Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Baring Breasts In Public Not Free Speech
10/30/07

Posted on 10/31/2007 4:32:02 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3

http://www.northcountrygazette.org/news/2007/10/30/baring_breasts/

Sorry, rule is link only.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: breasts; court; freespeech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: GOPmember

41 posted on 10/31/2007 6:42:19 AM PDT by F-117A (Mr. Bush, have someone read UN Resolution 1244 to you!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

Bare breasts get New York woman $29,000 -
UPI.com
June 18, 2007
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu9T6hShHB_kA_x9XNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTFhc2pudDdqBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMgRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkA01BUDAwMl83NARsA1dTMQ—/SIG=13e02rr30/EXP=1193924474/**http%3a//www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Quirks/2007/06/18/bare_breasts_get_new_york_woman_29000/9929/

... settlement also marked the second time the change in state law has cost the city. ...


42 posted on 10/31/2007 6:44:01 AM PDT by flowerplough (La Tolteca in Rehoboth, Delaware: They probably cater Fiesta Night in Heaven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
From that link:

“A New York appeals court ruled in 1992 that women should be legally allowed to bare their chests just as men are.”

That reminds me of an incident that happened on our jogging trail at the facility I work at before 9/11. Our camp used to be open 24/7 to local civilians who wanted to use the trail. The women liked the added security of running on a lit trail any time of the day and have the camp security guards as visible deterrents to any possible assaults.

One weekend, a woman decide to jog on the trail topless. One of the guards saw her and politely told her to replace her top. The woman said, “If men can run topless, so can I”. So the guard called HER supervisor on the radio. By the time he got there, the woman had already put her top back on. He later quipped, “The one day we have a topless female jogger, and Kathy was the only one to see her topless”.

43 posted on 10/31/2007 7:14:36 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (I've been too busy for FR this weekend, because I did the things I refuse to let the invaders do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Good, now use the same ruling to ban low-riding pants.


44 posted on 10/31/2007 7:15:17 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
I’m sorry, but I don’t get how going topless is a free speech issue.

Remember the Supreme Court case a few years ago involving a nudie bar in Indiana? Majority opinion said something along the line of "50,000 nude folks in the Hoosier Dome may be sending a message but it's not protected by the US Constitution."

45 posted on 10/31/2007 7:27:46 AM PDT by Martin Tell ("It is the right, good old way you are in: keep in it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Emrys

You posted, in part: Certainly women who go topless are attempting to convey a message. Trying to figure out what that message is can be problematic.
***

That is where I don’t get it. Speech means communication, doesn’t it? If the message can’t be discerned, how is that speech? This is the same problem I have with flag burning as speech. What does burning the American flag mean? “I hate America?... I hate the current administration?... I hate Congress?... I hate the American way of life?... etc., etc.” If the expression is devoid of any real meaning discernable to the average “listener” how is that speech in any real way?

As for seeing women topless, I find it hard (no pun intended) to object, as long is the woman is not my wife or daughter. If the woman is unattractive one can look away. As the comedian Ron White says: Once you seen one woman’s [breasts] you pretty much want to see them all.


46 posted on 10/31/2007 7:29:35 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer

Thanks for that... you are the first, although early.


47 posted on 10/31/2007 7:41:01 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441

I wasn’t sure if you meant this coming Saturday or last Saturday. And early is better than not at all! :)


48 posted on 10/31/2007 7:45:56 AM PDT by Shimmer (happy birthday to youuuuuuuu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441

...as long is the woman is not one’s wife or daughter, or Ann Coulter.

In a recent FR thread about Ann showing another side of herself, I mentioned that I’d like to see her backside. Admin/mod/Sunday-school-teacher seems to have deleted my words.


49 posted on 10/31/2007 7:48:49 AM PDT by flowerplough (La Tolteca in Rehoboth, Delaware: They probably cater Fiesta Night in Heaven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: F-117A
So, my post of the Massachusetts Manatee gets deleted by the mods, but yours is allowed? I clearly detect a conspiracy here.

Now, where did I leave that aluminum foil hat?
50 posted on 10/31/2007 7:57:17 AM PDT by GOPmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Free the tata’s!


51 posted on 10/31/2007 8:03:37 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F-117A

52 posted on 10/31/2007 8:05:31 AM PDT by GOPmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: TornadoAlley3

Unfortunately, 99.99% of the women who do and would go topless in public you don’t want to see with their tops on, let alone off!


54 posted on 10/31/2007 9:14:19 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson