Posted on 11/13/2007 9:09:44 AM PST by sharkhawk
Four transplant recipients in Chicago contracted HIV from a high-risk organ donor whose infection went undetected in what hospital officials say is the first documented case of the virus being transmitted by organ donation in the U.S. in more than 20 years....
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
A screening questionnaire determined that the organ donor had engaged in high-risk behavior...
But tests for HIV, hepatitis and other conditions came back negative, most likely because the donor had acquired the infections in the last three weeks before death...
10 to 1 on what the risky behavior was?
Running with scissors?
Sitting on a dirty toilet seat?
/sarcasm
Heroin user, client of prostitute, someone from a developing country, tattooed individual?
When did he fill out the questionnaire?
LOL!
Hillary Care!
Skydiving, biting lug nuts off moving Mack trucks, shouting "I'm glad Che's dead" at a Kos convention, tooting for Rudy on FR, holding a door for a feminist, ...
My guess, and this is only a guess is that whoever had the power of attorney, or next of kin filled out some kind of questionaire.
I questioned the risky behaviour because of the dust up last year on some college campuses to relax or delete the ban on homosexuals donating blood.
” holding a door for a feminist,”
I made the mistake of doing that once years ago. After I got reamed out, I said I was sorry for assuming she was a lady.
Organs came from Gift of Hope Organ Procurement from Elmhurst - to Northwestern, Uof Chicago and Rush
To add to #6, It’s filled out by the next of kin, family, others that knew the donor well
I still do it - because my mother taught me right. However, now I make sure the equipment isn’t vulnerable to a swift attack from a hairy leg.
Asking Hillary a tough question? (Boxers or briefs?)
This allows “high risk” individuals to donate, along with their friends, without anyone knowing about their “risky behaviour”. That way, homosexuals can donate blood — but, it doesn’t get used. (Provided that they’re even a bit honest.)
this reminds me of a Law and Order show where a MAN died of ovarian cancer.....from a transplant.
It was one hell of a show.
The US has the same “safeguards”. However some College GLBT activists were going around telling people to lie on the form since it was “discriminating” against homosexuals, and the blood was tested for the virus anyway.
What, if in addition to risky sex, they have ADD and forget to check the "don't use" box? Political Correctness is always a bad idea!
About 20 years ago, my best friend lost both her teenage sons (her only children) to AIDS. Both boys were hemophiliacs and had received tainted blood transfusions.
But God forbid you tell one of them they can't donate their tainted organs and you'll have the ACLU on you.
Tainted blood was a huge issue in Canada — we even had a full-blown Royal Commission look into it. The Red Cross was prohibited from collecting any more blood & a new independent blood collection agency was established.
Even after all of that the “gay community” was up in arms when the new blood collection agency announced that it would not use the blood from high-risk individuals (e.g. “men who have sex with men”). It was a remarkable display of chutzpah — one that could only happen in real life, because no fiction writer could dream up anything so absurd. Much as they cried “discrimination”, the “gay” lobbyists couldn’t get any traction with the public — because everyone knew the risks too well by then.
To be fair. They did say the rules are in cases such as this, that the recipient should be informed and sign off on the donation. The hospitals would not confirm that this was done, however we have to consider that the number of organ matches are small, and the need is so great. It is a tough call.
Wasn’t that blood received from prisoners in Ark. Sent by that known humanist Slick Willy?
Like when Arkansas sold HIV tainted blood of it's prison population to Canada when Slick Willie was governor?
And we have the homosexual activists demanding “The Right” to donate blood.
Imagine for a moment what the reaction would be if it were discovered that some of this blood came from Texas prisons, while GWB was governor. As it is, Willie just got yet another pass.
“Like when Arkansas sold HIV tainted blood of it’s prison population to Canada when Slick Willie was governor?”
I was thinking the same thing, you beat me to it.
Organ donation is life or death, you receive the organ and you may live, you don’t get them you die. So, it’s small comfort to these individuals, that yes, you’ll live, but you have aids. How would we decide? Indeed a tough call.
And if he filled out a questionnaire and admitted that he engaged in high risk behavior, then why did the medical community use his organs?
They know that the virus needs time to incubate and a negative is meaningless.
Since when can’t you donate because you have allergies? Lots of people have allergies. Are you talking life-threatening allergies like food allergies or something?
Some medications are also a no-go for donation, and if the poster is on one of those medications FOR the allergies, then they’d be rejected.
Thanks for the background info. I guess I should have thought that those circumstances would also be taken into consideration. I’m not on anything that isn’t OTC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.