Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Blatant mistake’ barred me from Clinton event (SLICK APOLOGY FOR SECRET MEET W/CHICAGO PHARISEES)
Chicago Sun-times ^ | November 9, 2007 | BY MARY MITCHELL Sun-Times Columnist

Posted on 11/09/2007 10:32:39 AM PST by Chi-townChief

Organizers claim they didn’t intend to come off as secretive

"It won’t happen again."

Given the uproar over a closed-door meeting in which Clinton delegates gathered at the Parkway Ballroom on Wednesday for a pep talk from former President Bill Clinton, I’ll bet it won’t.

Traci Otey Blount, a spokeswoman for the Hillary Clinton campaign, moved swiftly to douse the fire storm caused when media were locked out of a meeting billed as a “People’s Rally.”

A gaggle of cameramen and reporters were forced to stand in chilly temperatures for three hours across the street, while a predominantly black crowd of about 450 Clinton supporters gathered inside.

“It was a misunderstanding on the Clinton campaign’s part,” Blount said Thursday. “We discussed whether it was to be a closed event or an open event. We were talking with everybody. We didn’t finalize if it was closed or open. With all the support that we have in Chicago, it was definitely something we wanted to showcase. We take full responsibility.”

According to Bishop Tavis Grant — head of a group called the 21st Century Alliance of Aggressive Leaders and spokesman for a group of community groups that have come out for Clinton — the campaign didn’t verify the former president’s schedule until last Friday.

“The advance people weren’t on the ground until Monday. And it wasn’t on the media wire until Tuesday,” Grant said. “We didn’t want to come off as a secretive or back-door meeting.”

‘Marching orders’ But that’s exactly what it looked like Wednesday when scores of prominent and lesser-known Chicagoans filed into the historic Parkway Ballroom for a private chat with Bill Clinton.

Worse yet, apparently some of the people a public relations professional cited as being at the closed meeting apparently were invited but did not attend.

“But none of those people were there for the purpose of endorsing Sen. Clinton. The meeting was not designed or organized in that fashion with that intent or objective,” Grant said.

Bill Clinton’s appearance at the South Side venue must have been thrown in at the last minute because there was a fair amount of confusion about what was supposed to be taking place. For instance, some community leaders were under the impression that they were going to an open rally.

“The event was basically for former President Bill Clinton and was for all of Hillary’s delegates and supporters,” said the Rev. James L. Demus, pastor of Park Manor Christian Church, who is no longer on the fence about whom he is supporting.

“Clinton gave us some marching orders and told us here are some things you can say when people ask you why you are supporting Hillary and not some other candidate.

“I would characterize it as getting marching orders from one of the highest leaders in the campaign,” Demus said. “I’m a fan of [Sen. Barack] Obama — like him going on ‘Saturday Night Live’ with a mask on — but when it comes to who I feel is the best qualified from Day One to lead this country, with hands down it is Hillary Clinton.”

Demus said rather than trying to shield black supporters from media scrutiny, the media blackout was an oversight.

“It was just a blatant mistake that was made. That is why an apology has been lifted up,” he said.

‘Hillary is becoming very electable’ The Rev. Leslie Sanders, a delegate for Hillary Clinton, said he worked in Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign and has a long history with the Clintons.

“There’s a tremendous field of candidates running for president,” he said. “All of them would make a better president than the one we have right now.”

But Sanders is putting a lot of stock in Hillary Clinton’s poll numbers. Among this group of leaders, this presidential primary is more about who has the edge among all voters and is not seen as an opportunity for an African American to make history.

“Those of us in Illinois have an emotional attachment to Barack other than looking at the overall picture of who has the best opportunity to bring about a change in the White House,” Sanders said. “From a national perspective, Hillary is becoming very electable.

“She has the right to reach out to all communities, just like Barack has the right to reach out to all communities.”

But Hillary Clinton hasn’t reached out to all communities — at least not in Chicago.

What she has done is reach out to a select group of allies, ministers and community activists in the black community who have jumped on her bandwagon.

mailto:marym@suntimes.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 501c3taxcheats; achillwind; aclumia; censorship; churchandstate; clinton; clinton2008; closeddoorsession; democratparty; electionpresident; elections; hillary; marymitchell; rats; religiousleft; slick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last
No concern about separation of church and state here in Chicago.
1 posted on 11/09/2007 10:32:42 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
This is BS. During both her Senate campaigns and her book tour, Hillary treated the press like crap.

It WILL happen again and the media will take it because they are co-dependent.

2 posted on 11/09/2007 10:35:07 AM PST by Doctor Raoul (Columbia = Ayatollah U.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

“People’s Rally”?

Interesting that she uses the same type of terminology as the ChiComs.


3 posted on 11/09/2007 10:35:17 AM PST by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

I like the comment >>> “Clinton gave us some marching orders and told us here are some things you can say when people ask you why you are supporting Hillary and not some other candidate.”


4 posted on 11/09/2007 10:37:25 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Traci Otey Blount, a spokeswoman for the Hillary Clinton campaign, moved swiftly to douse the fire storm caused when media were locked out of a meeting billed as a “People’s Rally.”

A gaggle of cameramen and reporters were forced to stand in chilly temperatures for three hours across the street, while a predominantly black crowd of about 450 Clinton supporters gathered inside.

“It was a misunderstanding on the Clinton campaign’s part,” Blount said Thursday. “We discussed whether it was to be a closed event or an open event. We were talking with everybody. We didn’t finalize if it was closed or open. With all the support that we have in Chicago, it was definitely something we wanted to showcase. We take full responsibility.”

Think Mr. and Mrs. Susan Sarandon will go public and condemn this "chill wind that is blowing"?

5 posted on 11/09/2007 10:37:37 AM PST by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

They are voting for hillary - why attend a meeting you know the outcome.


6 posted on 11/09/2007 10:41:50 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
I am for the Peoples...I's Working Hard for chilrun and peoples!

I is Queen of the Peoples!


7 posted on 11/09/2007 10:42:02 AM PST by Seeking the truth (Queen Hillary faux postage stamps - 0cents.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
“But none of those people were there for the purpose of endorsing Sen. Clinton. The meeting was not designed or organized in that fashion with that intent or objective,” Grant said.

And

“The event was basically for former President Bill Clinton and was for all of Hillary’s delegates and supporters,” said the Rev. James L. Demus, pastor of Park Manor Christian Church, who is no longer on the fence about whom he is supporting.

“Clinton gave us some marching orders and told us here are some things you can say when people ask you why you are supporting Hillary and not some other candidate.

Gee .. seems to me that they can't seem to get their story straight

8 posted on 11/09/2007 10:42:29 AM PST by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
They are voting for hillary - why attend a meeting you know the outcome.

Apparently to get their marching orders

9 posted on 11/09/2007 10:43:40 AM PST by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Definite BS ... may a tape leak to the media and they be unable to hide it any longer. “Marching orders” indeed.


10 posted on 11/09/2007 10:43:47 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Yes, I caught that. Also the next paragraph is pretty priceless:

“I would characterize it as getting marching orders from one of the highest leaders in the campaign,” Demus said. “I’m a fan of [Sen. Barack] Obama — like him going on ‘Saturday Night Live’ with a mask on — but when it comes to who I feel is the best qualified from Day One to lead this country, with hands down it is Hillary Clinton.”

So, hillary clinton is EVEN BETTER than Barack Obama on Saturday Night Live with a mask on! It's good to know what qualities these guys want in a president.

11 posted on 11/09/2007 10:45:33 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Is the media beginning to see the light?


12 posted on 11/09/2007 10:45:52 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

There never is if the Rats are doing it.


13 posted on 11/09/2007 10:46:50 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

Yes, she is a commie to the very bone marrow isn’t she.

I sure hope folks don’t sucker for that red state (republicans) blue state (democrats) crap next time.

Commie = red

End of discussion.


14 posted on 11/09/2007 10:47:51 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Mrs Crinton have Pay Feava. There she go now. "Ah Hsu Ahhh Hsu Ah Hsu!" Crintons worth every penny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

The Clintons don’t make those kind of mistakes on the campaign trail. If the reporters WANT to believe they froze their rears off via a novice dog catcher election kind of mistake.... they might want to first consider just how many campaign events the Clintons have under their collective belts.

Hillary and Bubba simply did not want national coverage of the pandering statements they were going to put foward to that largely black audience. Much like they now realize that sending Hillary’s Wellesly gender-war message across the nation in the blogoshere and some media was very unhelpful to Hillary.


15 posted on 11/09/2007 10:48:36 AM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Get used to it, Mary honey. In Hill World you are just another tool and you will speak when told to speak. This criticism of Her Highness does not bode well for your future.


16 posted on 11/09/2007 10:50:42 AM PST by TigersEye (Oh, why can't a woman be more like a man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth

My Peeps!


17 posted on 11/09/2007 10:51:13 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

They were using Red for Democrat victories when Bill Clinton was originally elected President. The media changed the colors but some didn’t institute the change and didn’t want to regenerate all of their maps.

The fact that we NOW know victories as “Red” or “Blue” indicates that the color change was a deliberate thing. But Red is always the color of Communist revolutionaries.

They want to pretend to be “true blue” Americans.


18 posted on 11/09/2007 10:51:14 AM PST by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
A gaggle of cameramen and reporters were forced to stand in chilly temperatures for three hours across the street

Forced!

Forced! I tell you, it's slavery!

19 posted on 11/09/2007 10:52:59 AM PST by IncPen (The Liberal's Reward is Self Disgust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne
“People’s Rally”?

Interesting that she uses the same type of terminology as the ChiComs....

And the N. Koreans...

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

20 posted on 11/09/2007 10:53:26 AM PST by -=SoylentSquirrel=-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

This was no mistake. Clintoon’s make mistakes, but not this kind of mistake. It was premeditated and so was the aftermath. In the end, the only ones left out in the cold were the press............


21 posted on 11/09/2007 10:53:47 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

With the Clintons, its always a “misunderstanding”.


22 posted on 11/09/2007 10:54:23 AM PST by Sig Sauer P220
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
“It was a misunderstanding on the Clinton campaign’s part,” Blount said Thursday. “We discussed whether it was to be a closed event or an open event. We were talking with everybody. We didn’t finalize if it was closed or open. With all the support that we have in Chicago, it was definitely something we wanted to showcase. We take full responsibility.”

Since when have the Clintons ever cared about inconveniencing others?

23 posted on 11/09/2007 10:57:47 AM PST by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

I agree. That’s it in a nutshell. And that ‘true blue’ is a figment of their imagination, not yours and mine.


24 posted on 11/09/2007 11:00:22 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Mrs Crinton have Pay Feava. There she go now. "Ah Hsu Ahhh Hsu Ah Hsu!" Crintons worth every penny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
I used this stamp for years on every envelope that left my house!! Nothing seems to have changed.
25 posted on 11/09/2007 11:00:26 AM PST by Kathy in Alaska (~ RIP Brian...heaven's gain...the Coast Guard lost a good one.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
the 21st Century Alliance of Aggressive Leaders
What does that insinuate?

“We didn’t want to come off as a secretive or back-door meeting.”
Translates to: "Who the h*ll told YOU about our secret meeting?"

26 posted on 11/09/2007 11:01:50 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. "What happens if neutrinos have mass?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

She didn’t want to be recorded doing another southern fire-and-brimstone preacher accent.


27 posted on 11/09/2007 11:06:32 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sig Sauer P220
“It was just a blatant mistake that was made. That is why an apology has been lifted up,” he said.

blatant:

–adjective
-brazenly obvious; flagrant: a blatant error in simple addition; a blatant lie.
-tastelessly conspicuous: the blatant colors of the dress.

I don't think he meant to say what he said!

28 posted on 11/09/2007 11:07:59 AM PST by Mygirlsmom (Mrs Clinton! How'd your campain fund get so big????? "Ancient Chinese Secret!!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The Clintons (and the Democratic machine in general)are always trying to do stuff under the radar, such as filling the ballot boxes at election time with votes from dead people, and coersing their voting block (which includes most minority voters)with their lies about Republicans. We KNOW that the Republican Party, and Conservatives especially, have done more to advance minorities in our society than the Democratic Party has EVER done. President Lincoln fought to end slavery, and he was a Republican. Republicans amended the Constitution to grant blacks citizenship and the the right to vote. It was the Republicans who pushed for civil rights legislation from Lincoln’s time up through the 1960’s, against the objections of Democrats.

So when Clinton is preventing the Media from being present at his “one-on-one” with minorities, you wonder just what wool they’re trying to pull over the minorities’ eyes this time. Not that the Media can be depended upon to report honestly or openly on anything their beloved liberal co-consirators are up to.


29 posted on 11/09/2007 11:15:42 AM PST by tcw_laj4ALL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

When is the FEC going to step in and go after the electioneering behind the church pulpits that the DEMs are so fond of doing in the black churches?!


30 posted on 11/09/2007 11:22:49 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcw_laj4ALL

And Hillary screams that the Bush administration is secretive? Come on, this whole thing smells bad and chances are it has to do with voting “irregularities”...Sad thing is, blacks just continue to thwart their own independence when they lay down at the democratic altar of subjection.


31 posted on 11/09/2007 11:24:56 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Traci Otey Blunt, outreach and partnerships manager, National 5 A Day for Better Health Program, discusses the Men's 9 A Day Campaign at the Black History Month 2004 community event.

32 posted on 11/09/2007 11:25:05 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcw_laj4ALL

You’re right. I couldn’t agree more.

Bill showed us what a one party state could turn into. And he also showed us what a one party nation could turn into, with the media’s help.

It’s too bad there are so many mentall ill people out there. I guess someone was bound to exploit them sooner or later.


33 posted on 11/09/2007 11:25:10 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Mrs Crinton have Pay Feava. There she go now. "Ah Hsu Ahhh Hsu Ah Hsu!" Crintons worth every penny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

Also .... by claiming that this event wasn’t to endorse Hellary .. then Hellary campaign funds don’t have to pick up the tab for the expenses


34 posted on 11/09/2007 11:29:31 AM PST by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
This is BS. During both her Senate campaigns and her book tour, Hillary treated the press like crap. It WILL happen again and the media will take it because they are co-dependent.

Exactly!

The Clintons will also have them bused in to vote even when the polls aren't open, ask Jay Dickey in Arkansas!

On the Sunday before Election Day, in GOP Rep. Jay Dickey's Arkansas district, black preachers told their congregations that there would be no sermon that day -- instead they were all going to the polls, which had been specially (and illegally) opened for the purpose of their casting their votes. Is anyone confused about whom the votes might have been for?

35 posted on 11/09/2007 11:31:16 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kathy in Alaska

Hi Kathy....yes, we just can’t get rid of them!

Thank God, Chelsea does not (yet?) appear to have any political aspirations...LOL


36 posted on 11/09/2007 12:15:09 PM PST by Seeking the truth (Queen Hillary faux postage stamps - 0cents.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth

LOL! Thank God indeed!


37 posted on 11/09/2007 12:23:33 PM PST by Kathy in Alaska (~ RIP Brian...heaven's gain...the Coast Guard lost a good one.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

The modern, urban, religio-politico, Rev. James L. Demus:

“I’m a fan of [Sen. Barack] Obama — ... — but when it comes to who I feel is the best qualified from Day One to lead this country, with hands down it is Hillary Clinton.”

(Ask him why he feels Hillary’s best qualified and you’ll get the same kind of doubletalk Hillary spewed about giving illegals licenses, or else you’ll get the brushoff.)


38 posted on 11/09/2007 12:25:08 PM PST by flowerplough (La Tolteca in Rehoboth, Delaware: They probably cater Fiesta Night in Heaven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

But not surprising.

When she says she prefers the term progressive and wants to get back to what the word liberal used to mean at the beginning of the century (as she said in that first youtube debate), she is referring to flat out marxism. Progressive is the term that those early US communists back at the turn of the century when Lenin was king used to call themselves so as to avoid direct identification as communists.

I doubt most liberals know it, but calling themselves progressives isn’t actually a new term, but rather, an old one.


39 posted on 11/09/2007 12:30:21 PM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
"But Hillary Clinton hasn’t reached out to all communities — at least not in Chicago"

One would expect her to at least traipse around the hallowed grounds of her mentor, Saul Alinski. Ol' Saul would be disappointed, and would probably admonish her by saying, 'Hillary, where there are no women, be thou a woman.' (paraphrasing a quote to Alinsky by a rabbi, who admonished Saul at one time to be a man where there were no men.)

40 posted on 11/09/2007 12:49:12 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth

No Sense.


41 posted on 11/09/2007 4:12:51 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth

10 out of every 8 votes in that community will be cast for Hillary!!


42 posted on 11/09/2007 4:15:48 PM PST by tcrlaf (You can lead a Liberal to LOGIC, but you can't make it THINK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
The Clintons will also have them bused...

Handy guide to the Clintons:


43 posted on 11/09/2007 4:20:22 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ironclad
I've tried to find this story at AP, and they have spiked it from the news list! Watch this, the Clintons are now going to try to deny the whole EVENT ever happened.

Why you ask?

According to Bishop Tavis Grant — head of a group called the 21st Century Alliance of Aggressive Leaders and spokesman for a group of community groups that have come out for Clinton.....

“But none of those people were there for the purpose of endorsing Sen. Clinton. The meeting was not designed or organized in that fashion with that intent or objective,” Grant said.

“The event was basically for former President Bill Clinton and was for all of Hillary’s delegates and supporters,” said the Rev. James L. Demus, pastor of Park Manor Christian Church, who is no longer on the fence about whom he is supporting.

“Clinton gave us some marching orders and told us here are some things you can say when people ask you why you are supporting Hillary and not some other candidate.

“I would characterize it as getting marching orders from one of the highest leaders in the campaign,”

The Clintons KNEW they couldn't let the press in to see them give "Marching orders" to Pastors and Bishops who preside over churches that file exempt status on their Fed tax returns. That would be AGAINST THE LAW.

The Clintons PLANNED for the press not to be there. If the media-whore Clintons didn't want them there, it was because what was going on inside was ILLEGAL.

Bump this story to the top, the liberal press is now tryng to spike it over the weekend. The Clintons have been caught red-handed AGAIN in federal crimes.

44 posted on 11/09/2007 5:48:13 PM PST by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne
"Interesting that she uses the same type of terminology as the ChiComs."

The people's candidate, to occupy the peoples Whitehouse, in the soon to be people's republic...

45 posted on 11/09/2007 6:06:29 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Just another example of the Clintons blatantly breaking the law, with the liberal media and Federal prosecutors just winking and saying: "Nothing to see, move along."

If President Bush had met secretly with conservative church leaders, the DBM would be screaming "Seperation of Church and State" at the top of their lungs all year.

46 posted on 11/09/2007 6:27:54 PM PST by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Typical liars and cheats.

“Oops!”

AFTER the fact.

Lying children say, “I was just kidding!”

Clinton’s say, “It was a misunderstanding.”


47 posted on 11/09/2007 6:29:59 PM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Where’s all the white women?


48 posted on 11/09/2007 6:34:40 PM PST by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

Without talk radio and the Internet, she would have an 80% favorable rating.


49 posted on 11/09/2007 6:50:50 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Without talk radio, we wouldn't be allowed to have talk radio!

I sense a groundswell in the nation similar to 1994. The liberal elitists don't see the pitchforks, tar and feathers coming, because they are so out of touch with the "common people." Hillary! is the lightning rod that will conduct every watt of disgust the American people have for the Federal government.

Keep up the great work on the PP case.

50 posted on 11/09/2007 7:01:33 PM PST by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson