Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul supported the PLO terrorists
The Ron Paul Political Report | Volume 1 Number 1 | Ron Paul

Posted on 11/09/2007 12:34:47 PM PST by LSUfan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: MEGoody
It’s odd that the Paulestinians have forgotten that Congress authorized the use of force in Iraq.

They're still crying because Bush didn't issue Letters of Marque and Reprisal.

Because of that, they've been rooting for the terrorists to win and are quite peeved at the recent developments.

61 posted on 11/09/2007 2:37:23 PM PST by Allegra (Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
We "pro-war" types are busy with the war and with transition activities. We'll have to leave that other stuff to the Ron Paul-worshiping moonbats. We're not worried so much about parades; we're more concerned with the eradication of terror threats to the U.S.

We thank and honor you for your service, ma'am!

62 posted on 11/09/2007 2:41:26 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
It’s odd that the Paulestinians have forgotten that Congress authorized the use of force in Iraq.

And was that a declaration of war?

Why are you guys so hesitant to have the United States to actually declare war and define victory?

That is the authority and responsibility that was given to the Congress by the (gasp!) Constitution.

Maybe some of you 'conservatives' think we don't need that 'archaic' Constitution anymore.

63 posted on 11/09/2007 2:46:16 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
My, you must be very busy people-how do you have time to be in FR?

It's nighttime and the Arabic weekend, so the Iraqi government offices are not open. I'm sure I work harder in an average day here than you do in a week. If you're asking about my down time, my answer is "none of your damn business."

What transition is going on that will end the war with our troops marching home in victory.

I don't owe you any detailed explanations. You can find reports about the transition activities on various sites related to MNFI.

Or is that a secret plan like Kerry had?

You'd know more about Kerry than I would, wouldn't you? Your views are more closely aligned with his than mine will ever be.

Will they be translated into political ones or squandered like they were in Korea and Vietnam?

I don't make those decisions, nor do I have a crystal ball. I am embedded on the military side, not the State Dept. side.

Your snarkiness is just amplifying how bitter you are about the positive developments here.

Just go to your Starbucks job and leave the hard work to those who aren't afraid of it, OK? I detest you smelly anti-war types and I have FReeped you more than once back in '03 at your A.N.S.W.E.R., MoveOn, etc. rallies.

64 posted on 11/09/2007 2:47:08 PM PST by Allegra (Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: Allegra
[My, you must be very busy people-how do you have time to be in FR?]

It's nighttime and the Arabic weekend, so the Iraqi government offices are not open. I'm sure I work harder in an average day here than you do in a week. If you're asking about my down time, my answer is "none of your damn business."

You mean it is the beginning of an Islamic weekend don't you?

[ What transition is going on that will end the war with our troops marching home in victory. ]

I don't owe you any detailed explanations. You can find reports about the transition activities on various sites related to MNFI.

Well, as long as the American people are being kept informed....

[ Or is that a secret plan like Kerry had? ]

You'd know more about Kerry than I would, wouldn't you? Your views are more closely aligned with his than mine will ever be.

No, since you and Kerry are very much alike and are keeping your plans secret.

Must be on a need to know basis and the American people will get the information when the Government is good and ready to give it to them.

[ Will they be translated into political ones or squandered like they were in Korea and Vietnam? ]

I don't make those decisions, nor do I have a crystal ball. I am embedded on the military side, not the State Dept. side.

Gee, and I thought I was talking to the person who had the answers!

Your snarkiness is just amplifying how bitter you are about the positive developments here.

And your arrogance is indicative of the attitude of the elites who think that the American people have no business asking them any questions.

Just go to your Starbucks job and leave the hard work to those who aren't afraid of it, OK? I detest you smelly anti-war types and I have FReeped you more than once back in '03 at your A.N.S.W.E.R., MoveOn, etc. rallies.

Well, since I am an American I have a right to know what is going on or do you think that is too much to ask since it is an American issue?

If anything your post has shown exactly what the problem is, an attitude that thinks it is above any questioning or criticism.

If you are in the government, you work for the American people, we don't work for you.

66 posted on 11/09/2007 3:02:29 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
It is very important to point out that, if Ron Paul had his way in 1991, Saddam would still occupy Kuwait, international inspectors would never have uncovered his chemical, biological and nuclear programs and he would very likely have The Atomic Bomb today.

And he would have used it against Iran, not the USA, and would have saved us loads of trouble.

Instead we attacked the most secular government in the Middle East.

67 posted on 11/09/2007 3:17:56 PM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
I have my differences with Ron Paul on the Iraq war, but this bullshit lying about the good things the man has done is shameful.

What good things? He blames us for 9/11. He feels the terrorists had a good reason for attacking us. He wants to surrender to the terrorists rather than defeating them. He would rather support the PLO than our best friend in the middle east, Israel. And where are there any lies?
68 posted on 11/09/2007 3:38:55 PM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
Ron Paul has the audacity of running on the platform of adhering to the Constitution-the rascal!

Only the parts of the Constitution he wants to adhere to.
69 posted on 11/09/2007 3:41:54 PM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast
[Ron Paul has the audacity of running on the platform of adhering to the Constitution-the rascal! ]

Only the parts of the Constitution he wants to adhere to.

He believes in all of the Constitution.

And your candidate is?

70 posted on 11/09/2007 3:44:49 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
Maybe you aren't worried about parades, but the troops deserve them and that is why when we win a war, they get one.
.

The problem is that the paulie girls do not want to win the war, they want us to surrender. They want to make sure the terrorists see a paper tiger in the U.S. so they are willing to attack us again that way they can blame us for the attacks again. The paulie girls are anti-Israel and anti-America.
71 posted on 11/09/2007 3:52:31 PM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast
[Maybe you aren't worried about parades, but the troops deserve them and that is why when we win a war, they get one. ]

The problem is that the paulie girls do not want to win the war, they want us to surrender. They want to make sure the terrorists see a paper tiger in the U.S. so they are willing to attack us again that way they can blame us for the attacks again. The paulie girls are anti-Israel and anti-America.

More labels.

The terrorists saw a paper tiger in Clinton's foreign policy, yet no one mentions that in the debates-can't criticize foreign policy decisions-that would be unpatriotic!

And the candidate you support is?

72 posted on 11/09/2007 4:02:06 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

Are you posting this because you disagree with it? I agree with it, why are you in favor of the US government censoring free speech? This title is false.


73 posted on 11/09/2007 4:10:29 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

What good would it do to bring up the mistakes of Paul’s mentor, Bill Clinton’s 10 years ago do in the Republican debate?


74 posted on 11/09/2007 4:14:26 PM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast
What good would it do to bring up the mistakes of Paul’s mentor, Bill Clinton’s 10 years ago do in the Republican debate?

Let me see, oh, that's right, another Clinton is running with the same foreign policy agenda-the NWO.

The very thing that Ron Paul opposes.

75 posted on 11/09/2007 4:23:28 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast

I forgot to ask you, and your candidate is?


76 posted on 11/09/2007 4:23:59 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
I will support the Republican who wins the nomination. Which rules out cut and run (He is neither Republican nor will he ever win the nomination). I knew John McCain and I would have a hard time supporting him, but I could over the democratic candidate. But I could NEVER support an anti-American white flag waving terrorist appeasing coward like cut and run.
77 posted on 11/09/2007 4:52:13 PM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Little Green Footballs is now carrying the story, as well. ;)
78 posted on 11/09/2007 5:31:42 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
LGF just links back to this very same thread here on FR.
79 posted on 11/09/2007 6:30:20 PM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
You mean it is the beginning of an Islamic weekend don't you?

I meant exactly what I said.

Well, as long as the American people are being kept informed....

Talk to your media buddies about that. The information is out there for anyone who is interested. If it's good news, the media doesn't want you to know about it. It is not incumbent upon me to separately assemble detailed information for some individual sniveling, anti-war surrender-monkey. My reports follow the chain of authority and are put out for public consumption.

No, since you and Kerry are very much alike and are keeping your plans secret.

See my previous comment. And if you're angling for me to put personal information on a public forum that will compromise my own security or that of those around me, you're more arrogant and self-centered than I thought you were.

Gee, and I thought I was talking to the person who had the answers!

I never claimed to have all of the answers. Those are your words. I have been putting news about OIF out on FR for nearly four years now. If you've missed it, tough toenails. However, I will not violate OPSEC just to satisfy one whining Code Pink member.

Well, since I am an American I have a right to know what is going on or do you think that is too much to ask since it is an American issue?

I told you where to go look. I guess you're too lazy. I guess you expect me to personally serve you. You're delusional. Actually, I have answered many people's questions here on FR if I've known the answer and it hasn't been an OPSEC issue. However, my rules are that you ask politely and you appear incapable of that. Plus, you are not asking specific questions, you are being deliberately vague.

If you are in the government, you work for the American people, we don't work for you.

I am not a government employee. Nice try, though.

You work for the Starbucks manager, correct?

80 posted on 11/10/2007 12:06:05 AM PST by Allegra (Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson