do.

why do they even mention it here, I wonder?


23 posted on 10/26/2007 8:09:28 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Wood Allen says there’s a phone booth type thingy.


24 posted on 10/26/2007 8:09:29 PM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
why do they even mention it here, I wonder?

"Men will have symmetrical facial features, deeper voices and bigger penises, according to Curry in a report commissioned for men's satellite TV channel Bravo."

Isn't Bravo the queer channel? That's why they mentioned it.

25 posted on 10/26/2007 8:18:31 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
The first time I got naked with my wife, she pointed down and said "Who do you think you're going to satisfy with that?". I said, "Me!" :)

Seriously, do you get the feeling that the whole article was just a glimpse into this doctor's psyche (how he sees himself, what sort of woman he finds attractive, and how he sees his "subordinates")?
26 posted on 10/26/2007 8:18:58 PM PDT by this is my name not yours (Free speech is the escape valve that keeps some people from picking up a rifle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

And valuing their lives at so little - and having lost all natural instinct to protect themselves - it will be an easy task. They may even welcome extinction, for the evils their ancestors wrought on the world.


27 posted on 10/26/2007 8:24:30 PM PDT by tbw2 (Science fiction with real science - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

I = It. Duh.


28 posted on 10/26/2007 8:38:59 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a Lib hanging from every telephone pole, He wouldn't have created so much rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
...which suggests that advances in cosmetic surgery and other body modifying techniques will effectively homogenise our appearance

So the changes won't be evolutionary at all. They will be the result of surgical cutting and hormones.

29 posted on 10/26/2007 8:39:36 PM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colinhester

....if man is still alive, if woman can survive..


30 posted on 10/26/2007 8:40:40 PM PDT by jblair (Air Force Brat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: OCC
Wouldn’t the genetic “have nots” die out?

Somebody's got to perform the manual labor to keep the androids and other robotics in good working order.

31 posted on 10/26/2007 8:51:40 PM PDT by NautiNurse (McClatchy News report: Half the nation's families earn below the median family income)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER; Coyoteman; Anti-Bubba182; 668 - Neighbor of the Beast; damondonion; cripplecreek; ...
After that, things could get ugly, with the possible emergence of genetic 'haves' and 'have-nots'." I'm thinking of Ann Coulter and Helen Thomas>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Hey, as you say, its already happened!

Jane Mansfield

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Happy Hillareen

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

32 posted on 10/26/2007 9:01:25 PM PDT by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
They may even welcome extinction, for the evils their ancestors wrought on the world.

...but I'll make them apologize before I allow them to end their miserable, useless existences!

33 posted on 10/26/2007 9:09:47 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a Lib hanging from every telephone pole, He wouldn't have created so much rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
an attractive, intelligent ruling elite

and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures


34 posted on 10/26/2007 9:11:21 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Aldous Huxley, call your office.


35 posted on 10/26/2007 9:23:01 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

btt


36 posted on 10/26/2007 9:56:16 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Looking at the illustration it seems to me that the last character on the right looks like the seamstress in “The Incredibles!” (Can’t remember her name)


37 posted on 10/26/2007 10:04:55 PM PDT by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

This researcher has overlooked the great genetic leveler - alcohol.


38 posted on 10/26/2007 10:23:40 PM PDT by RoarkMan (no tag line entered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

Ask yourself this...what would a evolutionary professor be doing...sitting in the London School of Economics? Think about this.

Notice the comparison with H G Wells novel?

I think this is a hoax story...with a few dimwitted reporters not thinking about what was said.

Besides....how would the human race multiply....if all the women had “pert breasts” as Oliver implicates? The guys would go and hang out at the bars....playing cards....boozing it up...and the population would decrease over the decades to come.


39 posted on 10/26/2007 10:42:01 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
So, are you telling me that the Hollywood and political elite is this attractive, intelligent ruling class?

Whatever drugs this twit is on, this dimwitted, ugly goblin-like creature would like to score some!

40 posted on 10/26/2007 10:49:03 PM PDT by Herakles (Diversity is code word for anti-white racism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"We’ll have to be morlocks until we overfeed on the eloi causing their extinction. Then we’ll take our rightfull place on the surface."

I was thinking that we are getting so fat, that we'll soon have to crawl back into the sea. It's getting to hard to walk carrying around all this blubber.

In fact i saw someone "evolving" right before my eyes on the news a month or so back.

They had to float him down a river to transport him to a hospital.
That got me to thinking about what evolutionists claim, that man crawled OUT of the sea. They have it all wrong, we are going to crawl INTO it. Whales were/ are actually the previous master race. It all makes sense now....

41 posted on 10/26/2007 11:14:32 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Candor7; BenLurkin

That’s the ticket.....you nailed it.


42 posted on 10/27/2007 5:16:27 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do it, but we're gonna getcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

“Don’t bet the rent money on this one.”

Well, I don’t know, may be something to it. Being that I am 6’4” tall, darned handsome, and real smart to boot, I sorta see myself as the prototype of the handsome/intelligent set to come in the future, heh, heh....


43 posted on 10/27/2007 5:27:40 AM PDT by snoringbear (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I know, I know, the intelligent, attractive ones will be called the “Cloud Minders” and the ugly, stupid ones will live in caves and be called “Troglodytes”


44 posted on 10/27/2007 6:37:25 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

10,000 years! But I thought that we were all gonna be dead from global warming by then.


45 posted on 10/27/2007 7:23:57 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures,

Preparing the world for the spread of Islam.

46 posted on 10/27/2007 7:26:32 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
The media elites say just the opposite.

Those of us at FR and other like-minded conservatives are the knuckle dragging cro-magnon, NASCAR loving, homophobic, sexist, racist, etc etc types.

I’m sure the drive by media will run with this story and ponder whether this has already happened. Katie Couric will agree that it has, from her vantage point on the superior branch of the human race.

47 posted on 10/27/2007 8:27:46 AM PDT by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tips up

I’m sure the Neanderthals on the editorial boards of the “Mainstream” news outlets are not aware that they’re Neanderthals. This, of course, does not alter the facts.


48 posted on 10/27/2007 8:37:36 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

You’d have to completely seal off the breeding pools for this to happen and that’s not likely to happen. One thing markets do well is bring a wide variety of people together.


49 posted on 10/27/2007 11:51:25 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

where are ya....when I saw this on Drudge...i figured you’d be all over it hoss

btw....does anyone think modern humans may have evolved from more than one type of coexisting hominid?


50 posted on 10/27/2007 5:25:15 PM PDT by wardaddy (Behind the lines in Vichy Nashville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson