Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What a Time Inc. Spin-Off Might Look Like (Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™)
Folio ^ | November 15, 2007 | Bill Mickey

Posted on 11/16/2007 11:18:50 AM PST by abb

"Bewkes is not a magazine guy."

Time Warner’s third quarter numbers were released recently, and while overall revenues rose nine percent over same period 2006—despite revenue declines from AOL—Time Inc.’s revenues were flat. Any gains in earnings were largely attributed to “non-magazine businesses, particularly Synapse,” a customer acquisition and management service subsidiary of Time Inc., according to company financials. The numbers form the backdrop of a pending change at the top as COO Jeffrey Bewkes is set to succeed Dick Parsons as Time Warner CEO on January 1 and ongoing speculation about whether the company will spin off one or more of its divisions—namely Time Inc.

In the third quarter, a $25 million gain in advertising revenues came mostly from digital growth from People.com and CNNMoney.com, which was offset by an actual loss from print magazine revenues. Included in that loss was the closures of LIFE and Teen People, an $8 million loss from subscription revenues and a $1 million loss in “Content” revenue. So, not much top-line success.

Even before it was announced that Bewkes would succeed Parsons, speculation about Time Inc.’s future ran rampant. Now, however, Bewkes’ new role with the company is raising new questions.

“Bewkes is not a magazine guy, which I think is very important,” says one magazine industry observer. “He’s a TV guy. And I think that when you get right down to it, the core properties that Bewkes knows about and cares about are the video and movies, not print. Because even if they invest heavily in developing new digital versions of their magazines, it’s going to cost money. Meanwhile the revenue is going to continue to be flat to declining.”

Reed Phillips, managing partner at DeSilva + Phillips, stresses that while commenting on Time Inc.’s future is purely conjecture at this point, Bewkes’ succession will trigger a top-down examination of the corporate structure. “I do believe that everything is going to be evaluated in Time Warner by Bewkes coming in,” says Phillips. “In January the clock will start ticking and there’s going to be more scrutiny and more willingness to sell assets that they don’t think will be helping the company increase its stock price.”

While a looser divestment attitude might come into play, an industry source speculates a spin-off makes the most sense. “If you’re looking at it from his point of view, you want to detach Time Inc. from the company so the chance of a spin-off is probably very high. I don’t think there’s a chance of a sale because I don’t think anyone would buy it.”

A spin-off could benefit both entities. Time Warner gets to move Time Inc. off the books as an operating unit and Time Inc. becomes a free-standing, public company. “It’s an IPO, in effect,” says the source.

A public Time Inc. would also be free to make more aggressive moves in the digital arena. “It would have more flexibility to do that kind of thing and also have a chance to raise its own money rather than having to fight the rest of the divisions of Time Warner for the assets," says a source. "A lot of money is being used elsewhere because people within Time Warner look at the magazine group and don’t think they should invest money there, it’s not worth it.”

The source also speculates that a spun-off Time Inc. would likely mean the end of the Ann Moore regime. Her replacement? “I think Bewkes would put in somebody that has free-standing, public company experience. My candidate would be Susan Lyne. She’s been in television, she knows Bewkes, and she’s been successful with Martha Stewart Omnimedia. She’s CEO of a public company. She’s got the credentials.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dbm; magazines; time; timewarner

The Future of TIME

1 posted on 11/16/2007 11:18:51 AM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; backhoe; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...

ping


2 posted on 11/16/2007 11:19:23 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
TIME has Come Today

Turn Back The Hands of TIME

TIME (Clock Of The Heart)

TIME After TIME

For The Longest TIME

TIME Waits For No One

TIME Will Crawl

I Ain't Got TIME Anymore

Monkey TIME

3 posted on 11/16/2007 11:19:46 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb
How could you leave this out?
4 posted on 11/16/2007 11:25:24 AM PST by Tribune7 (Dems want to rob from the poor to give to the rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Or this one?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVU9gyNjjGY

Actually, I tried to put up music that had charted on Billboard’s Pop Singles charts. I stand corrected if Pink Floyd’s “Time” charted.


5 posted on 11/16/2007 11:33:45 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb; mikrofon; Charles Henrickson
What a Time Inc. Spin-Off Might Look Like

Strictly SmallTime.

6 posted on 11/16/2007 1:36:48 PM PST by martin_fierro (I'm OverTime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Looking at this as having an IPO for Time is about as positive a spin as can be had.

Such a beast’s stock would, if not at first, drop like a rock.

I only hope liberals lose their pants while supporting such stuff.


7 posted on 11/16/2007 2:46:28 PM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson