Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/09/2007 12:34:50 PM PST by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: SJackson; Allegra; Alouette; lormand; Petronski; drpix; ejonesie22; mnehrling

Oh-so-very-NOT-surprised-by-this PING. ;)


2 posted on 11/09/2007 12:37:35 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan

Bump
These keep getting worse and worse for Cut and Run don’t they.

When do you plan to scan these?


3 posted on 11/09/2007 12:37:44 PM PST by mnehring (I am free not to support Ron Paul... Wow, I feel special...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan
I'm sure Ron Paul's supporters (like the one in this pic) will be furious to find out that he supported the PLO.


4 posted on 11/09/2007 12:39:02 PM PST by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan

Ron Paul is a crank candidate.


5 posted on 11/09/2007 12:41:03 PM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan
Is this a vanity? I see no link.

How old is your rant and do you have anything to back it up?

7 posted on 11/09/2007 12:43:06 PM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Sucks to be them.


8 posted on 11/09/2007 12:44:22 PM PST by Allegra (Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan

I got a question for you, did you pay for the back issues of this newsletter? Or alternatively, how did you acquire back issues of such a small run ‘zine from the early 90’s?


27 posted on 11/09/2007 1:18:53 PM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan
Wow this place has gotten pretty funny since I last visited. I merely point out that Paul didn't support PLO terrorism as your headline claimed, as it was pretty obvious from the quote that he was making a free speech stand, and my comment got swiftly removed by the moderator. The irony.

I also love the hypocrisy of people who talk about "Islamofascism" out of one side of their mouths and Godwin's Law from the other.

Sadly, Reagan is certainly rolling over in his grave over what has become of conservatism. If you ever actually read his writings and interviews, he calls himself a libertarian and that that is the core of conservativism. The Jonah Goldberg-style now in vogue explicitly distances himself from Reagan. Goldberg can't stop writing about how Reagan was a loser who's irrelevant today:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ODVkYjFhNjFjZDlhYmI3MDY3MmNjYjQ4MGM0MDMxNzY=

You can have Goldberg, and whatever you call his schtick, which sounds Wilsonian to me. I'm gonna stick with Reagan, thank you, as I don't believe conservative principles are relics. Some party will rise again with them even if the Republican party goes the way of the Whigs.
28 posted on 11/09/2007 1:28:04 PM PST by Deathmonger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan
You're a pathetic liar. What you posted never said or implied that Ron Paul supported PLO terrorists. It is obviously a free speech stance, nothing more.

There are legitimate reasons to disagree with Ron Paul, just as any other candidate, but these vile, personal, and false attacks makes it look like you are afraid that he is going to win or make a difference and that you have no substantive grounds on which to attack him.
33 posted on 11/09/2007 1:37:12 PM PST by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan

I saw Ron Paul strangling a litter of kittens out behind the US Capitol.


36 posted on 11/09/2007 1:48:02 PM PST by CholeraJoe (Be unique. It makes it easier for the rest of us to identify the morons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan
Hey, LSUfan, you cut-and-paste and run coward. Come back and post the ENTIRE article that you SAY that you are quoting. I don’t trust you for a New York minute to have posted the truth and in full context.
44 posted on 11/09/2007 2:08:14 PM PST by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan

Oy vey, Ron Paul is a real lunatic.


49 posted on 11/09/2007 2:16:08 PM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan

Wonder if Ron Perot nominated Saddamn for the Nobel??

Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops


50 posted on 11/09/2007 2:18:55 PM PST by bray (Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan; All
Paulistinians! So these are the ones that have been voting for Ron Paul in all the online polls.
65 posted on 11/09/2007 2:49:31 PM PST by AKSurprise ("Massachusetts: 10,555 Sq. Miles surrounded by reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan

Are you posting this because you disagree with it? I agree with it, why are you in favor of the US government censoring free speech? This title is false.


73 posted on 11/09/2007 4:10:29 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan
Little Green Footballs is now carrying the story, as well. ;)
78 posted on 11/09/2007 5:31:42 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan; mnehrling; Monterrosa-24; Allegra; lormand; Petronski; ejonesie22; drpix; svcw; ...
Another shock.

On top of the Willis Carto/American Free Press/Council of Conservative Citizens columns/Stormfront-David Duke support, this doesn’t surprise me at all, and personally I think an explanation of this and his 1992 “expose” of the fleet footed, politically foolish, largely criminal population of blacks living among us. Full newsletter article here

The criminals who terrorize our cities--in riots and on every non-riot day--are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are. As children, they are trained to hate whites, to believe that white oppression is responsible for all black ills, to "fight the power," and to steal and loot as much money from the white enemy as possible.

Regardless of what the media tell us, most white Americans are not going to believe that they are at fault for what blacks have done to cities across America. The professional blacks may have cowed the elites, but good sense survives at the grass roots. Many more are going to have difficultly avoiding the belief that our country is being destroyed by a group of actual and potential terrorists -- and they can be identified by the color of their skin. This conclusion may not be entirely fair, but it is, for many, entirely unavoidable.

Indeed, it is shocking to consider the uniformity of opinion among blacks in this country. Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty, and the end of welfare and affirmative action. I know many who fall into this group personally and they deserve credit--not as representatives of a racial group, but as decent people. They are, however, outnumbered. Of black males in Washington, D.C, between the ages of 18 and 35, 42% are charged with a crime or are serving a sentence, reports the National Center on Institutions and Alternatives. The Center also reports that 70% of all black men in Washington are arrested before they reach the age of 35, and 85% are arrested at some point in their lives. Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the "criminal justice system," I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.

If similar in-depth studies were conducted in other major cities, who doubts that similar results would be produced? We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, but it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings, and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers.

Perhaps the L.A. experience should not be surprising. The riots, burning, looting, and murders are only a continuation of 30 years of racial politics. The looting in L.A. was the welfare state without the voting booth. The elite have sent one message to black America for 30 years: you are entitled to something for nothing. That's what blacks got on the streets of L.A. for three days in April. Only they didn't ask their Congressmen to arrange the transfer.

Blacks have "civil riqhts," preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black beauty contests, black tv shows, black tv anchors, black scholorships and colleges, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda.

Two years ago, in a series of predictions for the 1990s, I said that race riots would erupt in our large cities. I'm now predicting this will be the major problem of the 1990s.

The good news, Paul (or someone) does correct predict the rise of a terror threat in the 1990s. Of course it’s the blacks and their ideology and culture, not the rational Islamists reacting to colonialization.

The Paul excuse is that though the article is signed by Ron Paul, and printed in the $50 per year Ron Paul Political Report, those aren’t his statistics and opinions, he didn’t actually write it, and apparently never read it.

The remedy, an apology, appropriate. A refusal to identify the individual Paul trusted with his name. IMO, unacceptable for a Presidential candidate. This individual was obviously close to Paul, given the years long gap between publication and discovery may reflect Paul’s views, and may well still be close to him. And a refusal to release other copies of the publication so the public can see just what Paul was advocating over those years. And yes, the link above, the only complete article from the newsletter was posted to usenet by a well known white supremacist.

These excerpts clearly address the issue of newsletter content. From a NYT magazine interview, The Antiwar, Anti-Abortion, Anti-Drug-Enforcement- Administration, Anti-Medicare Candidacy of Dr. Ron Paul , earlier this year,

Paul survived these revelations. He later explained that he had not written the passages himself — quite believably, since the style diverges widely from his own. But his response to the accusations was not transparent. When Morris called on him to release the rest of his newsletters, he would not. He remains touchy about it. “Even the fact that you’re asking this question infers, ‘Oh, you’re an anti-Semite,’ ” he told me in June. Actually, it doesn’t. Paul was in Congress when Israel bombed Iraq’s Osirak nuclear plant in 1981 and — unlike the United Nations and the Reagan administration — defended its right to do so. He says Saudi Arabia has an influence on Washington equal to Israel’s. His votes against support for Israel follow quite naturally from his opposition to all foreign aid. There is no sign that they reflect any special animus against the Jewish state.

What is interesting is Paul’s idea that the identity of the person who did write those lines is “of no importance.” Paul never deals in disavowals or renunciations or distancings, as other politicians do. In his office one afternoon in June, I asked about his connections to the John Birch Society. “Oh, my goodness, the John Birch Society!” he said in mock horror. “Is that bad? I have a lot of friends in the John Birch Society. They’re generally well educated, and they understand the Constitution. I don’t know how many positions they would have that I don’t agree with. Because they’re real strict constitutionalists, they don’t like the war, they’re hard-money people. . . . ”

Paul’s ideological easygoingness is like a black hole that attracts the whole universe of individuals and groups who don’t recognize themselves in the politics they see on TV. To hang around with his impressively large crowd of supporters before and after the CNN debate in Manchester, N.H., in June, was to be showered with privately printed newsletters full of exclamation points and capital letters, scribbled-down U.R.L.’s for Web sites about the Free State Project, which aims to turn New Hampshire into a libertarian enclave, and copies of the cult DVD “America: Freedom to Fascism.”

It strikes me that a request to release the newsletters is perfectly reasonable, but in no way could be an attempt to paint him as an anti-Semite. Racist, I suppose you could make that charge, but why antisemite? Unless unbeknownst to the world they contained questionable antisemitic content.

All in all, an embarrassment for the Republican Party. Paul should make his newsletters public and name the author, else the charge that they were simply survivalist/white supremacist/militia garbage will stick. The GOP doesn’t need what Medved refers to as a candidate for neonazis in the race. Paul needs to clear these issues as best as he can.

82 posted on 11/10/2007 3:26:04 AM PST by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan

ANY INFO ON RON PAUL WITH ANTISEMITIC SENTIMENTS?

Mrs. Esopman


90 posted on 11/10/2007 7:29:51 AM PST by esopman (Blessings on Freepers Everywhere (and Their Most Intelligent Designer))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

On the bash of Dole and Kemp for supporting the closing of the PLO offices in the US, it’s worth noting he also praised Matti Peled, a member of the Israeli Knesset for opposing the bill.

Matti Peled was elected as a member of the Progressive List for Peace, a small party who elected 2 candidates in the 1980s. The party was, in fact, banned on the basis of negation of the existence of the State of Israel as the state of the Jewish people over their support for either a one state solution, or a “right of return” to Israel for all Arabs. The Israeli Supreme Court overturned the ban.

Interesting, the “true Republican” attacks Dole and Kemp, and lauds the Israeli extreme left.

98 posted on 11/11/2007 3:16:58 AM PST by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LSUfan
A LEAD BALLOON to Jack Kemp (R-NY) and Bob Dole (R-KS) who have introduced legislation to forcibly close the Palestinian Information Office in Washington. They would also ban delegates from the Palestinian Liberation Organization at the United Nations.

So did this legislation come to a recorded vote? Might be interesting to look back and see who else opposed it...

The UN always seems to be up to something anti-American, which is why I agree with Ron Paul that we should stop sending them money.
99 posted on 11/11/2007 3:45:59 AM PST by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson