Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Key findings of UN scientific report (UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 11/17/07 | AP

Posted on 11/17/2007 7:19:26 PM PST by NormsRevenge

The following are some key findings in a report issued Saturday by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change:

• Global warming is "unequivocal." Temperatures have risen 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit in the last 100 years. Eleven of the last 12 years are among the warmest since 1850. Sea levels have gone up by an average seven-hundredths of an inch per year since 1961.

• About 20 percent to 30 percent of all plant and animal species face the risk of extinction if temperatures increase by 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit. If the thermometer rises by 6.3 degrees Fahrenheit, between 40 to 70 percent of species could disappear.

• Human activity is largely responsible for warming. Global emissions of greenhouse gases grew 70 percent from 1970 to 2004. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is far higher than the natural range over the last 650,000 years.

• Climate change will affect poor countries most, but will be felt everywhere. By 2020, 75 million to 250 million people in Africa will suffer water shortages, residents of Asia's large cities will be at great risk of river and coastal flooding, Europeans can expect extensive species loss, and North Americans will experience longer and hotter heat waves and greater competition for water.

• Extreme weather conditions will be more common. Tropical storms will be more frequent and intense. Heat waves and heavy rains will affect some areas, raising the risk of wildfires and the spread of diseases. Elsewhere, drought will degrade cropland and spoil the quality of water sources. Rising sea levels will increase flooding and salination of fresh water and threaten coastal cities.

• Even if greenhouse gases are stabilized, the Earth will keep warming and sea levels rising. More pollution could bring "abrupt and irreversible" changes, such as the loss of ice sheets in the poles, and a corresponding rise in sea levels by several yards.

_A wide array of tools exist, or will soon be available, to adapt to climate change and reduce its potential effects. One is to put a price on carbon emissions.

• By 2050, stabilizing emissions would slow the average annual global economic growth by less than 0.12 percent. The longer action is delayed, the more it will cost.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: climatechange; findings; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; gorebalism; ipcc; scientific
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2007 7:19:27 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

.

Indonesian environmental activists roll a giant globe on the street during a demonstration calling for the government to take immediate action to reduce carbon emission at the main business district in Jakarta, Indonesia, Friday, Nov. 16, 2007. Indonesia is scheduled to host a U.N. conference on climate change next month on Bali island to discuss the next stage in global efforts to control emissions from greenhouse gases blamed for global warming. (AP Photo/Dita Alangkara)


2 posted on 11/17/2007 7:22:30 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Grand Huckster of our time?

Former Vice President Al Gore smiles after speaking at a news conference in Palo Alto, Calif., in this Oct. 12, 2007 file photo. Gore on Monday, Nov. 12, 2007 announced that he's joining Silicon Valley's most prestigious venture capital firm to guide investments to combat global warming. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, file)

3 posted on 11/17/2007 7:24:28 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

A penguin strolls past a research station in Antartica. UN chief Ban Ki-moon will fly into tropical Brazil to further push his campaign for world action on climate change, after making a trip to chilly Antarctica.(AFP/Rodrigo Arangua)

Right photo - UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon poses at the Korean King Sejong station during his visit to Antartica. Ban flew to Antarctica on Friday on a fact-finding mission for climate change, becoming the first UN leader to make an official visit to the frozen continent.(AFP/Rodrigo Arangua)


4 posted on 11/17/2007 7:27:27 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Key findings of UN scientific report (UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC)
-

lay off the caps lock. Should read: Key findings of unscientific report


5 posted on 11/17/2007 7:29:21 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Three years from now, the “anthropogenic” global warming hucksters will admit it was all a hoax, and the whole world had just been “punk’t”.

Ashton Kutcher couldn’t have done it better.


6 posted on 11/17/2007 7:29:39 PM PST by alloysteel (Ignorance is no handicap for some people in a debate. They just get more shrill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Shhhh...Leep this just between us FReepers...

See we all know global warming is real and humans are the main cause. In fact we encourage humans to do what they can to heat things up because good capitalists that we are, we've already invested in the northern territoris in Canada and can't wait for people to move there. We'll be able to sell the land at top dollar and make windfall profits such as the world has never seen!

Shhh now...it's just between us.

prisoner6

7 posted on 11/17/2007 7:30:20 PM PST by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
So we should begin preparing for inevitable climate change rather than buying carbon credits.

Smart money will be buying real estate near coasts, but at at least 200 ft above sea level.

North country agriculture will be an economic force.

Makes more sense than forcing us to buy Gorebulbs and marching in the streets.

8 posted on 11/17/2007 7:31:24 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6

no problemo.. I’m about to buy a new vehicle soon, I will not even consider a hybrid.. it doesn’t fit my lifestyle or my red neck. ;-)


9 posted on 11/17/2007 7:32:17 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; dead; monkapotamus; All

Dead and Monk get your photoshopper butt in here LOL!


10 posted on 11/17/2007 7:33:55 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6

no no let’s get liberals to invest their dollars there


11 posted on 11/17/2007 7:34:18 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
"Eleven of the last 12 years are among the warmest since 1850."

Somebody tell NASA. They just adjusted their numbers to say this is completely false.

12 posted on 11/17/2007 7:36:59 PM PST by boop (Who doesn't love poison pot pies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Temperatures have risen 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit in the last 100 years.

I may be mistaken but that amount is surely within their margin of error. And of course, this is assuming temperature records 70-80-90 years ago are as accurate as today.

Plus, how much of that 1.3 degree rise has been created by the heat islands of cities?

Eleven of the last 12 years are among the warmest since 1850

Again, they are assuming temperature readings were as accurate 150 years ago as they are now.

Plus, we were still coming out of what was called the little ice age back in 1850.

Sea levels have gone up by an average seven-hundredths of an inch per year since 1961

Okay, lets use their numbers: If sea levels have gone up .07 of an inch in 46 years, during which time the temp has supposedly gone up maybe 1 degree F, even if we have a 5 degree rise, that would add another 1/3 of an inch to sea levels?

Human activity is largely responsible for warming.

Utter and complete nonsense. The biggest contributors to global warming are the Sun and natural climate cycles.

North Americans will experience longer and hotter heat waves and greater competition for water.

Isn't that convenient? We have known for decades that water was going to become a huge problem, especially in the Western USA. And this is mainly due to huge population increases. But NOW they can claim that they predicted it because of man made global warming.

More pollution could bring "abrupt and irreversible" changes, such as the loss of ice sheets in the poles

Well, recent events obviously contradict that statement. While the Arctic has experienced a diminished ice sheet the last couple of years, the Antarctic ice sheet is now the thickest ever recorded, more than compensating for the ice loss in the arctic. But, lets not let facts get in the way.

You got to hand it to politicians: They will always come up with ways to excuse their confiscating more and more of our money through taxes, fees, fines, licenses, etc.

13 posted on 11/17/2007 7:37:25 PM PST by technomage (The true Conservative politician will beat a Demotraitor every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Well, if the UN is involved, it must be serious.

Global Warming for Food Program?

14 posted on 11/17/2007 7:38:12 PM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
One is to put a price on carbon emissions.

I wonder what the sound of 5 Billion Chinese laughing sounds like?

15 posted on 11/17/2007 7:39:53 PM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
By 2050, stabilizing emissions would slow the average annual global economic growth by less than 0.12 percent. The longer action is delayed, the more it will cost.

Lies.

They want 2-3 trillion in taxes - to start with, plus arrested development worldwide. Forever.

16 posted on 11/17/2007 7:42:41 PM PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Bullshit!


17 posted on 11/17/2007 7:46:09 PM PST by dbacks (Taglines for sale or rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Anything that comes from the UN should be suspect. Anything that comes from the UN that concerns global warming or climate change can and should be ignored. Americans who can not or will not ignore them should look at the history of the UN with regard to the sovereignty of the USA. And get a clue.
18 posted on 11/17/2007 7:47:22 PM PST by whipitgood (Let's burn some MEXICAN flags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

How can my paying higher taxes keep China from spewing trillions of tons of pollution into the air? When will they have to held accountable? OH, they are commies so they won’t!


19 posted on 11/17/2007 7:49:19 PM PST by dbacks (Taglines for sale or rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Grand Huckster of our time?

Ah yes, Al Gore, the man that repeatedly stated categorically that 2 BILLION people participated in "Live Earth"...

Statistics and logs show that less than 40 million watched or listened.

That's a 50 times exaggeration by The Huckster...

Shows how much truth means to him doesn't it?

20 posted on 11/17/2007 7:56:21 PM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
TO THE UN: ITs THE SUN , STUPID !!!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

21 posted on 11/17/2007 7:58:10 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Reminds me of a small prank I played in college. Our Nuclear Engineering Department’s sign was mysteriously changed to the “Unclear Engineering Dept. It took them forever to discover the first time the sign was changed, but after that, they were on the lookout for further tampering and restored it right away.


22 posted on 11/17/2007 8:01:33 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Global Warming” is as truthfully related to never ending, and quite cyclical, climate change as “Peak Oil” is related to the price of hydrocarbon-based fuels. Both are specious handwringing that is a very convenient excuse to increase government and decrease liberty.


23 posted on 11/17/2007 8:03:22 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; SunkenCiv
The Grand Huckster of our time?

Absolutely !

24 posted on 11/17/2007 8:22:07 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Basic References:

Lawrence Solomon's "The Deniers" (a series of articles on the view of scientists who have been labelled "Global Warming Deniers"):

Other References:



Antarctic Temperature Trend 1982-2004:


This map (left) shows key areas of Antarctica, including the vast East Antarctic ice sheet. The image on the right shows which areas of the continent's ice are thickening (coloured yellow and red) and thinning (coloured blue). © (Left)British Antarctic Survey, (Right)Science


25 posted on 11/17/2007 8:22:08 PM PST by sourcery (If Hillary is the next President, she may also be the last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat
“Global Warming” is as truthfully related to never ending, and quite cyclical, climate change as “Peak Oil” is related to the price of hydrocarbon-based fuels. Both are specious handwringing that is a very convenient excuse to increase government and decrease liberty.

That's very true. And that's why the Democrats and the liberal media keep trying to sell us the big lie of global warming, because these liberals/communists including Hillary Clinton are for bigger government and for less liberty (actually no liberty and totalitarian government).

26 posted on 11/17/2007 8:22:23 PM PST by Democrat_media
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Hyper-bloviation about GW ping


27 posted on 11/17/2007 8:28:16 PM PST by TenthAmendmentChampion (Global warming is to Revelations as the theory of evolution is to Genesis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Highter temps should mean fewer storms as temps equalize around the world. But hey, what are a few details when there’s money to be extorted?


28 posted on 11/17/2007 8:33:30 PM PST by TenthAmendmentChampion (Global warming is to Revelations as the theory of evolution is to Genesis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Further evidence that the whole thing is a scam. The whole claim of dire consequences if people don’t follow the orders of the UN is a common political ploy.


29 posted on 11/17/2007 8:33:33 PM PST by reasonmclucus (solving problems requires precise knowledge of the cause and nature of the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

How do they know?


30 posted on 11/17/2007 8:36:33 PM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery; Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; ...

Thanks sourcery for that post, and Ernest for the ping.


31 posted on 11/17/2007 8:38:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Saturday, November 17, 2007"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: technomage
Yes, temperature has risen about 0.5 C in the last 100 years. It has risen 1.1 C in the last 200 years. The last little ice age ended about 240 years ago, called the 'Dalton Minimum'. Anyone surprised that the temperature has risen since then? Anyone know why the little ice age ended -- Hint it wasn't CO2 rising.

Since the end of the last big ice age, about 11500 years ago, the sea has risen 400 feet or so. So why wouldn’t you expect the sea to be rising if the temperature has been rising since the last little ice age?

It’s called common sense, something the UN and their programs don’t have. Anyone remember how it went with the UN’s Oil for WMDs during the Iraq sanctions? How many UN members got rich? How many took bribes? And how well Saddam Hussein had stocked up for the day the inspectors left. What did that FBI guy say — Something like Saddam had what he needed to build a nuke warhead within a year after the inspectors were gone.

CO2 just makes more and bigger plants and lots more animals. Why is that bad?

Anytime someone says UN, it causes me to get all giggly.

32 posted on 11/17/2007 8:45:10 PM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: technomage; All
Sea levels have gone up by an average seven-hundredths of an inch per year since 1961

Okay, lets use their numbers: If sea levels have gone up .07 of an inch in 46 years, during which time the temp has supposedly gone up maybe 1 degree F, even if we have a 5 degree rise, that would add another 1/3 of an inch to sea levels?


Well yes, but use their numbers accurately...:^)

0.07 inch per year for 46 years is 3.22 inches

But I thought this sea level rise measurement was even more “nebulous” and under debate than the temperature numbers.

33 posted on 11/17/2007 8:47:46 PM PST by az_gila (AZ - need less democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: boop

Yeah...I thought 4 of the warmest years were in the 30’s? I guess the NASA corrections got left off the report because they did not fit the template. I wonder if they resurrected Mann;s hockey stick graph as well?


34 posted on 11/17/2007 9:19:57 PM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

35 posted on 11/17/2007 9:21:51 PM PST by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

“We have already committed the world to sea level rise,” the panel’s chairman, Rajendra Pachauri, said. But if the Greenland ice sheet melts, the scientists said, they could not predict by how many feet the seas will rise, drowning coastal cities......................................

“Quantified conservatively, the study indicates a net loss of roughly 51 cubic kilometers of ice per year from the entirety of the Greenland ice sheet. That’s enough to raise the average sea level worldwide about .13 millimeters per year. While that might not sound like much, consider that in the space of only a single lifetime, it’s nearly 1 centimeter of rise, and that’s only if we assume the rate of increase remains the same.”

Something does not copute here folks.......One global warming alarmist, the IPCC says coastal cities will be flooded, and http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/stories/greenland/ another global warming alramist says it will rise 1 cm in our lifetime, certainly not enough to flodd a damn thing.


36 posted on 11/17/2007 9:30:18 PM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

Greenland’s ice cap has thickened slightly in recent years despite wide predictions of a thaw triggered by global warming, a team of scientists said on Thursday.

The 9,842-feet thick ice cap is a key concern in debates about climate change because a total melt would raise world sea levels by about 7 meters. And a runaway thaw might slow the Gulf Stream that keeps the North Atlantic region warm.

But satellite measurements showed that more snowfall was falling and thickening the ice cap, especially at high altitudes, according to the report in the journal Science.

Glaciers at sea level have been retreating fast because of a warming climate, making many other scientists believe the entire ice cap was thinning.

“The overall ice thickness changes are ... approximately plus 1.9 inches a year or 21.26 inches over 11 years,” according to the experts at Norwegian, Russian and U.S. institutes led by Ola Johannessen at the Mohn Sverdrup center for Global Ocean Studies and Operational Oceanography in Norway.

Melting at the edges, thickening in the higher altitudes.....See folks, the edges give the great photo op ICEBERG calving and lonley polar bear pictures....The center, higher altitude, snowy stuff is boring and goes unnoticed, but it seem the result is the same, ice leaving along the edges, piling up in the center, but net net a wash....Another inconvenient truth they will hide from you. Greenland is losing 4/1000’s of it;s mass of ice each year, but the alarmists would tell you the pace of melting is quickening. Just another tactic designed to keep people from focusing on the overall picture.


37 posted on 11/17/2007 9:36:16 PM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The UN is polluting the airwaves with their hot air.

US out of UN, UN out of US bump.


38 posted on 11/17/2007 9:38:17 PM PST by cgbg (The fight has just begun against the bully (nanny) state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

The ice cap became so large over time (about 600,000 cubic miles (mi3) or 2.5 million cubic kilometers (km3)) because more snow fell than melted. .............this is Greenland folks, 2.5 million cubic kilometers of ice cap, of which the IPCC claims is melting at rate of 250 cubic kilometers prt year. At this rate the ice cap will be gone in 10,000 YEARS. Not in the next century as the Goracle would have us believe. This is the biggest scam ever perpetrated on the human race, and the populus is getting wise to the huckster, that is why they their predictions are getting louder and more dire. They know if they do not take charge soon, even the dim witted amonst us will realize the fraud.


39 posted on 11/17/2007 9:42:52 PM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Meanwhile Argentina is being rocked by record cold...


40 posted on 11/17/2007 10:40:09 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Recently someone was on the radio ... Beck? Saying that CO2 is only one molecule in a hundred thousand in the air, and that it would take some huge amount of emissions to increase that to two in a hundred thousand. Or was that two hundred thousand?

Does anybody know where any sources for this can be found?


41 posted on 11/18/2007 12:53:12 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf

~~ AGW™ ping~~


42 posted on 11/18/2007 6:04:45 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; All

Does anybody know if they have ever actually released the original study from which they are drawing these conclusions?


43 posted on 11/18/2007 6:08:24 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

Please see my post #43.


44 posted on 11/18/2007 6:09:08 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

Damn Monk you got everybody in there BTW I see Islamic rage boy LOL!

Is that Palensteian woman right there on bottom


45 posted on 11/18/2007 9:13:17 AM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

Yep.


46 posted on 11/18/2007 2:30:57 PM PST by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: boop
Somebody tell NASA. They just adjusted their numbers to say this is completely false.

The statement is correct for global temperatures. The NASA corrections were for U.S. temperatures.

47 posted on 11/19/2007 8:57:41 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Sun and global warming: a cosmic connection?
48 posted on 11/19/2007 8:59:17 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

See post 47.


49 posted on 11/19/2007 9:01:05 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
The report is from 2005 covering the years 1992-2003. You need to update this with Luthcke et al. 2006, "Recent Greenland Ice Mass Loss by Drainage System from Satellite Gravity Observations."

Final two sentences of this paper: "During the 1990s, the observed thinning at the margins and the growth inland were both expected responses to climate warming. Our new results suggest that the processes of significant ice depletion at the margins, through melting and glacier acceleration, are beginning to dominate the interior growth as climate warming has continued."

50 posted on 11/19/2007 9:07:31 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson