Skip to comments.
Rudy would appoint federal judges who adhere to Conservative Principles
Associated Press ^
| November 16, 2007
| Jim Kuhnhenn
Posted on 11/16/2007 8:48:43 PM PST by Senator Goldwater
WASHINGTON (AP) - Rudy Giuliani assured a conservative legal group Friday that if elected president he would appoint federal judges who adhere to their principles. He also praised a judge who declared the capital city's gun ban unconstitutional and ridiculed efforts to eliminate the words "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance.
In a speech marking the 25th anniversary of the Federalist Society, Giuliani spelled out a conservative legal agenda in which he cited Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts as models for the judges he would appoint to the federal bench.
He contended that Democrats Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama or John Edwards, as president, would select judges who were "activists and try to legislate social policy."
"We're seeking to find judges who understand the very, very important concept that judges exist to interpret the law, not to invent the law," he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 3timesalady; 911fubar; abortion; adultery; americasmayoress; amnesty; askthefdny; askthenypd; banglist; bernardkerik; brokebackmanhattan; cantbeathillary; conservatives; constructionist; corporalklinger; corruption; cronyism; crossdresser; dictator; dragqueen; election; electionpresident; elections; fauxcatholic; firearms; flipflop; foxnews; gayfriendly; gaymarriage; gop; gungrabber; hillaryindrag; homosexualagenda; ilduce; illegals; julieannie; kickbacks; laraza; logcabinrepublican; marchingwithnambla; mobbedup; mussolini; nounplusverbplus911; ourelliotspitzer; philanderer; president; prevaricator; proabortion; rainbows4ever; republicans; rinorudy; rinos; rockefellergop; rudy; sanctuarycities; scandals; scotus; seanhannity; sham; strict; thirdparty; threescompany; thricemarries; transvestite; tyrant; willandgraciemansion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-110 next last
Giuliani once again negates concerns over his social positions by supporting strict constructionists to the federal bench, unlike in NYC, where Rudy had to appoint judges from a Democrat-chosen slate.
To: Senator Goldwater
I just threw up in my mouth a little....wait...no, quite a bit....be back in a jiffy....
2
posted on
11/16/2007 8:51:12 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
To: Senator Goldwater
Giuliani:
“That is not the critical factor.
And what’s important to me is to have a very intelligent, very honest, very good lawyer on the court.
And [John Roberts] fits that category, in the same way Justice Ginsburg fit that category.
I mean, she was — she maybe came at it from a very different political background, very qualified lawyer, very smart person.
3
posted on
11/16/2007 8:53:18 PM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
To: Senator Goldwater
Rudy Giuliani assured a conservative legal group Friday that if elected president he would appoint federal judges who adhere to their principles. Name 'em now.
4
posted on
11/16/2007 8:53:34 PM PST
by
Mojave
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I just threw up in my mouth a little....wait...no, quite a bit....be back in a jiffy.... Take your time....don't hurry...
5
posted on
11/16/2007 8:54:25 PM PST
by
Jorge
To: Senator Goldwater
Giuliani Judges Lean Left http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2957.html
I don't particlarly have a beef with Giuliani personally, but it begins to trouble me what his supporters are willing to imply, that isn't true.
Giuliani has no credibility whatsoever when it comes to claiming he'll appoint conservative judges.
6
posted on
11/16/2007 8:57:50 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
To: Mojave
Name ‘em now.
If it convinces some stray Hillary enablers on this board, I think he should.
To: Senator Goldwater
It would read like an ACLU membership roster.
8
posted on
11/16/2007 9:02:23 PM PST
by
Mojave
To: Senator Goldwater
Bullsh!t. He refuses to even admit that Roe was bad law. I don’t trust him in the judges issue.
9
posted on
11/16/2007 9:03:23 PM PST
by
DesScorp
To: Senator Goldwater
10
posted on
11/16/2007 9:05:12 PM PST
by
perfect_rovian_storm
(John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
"And [John Roberts] fits that category, in the same way Justice Ginsburg fit that category." Rudy Hilliani is amazing.
11
posted on
11/16/2007 9:06:00 PM PST
by
Mojave
To: Senator Goldwater
Rudy would appoint federal judges who adhere to Conservative Principles
In a pig's eye, he would.
12
posted on
11/16/2007 9:06:11 PM PST
by
papasmurf
(sudo apt - get install FRed Thompson)
To: DoughtyOne
Rudy made seventy-five judicial appointments. Six of those were Republican.
At least fifty were democrats. I don’t know what the other nineteen were.
13
posted on
11/16/2007 9:11:26 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
To: Senator Goldwater
"Giuliani once again negates concerns over his social positions by supporting strict constructionists to the federal bench, unlike in NYC, where Rudy had to appoint judges from a Democrat-chosen slate."
How do you know if Rudy is lying?
If his lips are moving!
To: Senator Goldwater
Sir you are correct...and you have brass balls to speak favorably about Rudy on this site.
His is the best commentary I've heard on legal affairs since Romney's proposal to consult lawyers to determine whther we ought to hit a nuclear Iran:)
The only other person even coming close to talking this talk is Fred Thompson...and I believe they'll (Rudy/Fred) be the only two left standing come Feb 6th.
15
posted on
11/16/2007 9:13:29 PM PST
by
Mariner
To: Mariner
"The only other person even coming close to talking this talk is Fred Thompson...and I believe they'll (Rudy/Fred) be the only two left standing come Feb 6th." From your mouth to God's ear...
16
posted on
11/16/2007 9:15:29 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
To: Senator Goldwater
"Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine." - Rudy Giuliani
17
posted on
11/16/2007 9:17:16 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Our God-given rights, and those of our posterity, are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: Mariner
Oh please, don’t compare a great candidate like Fred Thompson with the lousy Mr. Unelectable.
To: Mariner
I have no idea what you see in Giuliani that overcomes his downside.
19
posted on
11/16/2007 9:23:50 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
To: Senator Goldwater
Fortunately, Giuliani has a history we can look at to see how ludicrous these statements are, and how he apparently feels not even the slightest guilt in misrepresenting (aka completely lying about) his entire political career.
20
posted on
11/16/2007 9:30:39 PM PST
by
COgamer
To: Senator Goldwater; DoughtyOne; Mojave; EternalVigilance
Yeah, right, Rudy. You'd probably put Hillary on SCOTUS, the strong and honest Conservative YOU are.
That might be her secret wish anyway.
Along with her husband serving in the U.N. as Screwtape General.
21
posted on
11/16/2007 9:33:49 PM PST
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: DoughtyOne
Rudy is the anti-jihad.
He will win against those heathen hordes and rid the planet of their political philosophy.
He sees this issue as clear as GW Bush, and better than any other candidate.
22
posted on
11/16/2007 9:38:48 PM PST
by
Mariner
To: DoughtyOne
“Rudy made seventy-five judicial appointments. Six of those were Republican.
At least fifty were democrats. I dont know what the other nineteen were.”
I had heard that his record on appointments was not good, but have not researched it. Would not vote for Rudy for many reasons, not just his record concerning judicial appointments.
To: Senator Goldwater
24
posted on
11/16/2007 9:46:20 PM PST
by
badpacifist
(They say your head can be a prison Then, these are just conjugal visits.)
To: DesScorp
“Bullsh!t. He refuses to even admit that Roe was bad law. I dont trust him in the judges issue.”
Why not trust a guy who says he will do the right thing (appoint strict constructionists) even though he genuinely thinks it’s the wrong thing.
I can support a guy who basically says that he will do what he thinks is wrong...can’t you?
25
posted on
11/16/2007 9:47:16 PM PST
by
DemEater
To: Mariner
He couldn’t even stand up to an evil group of child molestors, instead he marched in a parade with them.
Such “courage”.
26
posted on
11/16/2007 9:49:05 PM PST
by
Politicalmom
(Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
To: Senator Goldwater
This like some science fiction nightmare, there is no reason for conservative voters that know all about Rudy and his politics to become zombies.
Do you guys really think that you are going to convert this audience of die hard, dedicated conservatives?
And by the way, as a freeper why aren’t you guys on our side?
27
posted on
11/16/2007 9:49:40 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Proud father of a 10th Mountain veteran. Proud son of a WWII vet. Proud brother of vets, Airborne)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I just threw up in my mouth a little....wait...no, quite a bit.... Thank you Vet, for your service as well as that line, probably saved my cookies...
28
posted on
11/16/2007 9:51:27 PM PST
by
Gilbo_3
(A few Rams must look after the sheep 'til the Good Shepherd returns...)
To: Mariner
“Rudy is the anti-jihad.
He will win against those heathen hordes and rid the planet of their political philosophy.
He sees this issue as clear as GW Bush, and better than any other candidate.”
No body was more often bitch slapped by radical Islam than Mayor Rudy.
29
posted on
11/16/2007 9:58:21 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Proud father of a 10th Mountain veteran. Proud son of a WWII vet. Proud brother of vets, Airborne)
To: Senator Goldwater
If it convinces some stray Hillary enablers on this board, I think he should. clinton 'enablers'???
nominating rudey guarantees the b!tch a return to the white house.
I will NOT vote for a gun grabbing, cross dressing liberal LIAR !!!
30
posted on
11/16/2007 10:02:43 PM PST
by
Gilbo_3
(A few Rams must look after the sheep 'til the Good Shepherd returns...)
To: Senator Goldwater
Let’s ask Rudy’s kids how good his promises are...
31
posted on
11/16/2007 10:02:46 PM PST
by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: Senator Goldwater
And he also has a bridge for sale in Brooklyn that you can pick up cheap.
32
posted on
11/16/2007 10:05:16 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: Senator Goldwater
If it convinces some stray Hillary enablers on this board, I think he should. You know damn well he'd never do that because he doesn't plan on expending any political capital trying to get such judges nominated.
33
posted on
11/16/2007 10:06:15 PM PST
by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: SoConPubbie
Now, who are you going to believe? Rudy or your lying eyes?
34
posted on
11/16/2007 10:07:05 PM PST
by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: DemEater
Why not trust a guy who says he will do the right thing (appoint strict constructionists) even though he genuinely thinks its the wrong thing. Because he has a liberal record and is thrice-married adulterer that paraded his mistress around New York while alienating his wife and kids? And, because he associates with pedophile priests and crooks like Bernard Kerik?
35
posted on
11/16/2007 10:09:58 PM PST
by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
I don’t know if he’d go that far, but if he isn’t a die hard go along to get along guy, I sure don’t know one when I see one.
36
posted on
11/16/2007 10:16:03 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
To: Mariner
I don’t believe that Rudy sees the War on Terrorism any better than the other candidates. That being said, even if he does see the war as Bush does, look at the downside of having Bush for a President.
I’ll be damned if I want another person of the same relative mindset to serve for another eight years.
For this guy, RINOs need not apply. Moving slowly left winds up getting us to the same destination as the democrats will, only slower.
It’s time to take a right turn on the road to our future.
37
posted on
11/16/2007 10:20:21 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
To: seekthetruth
38
posted on
11/16/2007 10:21:05 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
To: Mariner
You're wasting your time arguing with these Rudy-haters, they are beyond reason. They are hoping secretly that Hillary will win. They want a Hillary Clinton Presidency because they are fools enough to believe that it will help the Conservative cause.
It's no different than arguing with Liberals, all emotion, no reason.
39
posted on
11/16/2007 10:21:31 PM PST
by
Sudetenland
(Liberals love "McCarthyism," they just believe he was targeting the wrong side.)
To: Mariner
He will win against those heathen hordes Isn't Rudy the moronic ass who put New York's disaster response headquarters at ground zero?
40
posted on
11/16/2007 10:35:08 PM PST
by
Mojave
To: Sudetenland; Mariner
“You’re wasting your time arguing with these Rudy-haters, they are beyond reason. They are hoping secretly that Hillary will win. They want a Hillary Clinton Presidency because they are fools enough to believe that it will help the Conservative cause.
It’s no different than arguing with Liberals, all emotion, no reason.”
Mariner, he is your guy, impressed?
41
posted on
11/16/2007 10:36:12 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Proud father of a 10th Mountain veteran. Proud son of a WWII vet. Proud brother of vets, Airborne)
To: Mojave
“Isn’t Rudy the moronic ass who put New York’s disaster response headquarters at ground zero?”
I think that is the proof for millions of us that Rudy doesn’t have the kind of mind that is good at war and military matters.
An army private or any human that thinks in a tactical way would think that the widely identified number one terrorist target in NYC is not the place to place your brain center.
Only an idiot would clear out the wreckage from the previous terrorist bombing of the city’s symbol to place his emergency command center in the repaired symbol.
42
posted on
11/16/2007 10:49:01 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Proud father of a 10th Mountain veteran. Proud son of a WWII vet. Proud brother of vets, Airborne)
To: Senator Goldwater
And, Rudy also claimed today that under his Presidency, the Sun will rise in the West each and every single day.
To: Senator Goldwater
Why would a flaming liberal appoint conservative judges?
44
posted on
11/16/2007 11:25:57 PM PST
by
Redcloak
(This post certified 100% Hillary-free. um... Never mind.)
To: Senator Goldwater

Picture of a Presidential candidate exhibiting a serious lack of judgment.
This tops Dukakis in his tank outfit. Dems will have a field day with Julie-boy.
Stop Rudy in the primaries.
To: Mariner
Rudy is the anti-jihad. RINO-rudy is on his own, TWISTED, ARROGANT and MISGUIDED, UN-AMERICAN JI-HAD...
A jihad against our 2nd Amendment RIGHTS.
A jihad against innocent life.
A jihad where the gay agenda is to the forefront (hell, even the ragheaded terrorist bastards don't go for THAT sh*t)
A jihad that lets the illegal hordes have a "sanctuary" in our country, and lets the REAL jihadists have an easy IN into our society to kill and maim at will.
RINO-rudy is DANGEROUS to our Republican party, AND...
to AMERICA.
Just say "NO!" to ANY and ALL LIBERAL RINO bastards running for REPUBLICAN President of the United States.
46
posted on
11/16/2007 11:50:50 PM PST
by
DocH
(RINO-rudy for BRONX Dog Catcher 2008!!!)
To: Senator Goldwater
unlike in NYC, where Rudy had to appoint judges from a Democrat-chosen slate. That's false. Rudy had total control over whether or not he picked from the panel's recommendations. He even had the power to do away with the panel any time he wanted.
There is no reason to believe that Rudy would appoint any better judges than the liberals he appointed as mayor.
47
posted on
11/17/2007 12:07:07 AM PST
by
SUSSA
To: Senator Goldwater
48
posted on
11/17/2007 12:17:34 AM PST
by
DryFly
To: Senator Goldwater
Oh, Brother! How STUPID do they think we ARE??
49
posted on
11/17/2007 12:19:02 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(AmericanInTokyo; Count THIS Freeper as solidly behind DUNCAN HUNTER 2008!!!)
To: Sudetenland
Rudy is the enemy of conservatism and so are his supporters.
Conservatives don't support liberals.
Rudy is in the wrong party and his supporters are at the wrong website.
Standing on principle is well reasoned, while waving around Hillary and Terrorism like they are boogymen is simply an appeal to emotion.
That's what liberals do. Go pedal your papers.
50
posted on
11/17/2007 1:00:36 AM PST
by
Manic_Episode
(Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson