Skip to comments.Democrats Get Off Hillary's Back She's All Ours
Posted on 11/01/2007 5:09:24 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
Listen Barack Obama, John Edwards and all you other soon-to-be also-rans, lay off Hillary. She's well on her way to winning the nomination and we don't want anything to stand in her way...
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
we want hillary to be nominated? ummm not a good idea
Don’t worry. The Beast will be nominated. Even if the bodies of Obama and Edwards have to end up somewhere in a ditch. The Beast will be nominated. You can bet the farm on it.
Democrats are going down like the Titanic and Hillary is the Iceberg that can’t be avoided.
How big a threat is she to pull the majority of the female vote - whether Democrat or Republican? My wife is convinced that a huge number of women will vote for her just because she is a woman. No, my wife won’t be one of those. After listening to a female caller yesterday on Rush I’m beginning to think she may be right. I still don’t think she can win but it could make it a close race.
More Arkansas Dirt Baths?
They will coronate the beast no matter what she does. She is untouchable. Will never be prosecuted. She could eat a screaming baby live on television and the MSM will still support her.
Arkansas Dirt BathsThey'll be plotted from the basement of the WH in a Beast Administration.
I understand what Michael is saying, but the words "Republican attack machine" are a pejorative term that have the effect of waving a red cape in front of Democrat "bulls"!! With the hypersensitivity of the MSM to ANY effort to hold Queen Hilly accountable for her actions and words, a Republican making reference to the "Republican attack machine" is merely the door opener on another round of much ado about nothing.
But, it would serve to distract the public from the disasterous Democrat-led Congress with the lowest approval ratings in history . . . . . . and they are continuing to slide!!!
If she gets te nomination, she will become President. Not that she will win the election, but she will not let that go without a very serious fight and who knows what kind of legal hijinx she will use to get her way. In other words, it doesn’t matter what the voters want, she will use whatever means she can to get her way. She believes she deserves the Presidency and that, above all else, makes her the worst candidate for the job.
I want Hillary to be taken down. And if John Edwards or Barack Obama can take her down in the primaries, then more power to them. I don’t care if they are harder to beat in the general election. The sooner Hillary’s presidential hopes can be dashed, the better.
Defeat Hillary As Soon As Possible.
I think Hillery would also qualify as the first Lesbian elected president.
I wish she would just divorce Bill and come out of the closet.
Hillary, please, come out of the shadows! Stop living the lie, set yourself free!
Dems will talk a good game about the black and the lady and the Hispanic, but based on their history, it'll be WGFTS.
Cattle futures, too.
Who is not as well known, and who hasn't her long trail of baggage, and who can therefore appear to be what the voter wants him to be, like a clean white projection screen. Someone who could run on the message, "What's not to like?" Someone the squishy middle could vote for, for their squishy reasons that decide great matters.
Yes, I fear this result. Provided our candidate is not too much of a gentleman to attack Hillary, she is our best chance of winning in '08. People all know her and, doggone it, they just don't like her! :)
People have been saying that for years.
I'm not sure that would hurt her - she just might become "the Magic Lesbo". Enough people might want to prove their "open-mindedness" by claiming it doesn't matter.
But she said she’s not a lesbian. She said it herself.
‘Course, she also said she wasn’t running for President and promised to serve out her full Senate term, so . . . .
GO Candidates GO! The rest of the Democrats in the debate look like founding fathers caliber men next to Hillary Criminal (and I usually dont have a positive thing to say about ANY Democrat except Zell Miller).
For every dingbat “moderate” woman who votes for her there’s a Reagan Democrat male who won’t.
The road to becoming King Hil-Rod:
1. Coble together various factions and self-interested groups. Minority vote, gay sympathy vote, union vote, "poor" vote, free-health vote, anti-military vote, women's vote, welfare vote, etc.
2. Voter fraud setup where needed by carefully placed democrat operatives/Slick appointees.
3. Preset "contested results" infrastructure. Minorities will claim to be unallowed to vote, lawyers and judges will be ready to count/recount/sue/cry and blame the VRWC.
4. Sympathetic dems to find ways to discard military votes and votes from conservative districts.
Yeah, it's in the bag for Hil-Rod from NY.
The topic is about Hillary. Any thoughts about her?
I think a lot of want to see Obama and Edwards beat her, but her campaign is already out there telling the world they are afraid of a STRONG WOMAN, her. After a few more days and months like this they will come out with the VICTIM thingy.
We'll see. I'm going to track search results for the two terms "hillary" and "huma". I kind of want to start a thread for this purpose but am not sure whether it's within the rules here. Anyway, at present (11/01/07, 6:55 AM PDT), we have:
Google 32.4K hits
Yahoo 132K hits
Dogpile 48 hits
AltaVista 135K hits
So a "whopping" 2% more hold an unfavorable view? For years now this country has been split 50/50. Seems like it would move one way or the other. This partisan crap is getting old. When will people open their eyes and move to the right?
Frankly, if we drop a butt-kicking on the Dem next November, I’ll be happy no matter who it is, because I think they all need it, both personally and for the best interest of the country. I’ll just be that extra bit happier and more relieved if it’s Hillary.
This little slip-up is no reason to get complacent.
Great picture ping!
"Three can keep a secret, If two are
dead. Arkancided"....Ben Franklin.
Right. Not complacent. Good.
Have no fear, the game has already been rigged, the Unions and thier cash are already on board...
Nevada and Michigan were moved forward so Hillary WOULD NOT have to run left to win in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Even if she LOSES both states, the Democrat/Union machine is going to hand her The MUCH larger votes of Michigan and Nevada.
Her willing sycophants in the Media, like Chris Matthews will tell us all a-twitter how she has CLEARLY won, and it’s all over but the Convention.
A LOT of time and money has been spent setting up this prcess to ASSSUE that she wins the nomination, because win or lose, a Ton of Democrat Establishment Wonks are going to get FILTHY RICH from the skim from this campaign, and THE GREAT PAYDAY will not be denied tham, this time...
This was written about 2-3 years ago, and it is coming to pass EXACTLY as foretold...
“we want hillary to be nominated? ummm not a good idea”
Considering that she’s the weakest of the democratic candidates, with the worst likeability rating imaginable - yes. She’s the perfect candidate for our guy to face against. Even the polls that show her winning the nomination comfortably show her losing the general by a 6 point margin. Both Obama and Edwards (who want to replace the WOT with a giant hug session) stand much better chances against the Republican nominee than she does. We cannot afford to let a pansy into office. We need the Dems to run a nominee the Republican nominee will be able to beat.
That said, we also need to nominate a Republican that isn’t just as liberal as they are.
um, like skerry? white guy from the NORTH?
Just how will the Repubs get any info about Hillary to the public with the entire MSM running interference for her?
There are conservative women I know (mostly Independents) who have registered Democrat--so they can eliminate her in the primaries.
And you'll recall, Clinton talked a good game but never actually considered a black, Hispanic or woman for the VP slot (as Mondale did -- don't remember if Dukakis at least considered them).
The Dems talk a good game and will wear their hearts on their sleeves and wrestle with their consciences, and in the end, though they really care, they'll got with the WGFTS over the black, Hispanic or woman.
So, if someone's putting that rumor out there -- if -- it's probably Hillary.
Very very very bad advice. Take Hillary down now - BEFORE she enables a third party candidate (I’m guessing Ron Paul) to be the ‘Ross Perot’ for the general election. She knows she can’t win without a 3rd party candidate that lets her win on a plurality, and that’s part of the plan. Take her down in the primaries, and she won’t have that option.
I doubt that Hillary is that confident of her eventual nomination to do it. It may be a non-starter with the dems, but it IS a concern for the general election. There are many that question that we are ready for a woman, but are we ready for a lesbian woman? I doubt it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.