Skip to comments.What a Time Inc. Spin-Off Might Look Like (Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™)
Posted on 11/16/2007 11:18:50 AM PST by abb
"Bewkes is not a magazine guy."
Time Warners third quarter numbers were released recently, and while overall revenues rose nine percent over same period 2006despite revenue declines from AOLTime Inc.s revenues were flat. Any gains in earnings were largely attributed to non-magazine businesses, particularly Synapse, a customer acquisition and management service subsidiary of Time Inc., according to company financials. The numbers form the backdrop of a pending change at the top as COO Jeffrey Bewkes is set to succeed Dick Parsons as Time Warner CEO on January 1 and ongoing speculation about whether the company will spin off one or more of its divisionsnamely Time Inc.
In the third quarter, a $25 million gain in advertising revenues came mostly from digital growth from People.com and CNNMoney.com, which was offset by an actual loss from print magazine revenues. Included in that loss was the closures of LIFE and Teen People, an $8 million loss from subscription revenues and a $1 million loss in Content revenue. So, not much top-line success.
Even before it was announced that Bewkes would succeed Parsons, speculation about Time Inc.s future ran rampant. Now, however, Bewkes new role with the company is raising new questions.
Bewkes is not a magazine guy, which I think is very important, says one magazine industry observer. Hes a TV guy. And I think that when you get right down to it, the core properties that Bewkes knows about and cares about are the video and movies, not print. Because even if they invest heavily in developing new digital versions of their magazines, its going to cost money. Meanwhile the revenue is going to continue to be flat to declining.
Reed Phillips, managing partner at DeSilva + Phillips, stresses that while commenting on Time Inc.s future is purely conjecture at this point, Bewkes succession will trigger a top-down examination of the corporate structure. I do believe that everything is going to be evaluated in Time Warner by Bewkes coming in, says Phillips. In January the clock will start ticking and theres going to be more scrutiny and more willingness to sell assets that they dont think will be helping the company increase its stock price.
While a looser divestment attitude might come into play, an industry source speculates a spin-off makes the most sense. If youre looking at it from his point of view, you want to detach Time Inc. from the company so the chance of a spin-off is probably very high. I dont think theres a chance of a sale because I dont think anyone would buy it.
A spin-off could benefit both entities. Time Warner gets to move Time Inc. off the books as an operating unit and Time Inc. becomes a free-standing, public company. Its an IPO, in effect, says the source.
A public Time Inc. would also be free to make more aggressive moves in the digital arena. It would have more flexibility to do that kind of thing and also have a chance to raise its own money rather than having to fight the rest of the divisions of Time Warner for the assets," says a source. "A lot of money is being used elsewhere because people within Time Warner look at the magazine group and dont think they should invest money there, its not worth it.
The source also speculates that a spun-off Time Inc. would likely mean the end of the Ann Moore regime. Her replacement? I think Bewkes would put in somebody that has free-standing, public company experience. My candidate would be Susan Lyne. Shes been in television, she knows Bewkes, and shes been successful with Martha Stewart Omnimedia. Shes CEO of a public company. Shes got the credentials.
The Future of TIME
Or this one?
Actually, I tried to put up music that had charted on Billboard’s Pop Singles charts. I stand corrected if Pink Floyd’s “Time” charted.
Looking at this as having an IPO for Time is about as positive a spin as can be had.
Such a beast’s stock would, if not at first, drop like a rock.
I only hope liberals lose their pants while supporting such stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.