Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LSUfan

He’s a lunatic.


2 posted on 11/09/2007 11:28:34 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy

This should finish Don Quixote’s tilt at the windmills. Yeah Ron, They might be Giants.


5 posted on 11/09/2007 11:30:29 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
You really don’t understand what is going one here do you.

The Neo Cons have permeated the conservative movement to the point of criminality.

Ron Paul is the only real conservative candidate who understands the Constitution and how our founding fathers intended for our government to work.

He know the whole Iraq war was just a Wilsonian ploy by the neo cons...

Oh hell I can do it, I am laughing so hard I can’t see through the tears...

9 posted on 11/09/2007 11:33:13 AM PST by ejonesie22 (Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
Be consistent, he’s apparently not only a lunatic, but a traitor.
21 posted on 11/09/2007 11:36:52 AM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
He’s a lunatic.

.....as well the voters he attracts.

90 posted on 11/09/2007 12:11:58 PM PST by OB1kNOb (Support Duncan Hunter for the 2008 GOP presidential nominee. He is THE conservative candidate!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
He’s a lunatic.

Why? Is what the report says true or not?

If it is true, do you approve of killing enemy soldiers who are trying to surrender?

Killing enemy soldiers who are trying to surrender is not only morally wrong, it is dangerous.

Remember Goliad???? We Texans do.

IF this is true, it supports Ron Paul's position that mistakes by the US has created an increased risk for America. Just like Goliad, the Iraqis and other Muslims would be driven to retaliate to avenge these deaths.

So who's the lunatic now? I'd say whoever gave the order to kill enemy soldiers trying to surrender.
139 posted on 11/09/2007 2:30:30 PM PST by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
He’s a lunatic.

Always has been, always will be. I used to be a Senate aide, and we used to look for his insertions into the Congressional record, and read them out loud to get a good belly laugh. It was "listen to what Ron Paul is saying today". He was anti-semitic and anti-military back then, too, when Ronald Reagan could have used his support against the commies. He was also an independent, not a Republican. I was surprised to see a few years back that he was calling himself a Republican, because what I read back then, he was nothing of the sort.

He also had a penchant for inserting articles from the looney tunes papers like the Spotlight and the Larouche publications.

145 posted on 11/09/2007 2:46:16 PM PST by Defiant ("Expectorate" has Specter in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
I saw Ron Paul about 2 weeks ago at Clemson, SC.

One of the things he said at the rally was, at any moment you can be declared an enemy combatant, whisked of to some remote part of the world and tortured by your government.

Is this really happening? I think his special appeal is to the overly paranoid.

246 posted on 11/12/2007 9:27:40 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson