Posted on 11/03/2007 6:47:55 PM PDT by doug from upland
In news that will not have Hillary Rodham Clinton in a joyous mood, veteran FOX newsman Eric Shawn will have Peter Paul on the phone as a guest at approximately 11:20am on Sunday, Nov. 4.
EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA WEBSITE with link to the trailer of HILLARY! UNCENSORED
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Hillary’s “gotcha” incidents are finally piling up and getting exposure.
She’s going to wish the subject had never changed from illegals’ drivers licenses.
Excellent! At least some RAT media will hqve to respond to it, if only to call it “a vast right wing conspiracy hit piece”, LoL!
“She’s going to wish the subject had never changed from illegals’ drivers licenses.”
Yep, from here on Hillary will be going downhill. She might even have to leave the country and join the other people from the Clinton crime family that had to leave.
And I quote...”Fox News isn’t news, it is the vast right wing conspiracy run amok, and exactly why we NEED the Fairness Doctrine and we need it NOW.”
“What do we want - THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE - When do we want it NOW!!!!”
-Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton
All kidding aside, if it is VAST then maybe, jusssst maybe we who think that way are in the MAJORITY, and if that is the case, then our credo and values should prevail, eh Herself?
But really now, you can’t stop the Queen Charlatan.
As far as that will ever come to becoming reality is in our dreams.
What will happen is she will have someone write another book for her, and the American brain dead will flock to book stores to buy it, and Slick Willie will have more to talk about which will spark another speaking tour for $500,000 an hour. Of course every University in the USA will book him and pay that outrageous fee, which ultimately will be paid for by the taxpayer, for an hour of Bill denying any involvement in the scandal.
Bringing the Peter Paul case onto televised news is a huge step-—one that will trigger overtime in the Clinton War Room. God bless you, Doug, for all you have done and continue to do.
Yes, folks like Johnny Chung, Charlie Trie, John Huang and James Raidy.
google: Clinton National Security Scandal and Coverup
Here is a great poll question I would like the MSM to run.
Is Hillary Clinton more divisive than George W. Bush?
Fantastic
Here is a great poll question I would like the MSM to run.
Is Hillary Clinton more divisive than George W. Bush?
^^^
Hope you’re not holding your breath for that one.
I’ll be on at 4:05am Pacific with Mancow in Chicago on Monday morning.
888-2-MANCOW
Each and every one of us have a voice, too, and each and every one of us can write an editor’s letter.
We stopped the Amnesty bill, so together we can stop Hillary.
Not finished yet - hardly even started yet - but it IS a start!
“Yes, folks like Johnny Chung, Charlie Trie, John Huang and James Raidy.”
Yep, they all had to leave, and you are better at remembering their names than I am. :)
USE THIS TO CONTACT THE MEDIA - http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/media
Start with a phone call and follow up with a fax or email.
“Here is a great poll question I would like the MSM to run.
Is Hillary Clinton more divisive than George W. Bush?”
That would be the perfect question. Betcha Laura Ingraham would use it in one of her polls.
“USE THIS TO CONTACT THE MEDIA - http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/media
Start with a phone call and follow up with a fax or email.”
Thank you. That’s a great resource.
Thanks Doug. Thanks Peter.
One would think that with Slick as ex-Pres raking in all those $$ millions that he and Hellary would pay back the 1.5 million or so they owe to Peter Paul to make him go away...
Well I will be in church during that time slot...so hopefully somebody on this thread posts a synopsis of what Ron Paul says.
Freegards,
Lex
This lawsuit includes additional damages beyond the $1.6 mil. Their agent destroyed his company. He lost $30 million in stock value.
bump for Sunday follow-up
Ummmm......Peter Paul. This is not the guy who blames America.
Right Doug...i had a 60 year old senior moment...I know who Peter Paul is...the mounds chocolate guy...LOL. He’s the guy who held the Hillary fundraiser...and I would still like a report of what he tells FOX.
We all have those moments. Since I don’t have cable, someone else will have to report.
“All kidding aside, if it is VAST then maybe, jusssst maybe we who think that way are in the MAJORITY, and if that is the case, then our credo and values should prevail, eh Herself?
But really now, you can’t stop the Queen Charlatan.”
Hillary can complain about “VAST” but her argument is only half VAST!
Hopefully Peter Paul will live to tell it.......just in retrospect, all the “friends” that have met their untimely demise.
I would love to see that question discussed. The same people who complain that Bush campaigned as a uniter, not a divider, are the same people who want to foist Hillary Clinton on us.
I wish somebody would call her on that “vast right wing conspiracy” quote. She originally said that the Monica Lewinsky scandal was engineered by that conspiracy. But the Lewinsky episode turned out to be true!! It was not a pack of lies thought up by any conspiracy.
Hey, genius, Peter was already rich. Before they destroyed his company, his stock was worth $30 million.
You really haven’t followed this at all, have you?
Your real name isn’t Judge A. Howard Matz, is it? If you don’t understand the reference, get busy doing research. Then, it will be worth having a discussion with you.
That is completely innappropriate.
We are seeking the truth. We want the truth. The truth SHOULD be exposed. I commend Doug for taking the time, and using his talent to expose the truth.
Judging from the date you joined FR, I would presume that you were/are seeking truth too. Heaven forbid a "conman" reveals the truth. Truthseekers should unite and not personally attack each other. Some of the best cases in the court of law have been won by criminals speaking the truth. ((SIGH))
Here, go look at his history. http://picasaweb.google.com/scuzzler/PeterPaul19781998
This “conman” pulled the greatest sting ever on Fidel Castro and should have been given a medal of freedom.
For those who have actually paid attention to the story, trying to work with a former president was an attempt to help the company and the shareholders. He wasn’t “for Clinton.” It was a business decision for the company. Many large companies give money to both sides.
Yes, facts are facts. Learn some in this case.
Your attempt to gain fame from all of this is obvious. Good for you, but don’t turn this into something it ain’t.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Actually, my attempt here is to stop Hillary. It has been to the economic detriment of my business for the last 2 1/2 years.
Wow, you pulled some info. Had you actually really been paying attention here, you would have realized that the company had stolen 9 execs from Disney. Stan was honored as a “Master Creator” in China, the first Westerner to be so honored. It gave the company business advantages possessed by no other entertainment company in the world. Japanese anime genius Tendo Oto had infused $5 mil into the company for the Japanese joint venture and promised another 5-7 mil in November. When Clinton’s agent, Jim Levin interfered on behalf of Clinton and formed their own partnership with Oto, the company ran out of cash and failed. Do you know how much money would have immediately come into the company at the announcement of a former president being a rainmaker? No, I suppose you don’t. You know nothing about the case. You just shot off your mouth, got caught without knowledge, and pulled a little tidbit from the Internet.
Paul is, in my opinion, a long-time proven conman
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
At the time of the Cuban Coffee Caper, Cuba was the only country in the world burdened by the TRADING WITH THE ENEMY act. Operatives asked for Peter’s help to expose to the Soviets that Castro was cheating them by selling them cheap black market coffee and pocketing the difference. Exposing what Castro was doing had the real possibility of doing serious damage to their relationship. I wish you were that kind of con man. That would be good for America. But then, you already knew this information, right?
Wonderful. You get credit for being an expert in Dotcom bubble bursts. From your first post, you showed that you know nothing about this case. You continue to prove that. You knew nothing of Peter’s relationship with Ronald Reagan and the Hollywood conservatives. Or his relationship with Judge Bork and Chief Justice Burger. Or his work in California on the 200th anniversary of the Constitution. Or his American Spirit Foundation.
You called him a long time proven con man. He conned Castro, the operation was blown, and he bit the bullet so that other anti-Castro operations were not compromised. He exposed Bert Lance and really pissed off Carter.
Stock price and dotcom bubbles had nothing to do with your first foolish comment. You know nothing about the case and are in way over your head here. I’m not going to debate stock price with you. That’s irrelevant. I’m calling you out on your initial comments, which weren’t appreciated.
Oh the consequences of politicians getting into dirty water by using everyone (including coat-tails) for gain.
Now it is bribery, huh? You are trying to get out of admitting that you haven’t followed the case. Just be man enough to admit it, go do research, and come back when you are up to speed. Using a dictionary definition here is not really very impressive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.