Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report Gives Hope To Fla. Man's Cancer Killing Machine
WPBF-TV ^ | November 2, 2007

Posted on 11/04/2007 7:58:19 AM PST by Zakeet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Zakeet

I may be a bit cynical.....alright, I’m a LOT cynical...but I would think if there is promise to this system, the American Cancer Society would be hesitant to let it ruin the lucrative little setup they have going.


21 posted on 11/04/2007 8:24:30 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (iTunes - The software that helps you bleed your bank account dry in 99 cent increments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Why do the nanoparticles attach preferentially to the tumors vs. healthy cells?

It doesn't say in the article, but they may be tagged with antibodies that recognize proteins only found in the tumor cells.

22 posted on 11/04/2007 8:25:48 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: billorites

There is no carburetor Kemosabe, none at all, that will allow an internal combustion engine to run on water.. No such thing whatsoever.. 100mpg carburetor, OTOH, is a viable working concept.... Just gotta change the fuel atomization rate by preheating the gasoline and adjusting the jets..


23 posted on 11/04/2007 8:28:16 AM PST by Schwaeky (The Republic--Shall be reorganized into the first American EMPIRE, for a safe and secure Society!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: chicagolady
Yeah, but if this guy follows the "post-it note" model...he'll get his machine duplicated and in use by those of influence that will tell their stories.

Then, a "buzz" will be created, and reported on.

Then, he can sell it to those in a financial position to buy.

Then, the Dems will cry, "It should be available for EVERYone...not just the wealthy," and THEN, you just pulled an end-around on the Dems and we got our wish!

The post-it note invention was poo poo'd by those in charge, so the inventor provided some to the secretaries in the office...they loved them, and started requisitioning them. This created enough buzz for management to start asking questions, and my father was part of the original sales team for the test market. He told VIPs to sell the farm and invest in post-it notes, because they were soooooooo well received in the market place that 3M would soar in revenues. The 'ol end-around worked...the only bad thing is, I believe the man only received $1 for his invention...the going price for an invention invented while working at a company. Bummer, huh?

24 posted on 11/04/2007 8:31:27 AM PST by NordP (Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: noname07718
I’m still standing.

Good for you. Be strong...keep fighting.

Stick and move, keep your left up and bring the right hand thunder if dat bum comes at ya again.


25 posted on 11/04/2007 8:32:01 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (iTunes - The software that helps you bleed your bank account dry in 99 cent increments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
it doesn't matter when it was invented/discovered to be incredibly effective - do you really think the AMA is going to let anything so effective and so much less expensive to dry up the lucrative field of cancer?

It wont happen until another illness is prevalent and it's treatment as expensive, comes along...

They remember what happened to all those careers, hospitals, etc, when TB and polio were licked....

26 posted on 11/04/2007 8:33:00 AM PST by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

See my post 24. It’s a shame to have to shame people in charge to do the right thing, but the Dems run the “feelings” in this country and if we can shame them into doing the right thing...they can bring the FDA and AMA along with them...I think it’s possible. The public outcry would make them do the right thing. Okay, I’m an optimist, but we’ve got to to TRY!


27 posted on 11/04/2007 8:38:12 AM PST by NordP (Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: noname07718

You sound like you have the right stuff to KEEP standing - and that is the most effective ‘treatment’ -


28 posted on 11/04/2007 8:39:02 AM PST by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

BINGO


29 posted on 11/04/2007 8:39:49 AM PST by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Really, really smart nanoparticles, I guess.


30 posted on 11/04/2007 8:41:00 AM PST by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Maybe he’ll take it to a foreign country and actually win.


31 posted on 11/04/2007 8:44:23 AM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MainFrame65

This guy must have found certain properties that only cancer cells have—that don’t change, even when they mutate, and then found the element(s) that are attracted to those properties. Then, the radio waves cause those molecules to move back and forth quickly (which I believe is the same action that causes heat or cold) and you have his success.


32 posted on 11/04/2007 8:47:16 AM PST by NordP (Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson

me TOO...

‘kills cancer cells using non-invasive radio waves’

here’s a tip :

If mr Kanzius wants an extra powerful RADIO WAVE KILLER he should try radio waves from AIR AMERICA..heck they’d kill anything....! shoot they are even killin themselves ..most of their outlets have dried up lets hope for the same w/cancer cells.....


33 posted on 11/04/2007 8:50:02 AM PST by flat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: flat

LOL - so true!


34 posted on 11/04/2007 8:54:02 AM PST by NordP (Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

wow ping


35 posted on 11/04/2007 8:56:22 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

M.D. Anderson is one of the best cancer hospitals in the world.


36 posted on 11/04/2007 9:00:37 AM PST by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Why would they do that, and how would they know?

I think there is a temperature difference between normal cells and cancer cells. Perhaps the nanoparticles are attracted to the elevated temp.

37 posted on 11/04/2007 9:02:20 AM PST by dearolddad (Opinions are like rectums: everybody has one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
"This technique was inveted by Dr. John Holt of Australia over thirty years ago. Either this guy doesn't know about the prior art, or he does know and is ripping off Dr. Holt's work"

Actually, if you read both, they do not appear to be even remotely similar.

They did both get the same result, which is wide skepticism. Rightly so, IMHO.

38 posted on 11/04/2007 9:05:24 AM PST by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Why do the nanoparticles attach preferentially to the tumors vs. healthy cells?

Here's one way it might work. You make arrays of millions of different antibodies on silicon and put the chip in a solution of cultured cancer cells. Do the same with cultured non-cancer cells. Coat the nanoparticles with the antibodies the cancers cells stuck to preferentially compared to the non-cancer cells.

39 posted on 11/04/2007 9:16:07 AM PST by edsheppa (WI.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; All

Originated in the 1930’s http://www.rife-machine.com


40 posted on 11/04/2007 9:17:24 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson