Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan pickle
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | November 16, 2007 | Editorial

Posted on 11/17/2007 1:42:09 PM PST by Graybeard58

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: RightWhale

Right Whale - you are right on.

I say we give Pervez a little more time. People are getting all up in arms about his declaring a state of emergency, well, people are forgetting:

a.) That the Supreme Court was seriously undermining the prosecution of the Islamists. This all started unwinding because of the clean out of that Islamist rat’s nest - the Red Mosque.

b.) The Islamists were kicking the a$$ of the Frontier Guide (a sort of homeboy militia rife with corruption and sloth) in Swat. It was out of control. Desertions were wholesale and the Islamists had managed to get within 100 miles of Islamabad and it’s nukes. Couple that with the bombing of Benazir Bhutto’s welcome home parade...Something had to be done.

c.) The Pakistani merchant class is firmly behind Musharraf. The economy of Pakistan has improved every year that he has been in power.

I say let’s give this thing some more time.

About Benazir Bhutto - Beware. She’s the Pakistani Pelosi, people. Her govt was 1 of 4 in the whole wide world that recognized the Taliban in Afghanistan. And her corruption? I wouldn’t want to touch that with a 10 foot pole.

(P.S I’m no expert on Pakistan but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night.)


21 posted on 11/17/2007 8:16:29 PM PST by Dinah Lord (fighting the Islamofascist Jihad - one keystroke at a time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dinah Lord; Marine_Uncle

You make good sense...so why are we trying to broker a power sharing deal with Bhutto?


22 posted on 11/17/2007 8:19:44 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Thanks for the tip, GB58!

Helped my eyes out!


23 posted on 11/17/2007 8:22:56 PM PST by exit82 (I believe Juanita--Hillary enabled Juanita's rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dinah Lord

One more thing about Benazir:

You call house arrest a bad thing? I don’t know. Within 12 hours of arriving back in the country you are bombed and a bunch of people are killed. But there you are sitting in your villa, protected by security and receiving a US Envoy for tea. After that you are able to give interviews on the veranda with every major media outlet in the WORLD.

And the house arrest only lasted what - 48 hrs?

Please.


24 posted on 11/17/2007 8:24:33 PM PST by Dinah Lord (fighting the Islamofascist Jihad - one keystroke at a time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
You make good sense...so why are we trying to broker a power sharing deal with Bhutto?

I wish to he[[ I could figure that out!

I'm still working on it. It's almost like a chess move on a chess board - but I'm not seeing all the pieces yet!

25 posted on 11/17/2007 8:29:00 PM PST by Dinah Lord (fighting the Islamofascist Jihad - one keystroke at a time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Damn if I know. Musshy taint no saint, but at least he has keep the place from going ballistic. It is late, and I have to get up early for work. I started to prepare a long response but felt over the next few days of brutal schedules I may not be in the position to offer rebuttals to what I would have written. And quite frankly I am a bit confused to just how Bhutto would really improve things in Pakistan.
It seems more like she is being sponsored by a bunch of lawyers, and people in given provinces that really do not have the country as a whole best interests in hand.
She has made it clear she is not responsible. This is no time for her to be inciting riots and million person marches.
She had her chance. It appears she screwed up pretty bad and to boot was a thief. At any rate, I gotta hit the rack. Do have a great upcoming day.
26 posted on 11/17/2007 8:59:06 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Duncan Hunter for POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dinah Lord

Umm-first of all,ever since General Ayub Khan came to power in the late 1950s,the Pakistani army has always controlled critical policy decisions-like those relating to India,China,nukes,radical Islam... & in later years,the Taliban/Afghanistan.Benazir recognised the Taliban,because if she wouldn’t the Army would ensure she would.

About her corruption-ofcourse she is very corrupt.But only as corrupt as the largest industrial & welfare organisation in Pakistan-which happens to be the Pakistani army,headed by a General Pervez Musharraf.

About the economy,well it usually grows big time,when you have Uncle Sam pouring in tons of civil & military aid & when the Japanese had also lifted their aid ban(after Sept.11).You really don’t need to do much.The same was witnessed after the US sewed up alliances with Ayub Khan & Zia Ul Haq-though both would lead their country to later disaster-where Musharraf is headed.

About the Supreme Court-umm what’s the purpose of a judiciary if it can’t ask the government for accountability????Might as well wind it up-which Musharraf has done.All it did was ask the government for an explanation on people who had disappeared in connection with anti-terror operations.As well as question the legitimacy of privatisation/sale of government assets to people who were close to Musharraf & his cronies.

Same goes for the Swat valley-the Paki army has adopted a 2 handed approach.Use some heavy force to put up a show,while concentrating on appeasing the insurgents-didn’t work out well.But don’t expect them to stay down if you think Islamabad is in sight.These insurgents are localised with ethnic/sectarian characteristics-much like other Islamists in Pakistan.They will fight with each other as much as they fight against Uncle Sam or the Paki army.


27 posted on 11/17/2007 9:08:19 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle; Dinah Lord

Bhutto is sponsored by the US government to form a power-sharing agreement with Musharraf.She’d take over the prime ministership,while Mush would hand up his fatigues take over as President-So the army would supposedly go back to barracks & Pakistan would be “democratic” again.This pathetic charade has happened more than once since Pakistan’s birth.


28 posted on 11/17/2007 9:10:30 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson