Skip to comments.
Where Do You Stand on America's Wealth Spectrum?
Yahoo ^
| 6 November 2007
| Lee Eisenberg
Posted on 11/06/2007 5:49:23 AM PST by shrinkermd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
To: shrinkermd
As you see, there's a massive disparity between the haves and have-nots...... Horsepoop. The most massive disparity is likely age. I have been in every one of those "wealth" brackets at some stage in my life. A lifelong accumulated wealth of $860k does NOT have you rubbing shoulders with those who make $25Mil per movie. Those "wealth" categories are working-class categories.
To: Labyrinthos
We’re above average in both and I still don’t feel rich. I’m not rich.
To: shrinkermd
It’s not how much you make, but what you do with it.
23
posted on
11/06/2007 6:22:10 AM PST
by
petercooper
("Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime." - Nicole Gelinas - 02-10-04)
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
Because everything costs so damn much.
24
posted on
11/06/2007 6:22:20 AM PST
by
RockinRight
(The Council on Illuminated Foreign Masons told me to watch you from my black helicopter.)
To: Graybeard58
"It's you and me brother."My word! Who are the ones making LESS than $40,000?
Me and my spousal unit combined earn quite a bit more than that, but there is no way I feel like we're wealthy.
I can't imagine trying to get by on less than 40k.
25
posted on
11/06/2007 6:22:20 AM PST
by
Designer
To: cripplecreek
Most people around here live in Jackson county Michigan due to the lower cost of living here but work in Washtenaw county where pay is better. We have more-or-less the same dynamic around here. Pay is better in Boston, but the cost of living is astronomical, so people tend to live in the surrounding suburbs and exburbs. And now the cost of living in those places is celestial as well. One has to drive at least an hour from Boston to find anything affordable.
To: shrinkermd
Damn! I am rich! Who knew!
27
posted on
11/06/2007 6:22:37 AM PST
by
cajungirl
(no)
To: Mad Dawg
They say if you have assets over 800 plus thousand you are in the top tier. That may be so but that is a long way fro wealthy in my opinion.
28
posted on
11/06/2007 6:24:18 AM PST
by
cajungirl
(no)
To: bobsatwork
Right. Wealthy people spend 860 thou a year old their hobbies.
29
posted on
11/06/2007 6:25:35 AM PST
by
cajungirl
(no)
To: shrinkermd
Wow. I don’t feel so poor now.
30
posted on
11/06/2007 6:25:45 AM PST
by
SoldierMedic
(Rowan Walter, 23 Feb 2007 Ramadi)
To: wagglebee
I remember thinking when all of this SCHIP nonsense started last month how crazy the left's thinking was. If you are a family of four making $80K a year, you are "rich" enough to afford a tax increase, yet you are too "poor" to afford health insurance for your kids. I have often noted the same things. When raising taxes, there are an awful lot of people that liberals think "can afford it." But when doling out entitlements, there are too many to be paid.
Let's see the democrats tax net worth. Let's see how that goes over. Oh yea, the death tax.
By the way, why don't we ever see the stats officially labeling the "middle class"?
Consequently, these statistics are always way off for income levels. There is a large group of workers in the 17 - 23 age range that have very low wage jobs while in school that are included in the stats as "poor." There is also a lot of 60 - 90 age range that is included. They switch back and forth from "house hold" incomes to individual incomes when it fits the story they are selling.
31
posted on
11/06/2007 6:27:58 AM PST
by
Tenacious 1
(The earth is getting Warmer! It ain't my fault. Let's boycott Mother Nature!)
To: Hemingway's Ghost
"And I'm sure cats who live in Manhattan, LA, and San Fran have it even worse."They have higher wages, but expenses are higher there, so it all works out. They are fundamentally no better off than we here in the heartland who are paid less.
Both my sons make more than I do, (both more education as well), but both also live in some high-priced areas.
32
posted on
11/06/2007 6:27:58 AM PST
by
Designer
To: shrinkermd
If you're a teacher married to a policeman, your combined household income puts you in the top 25 percent of all households in the nation. That's funny. Police and teachers (unions) here in Cali are always whining about how poor and underpaid they are.
33
posted on
11/06/2007 6:29:16 AM PST
by
jrp
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
My wife and I are also well above “average” nationally...but only slightly above locally.
Either way we don’t feel rich, either.
34
posted on
11/06/2007 6:29:38 AM PST
by
RockinRight
(The Council on Illuminated Foreign Masons told me to watch you from my black helicopter.)
To: petercooper
Its not how much you make, but what you do with it.It's not how much you make, it's how you make it much?
35
posted on
11/06/2007 6:32:03 AM PST
by
Mad Dawg
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
To: cajungirl
fro wealthy 'fro wealthy?"
But yeah, "wealthy" is a noise that liberals make when they want to raise taxes. It conveys no specific meaning.
36
posted on
11/06/2007 6:33:40 AM PST
by
Mad Dawg
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
To: traditional1
I was a Union member for only 2 years; back in 1968 and 1969 It's not real popular around here (understatement) but I was a union member for 31 years and I don't try to keep it a secret, nor do I keep secret the fact that I have never voted for a democrat in my life.
.
37
posted on
11/06/2007 6:34:13 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
See there? I bet you feel richer already!
38
posted on
11/06/2007 6:34:54 AM PST
by
Mad Dawg
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
To: Designer
I thought it interesting when Britney Spears and her husband Kevin went to court and had to declare earnings. The press focused on Britney and not her husband...he earned over $500,000 but after deductions his gross pay was around $7,000. I guess Hollywood knows how to avoid paying taxes, makes it easier to support a candidate who is going to raise taxes.
To: Designer
I can't imagine trying to get by on less than 40k. A lot depends on where you live, how many people in your family, is your house paid for etc. Many people get by on a lot less than 40k per year.
40
posted on
11/06/2007 6:37:24 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson