Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report Gives Hope To Fla. Man's Cancer Killing Machine
WPBF-TV ^ | November 2, 2007

Posted on 11/04/2007 7:58:19 AM PST by Zakeet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: Zakeet

bookmark


41 posted on 11/04/2007 9:18:34 AM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noname07718

google ‘poly mva’ and/or dr. jeff mueller in altamonte springs, fl.

poly mva apparently “rights” the ions and cures cancer (or stops it). read up on it. he’s never lost a patient.


42 posted on 11/04/2007 9:19:08 AM PST by spacejunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
This technique was inveted by Dr. John Holt of Australia over thirty years ago.

Who cares? Any new light on defeating the menace of cancer is a good thing.

43 posted on 11/04/2007 9:48:53 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NordP

==> “This guy must have found certain properties that only cancer cells have....” <==

Not mentioned in anything I have seen. And what WAS mentioned was both gold and carbon particles, which have vastly different properties. Besides, what you describe is the holy grail of almost all of the current cancer research. The capability to find unique cancer cell characteristics that can be targeted by antibodies is being pursued all over the world, by all of the major drug companies and many other organizations.

Until the mechanism that purportedly causes these particles to preferentially attach to cancer cells is understood and controllable, this is snake oil.

My wife is just two years past breast cancer surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatments, and is now suffering side effects from the prophylactic (maintenance) drugs that she will take for the next 8 years. I would love to see a cure, but I do not want to raise false hopes.


44 posted on 11/04/2007 9:49:52 AM PST by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MainFrame65

It seems possible. When I had Hodgkins, they fed me chemicals that went to the cancerous nodes, so they could get better CAT scans of them before and during treatment. This way, instead of taking a CAT scan, you zap the nodes.


45 posted on 11/04/2007 10:21:00 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I’d have to check, but I don’t think nano particles were around 30 years ago for this kind of experiment. They’ve been around a while now, but I think their availability for research is fairly recent.


46 posted on 11/04/2007 10:23:01 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

That chemical - radioactively tagged glucose for a PET scan, for instance - is used by all cells, but consumed at slightly higher rates by more rapidly growing cells - such as tumors.

It is preferentially absorbed by tumors because of its chemical properties as a natural energy source for metabolic functions, and the slightly higher rate of consumption of tumors due to their higher growth rate. However, mucous membranes, hair and nails, and blood cells also absorb at a higher rate.


47 posted on 11/04/2007 10:36:19 AM PST by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Hey skeptics and nay-sayers: this item has also been the topic of a previous thread.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1890090/posts

In addition, Dr. Stephen Curly is a highly credentialed and well known oncologist and physician working on this treatment protocol at M.D. Anderson. His PowerPoint slides indicate that he (Dr. Curley) has also teamed up with Nobel prize winning chemists Robert Hogue and Rick Smalley at Rice University. He also admits the difficulty in targeting the cancer cells but also states that it is very possible. http://www.manp.org/assets/pdf/erieapril2007.pdf

Here are further comments and a bit about his credentials at nano-health alliance.

http://www.nanohealthalliance.org/events-2/events-1/nanoparticles-as-intracellular-targets-to-produce-rf-induced-thermal-destruction-of-cancer-cells/

Perhaps this has the potential to be more than “Snake Oil”. Lets cut this some slack. For all the families ravaged by cancer, let us hope and pray that Dr. Curley and his team of Nobel Prize winning chemists and researchers can turn this basement invention (which was “ripped off” from 30 year-old research /sarcasm off) into something great for mankind.


48 posted on 11/04/2007 11:13:34 AM PST by E-2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
He's a quack:


49 posted on 11/04/2007 11:29:05 AM PST by StACase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noname07718

Best of luck to you..I pray for all cancer victims and give thanks that I have survived for four years after diagnosis.
The PET scan has been described to me in the same way..it marks cells with high growth rate. I get my next one in Dec.
So maybe this invention is not wishfull thinking or bad science..but a real alternative to chemo and radiation.


50 posted on 11/04/2007 11:41:33 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

In pure layman’s terms, this is how I understand a PET scan works. PET stands for Positron Emission Tomography. What happens is they inject you with a radioactive isotope with a very short half-life. The isotope bonds with glucose and goes all over your body in the blood stream.

Cancer cells are hyperactive in the metabolic process the glucose feeds the metabolic process. When the glucose, with the isotope riding on the molecule is metabolized, two positrons with the same electrical charge are released. With the laws of physics in force that like charges repel each other, the Positrons fly away from the point of metabolism and are captured by the device sensors and tracked back to their point of origin.

That is my understanding in the technology. The latest improvement is where they combine the CT scan and the PET scan into one procedure. This allows the CT to capture those lesions that can be seen (CT) with those lesions that may be missed. It also allows you to read the difference between dormant lesions and scar tissue from active cancers.

Does this make sense to you?

I am in my 5th year of fighting this little speed bump on life’s road. I have found my struggle to be much harder on my friends and family than it is on me. From the moment of my diagnosis, I have slept like a baby without any fear or apprehension along my path. I am doing all that I can and the rest is up to the Doctors and God. I feel very comfortable with my Doctors and God doing the heavy lifting in this struggle.

Keep the faith!


51 posted on 11/04/2007 12:12:25 PM PST by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: noname07718

Have you heard about the doc in Rome using sodium bicarbonate to cure cancer? It changes the body PH. It may have validity.


52 posted on 11/04/2007 12:19:04 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Originated in the 1930’s http://www.rife-machine.com

Scam! Their "RIFE" machine is ham radio transceiver and page is full of garbage. Yea, fools pay $5000 for $800 transceiver. Con artists.

53 posted on 11/04/2007 1:26:59 PM PST by Leo Carpathian (ffffFReeeePeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Why do the nanoparticles attach preferentially to the tumors vs. healthy cells?

1) Higher blood flow, since the tumors are heavily vascularized, reproducing, and growing. 2) Future plans are to attach cell markers to the nanoparticles which would bind preferentially to the tumor cells.

54 posted on 11/04/2007 5:50:57 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: noname07718

After all that, you should be well nigh indestructible! I’m happy about the progress you’ve made, and good luck!


55 posted on 11/05/2007 7:43:01 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson