Democrats Get Off Hillary's Back She's All Ours

Townhall.com ^ | 11/01/07 | Michael Reagan

[PGalt]

GO Candidates GO! The rest of the Democrats in the debate look like “founding fathers” caliber men next to Hillary Criminal (and I usually don’t have a positive thing to say about ANY Democrat except Zell Miller).

[LadyNavyVet]

For every dingbat “moderate” woman who votes for her there’s a Reagan Democrat male who won’t.

[subterfuge]

she will use whatever means she can to get her way.

The road to becoming King Hil-Rod:

1. Coble together various factions and self-interested groups. Minority vote, gay sympathy vote, union vote, "poor" vote, free-health vote, anti-military vote, women's vote, welfare vote, etc.

2. Voter fraud setup where needed by carefully placed democrat operatives/Slick appointees.

3. Preset "contested results" infrastructure. Minorities will claim to be unallowed to vote, lawyers and judges will be ready to count/recount/sue/cry and blame the VRWC.

4. Sympathetic dems to find ways to discard military votes and votes from conservative districts.

Yeah, it's in the bag for Hil-Rod from NY.

[Berlin_Freeper]

The topic is about Hillary. Any thoughts about her?

[tillacum]

I think a lot of want to see Obama and Edwards beat her, but her campaign is already out there telling the world they are afraid of a STRONG WOMAN, her. After a few more days and months like this they will come out with the VICTIM thingy.

[rogue yam]

I think Hillery would also qualify as the first Lesbian elected president.

We'll see. I'm going to track search results for the two terms "hillary" and "huma". I kind of want to start a thread for this purpose but am not sure whether it's within the rules here. Anyway, at present (11/01/07, 6:55 AM PDT), we have:

Google 32.4K hits
Yahoo 132K hits
Dogpile 48 hits
AltaVista 135K hits

[scan59]

The story goes on to report: "The problem is her political baggage: A whopping 49 percent of the public says they have an unfavorable view of Clinton compared to 47 percent who say they hold her in high regard, according to a Gallup Poll survey Aug. 3-5."

So a "whopping" 2% more hold an unfavorable view? For years now this country has been split 50/50. Seems like it would move one way or the other. This partisan crap is getting old. When will people open their eyes and move to the right?

[RichInOC]

Frankly, if we drop a butt-kicking on the Dem next November, I’ll be happy no matter who it is, because I think they all need it, both personally and for the best interest of the country. I’ll just be that extra bit happier and more relieved if it’s Hillary.

[shekkian]

The topic is about Hillary. Any thoughts about her?

This little slip-up is no reason to get complacent.

[Froufrou]

Great picture ping!

[skinkinthegrass]

...and these; are just "the ones" we know about....

"Three can keep a secret, If two are dead. Arkancided"....Ben Franklin.

[Berlin_Freeper]

Right. Not complacent. Good.

[oneamericanvoice]

Democrats are going down like the Titanic and Hillary is the Iceberg that can’t be avoided. Like your analogy, however I think it is bit flawed in that the Titanic didn't have radar. We do, do the scenario becomes what you do with the iceberg once it appears on radar.

[tcrlaf]

Have no fear, the game has already been rigged, the Unions and thier cash are already on board...

Nevada and Michigan were moved forward so Hillary WOULD NOT have to run left to win in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Even if she LOSES both states, the Democrat/Union machine is going to hand her The MUCH larger votes of Michigan and Nevada.

Her willing sycophants in the Media, like Chris Matthews will tell us all a-twitter how she has CLEARLY won, and it’s all over but the Convention.

A LOT of time and money has been spent setting up this prcess to ASSSUE that she wins the nomination, because win or lose, a Ton of Democrat Establishment Wonks are going to get FILTHY RICH from the skim from this campaign, and THE GREAT PAYDAY will not be denied tham, this time...

This was written about 2-3 years ago, and it is coming to pass EXACTLY as foretold...

[COgamer]

“we want hillary to be nominated? ummm not a good idea”

Considering that she’s the weakest of the democratic candidates, with the worst likeability rating imaginable - yes. She’s the perfect candidate for our guy to face against. Even the polls that show her winning the nomination comfortably show her losing the general by a 6 point margin. Both Obama and Edwards (who want to replace the WOT with a giant hug session) stand much better chances against the Republican nominee than she does. We cannot afford to let a pansy into office. We need the Dems to run a nominee the Republican nominee will be able to beat.

That said, we also need to nominate a Republican that isn’t just as liberal as they are.

[tioga]

um, like skerry? white guy from the NORTH?

[pabianice]

Just how will the Repubs get any info about Hillary to the public with the entire MSM running interference for her?

[pray4liberty]

The sooner Hillary’s presidential hopes can be dashed, the better.

There are conservative women I know (mostly Independents) who have registered Democrat--so they can eliminate her in the primaries.

[Tanniker Smith]

Yeah, white guy from the NORTH and he went down like Dukakis -- to a white guy from Texas. They'll go the Bill Clinton route. And in their eyes, it worked for Gore, too.

And you'll recall, Clinton talked a good game but never actually considered a black, Hispanic or woman for the VP slot (as Mondale did -- don't remember if Dukakis at least considered them).

The Dems talk a good game and will wear their hearts on their sleeves and wrestle with their consciences, and in the end, though they really care, they'll got with the WGFTS over the black, Hispanic or woman.

[tioga]

is this edwards' or obama's handywork? someone DOES NOT like hill....gotta wonder who leaked this! IF this is true........