Thanks for ignoring the one candidate that would have answered all of your questions. Of course, that would have defeated the purpose of your article.
Well, if they had enough support, their campaigns wouldn't be faltering.
Whew this guy could be hillary, with his us against them attitude.
That's a bit disingenuous. The globalists are just as dedicated to their side as we are to ours. We can beat them on the facts and simple reality; I don't see the need to disparage them just because they're stupid--uh, I mean just because we disagree.
bookmark
“J.D. Hayworth lost his congressional seat in Arizona after taking a tough stance on the border.”
The GOP and White House did not back him at all! Rove treated him like dirt.
Perhaps the money trouble that Trancredo and Hunter are having suggests that maybe, just maybe, they don’t enjoy as much support as you think they do? I’ve always found that a war chest is the real gauge by which you can measure a candidates support. I’ve yet to see anyone fail to raise any significant amount of money and yet do well in politics.
Need bigger government, more spending, larger deficits, leave the heavy jobs to the Republicans.
“Why have the campaigns of Hunter and Tancredo faltered?”
Because they never should have run in the first place until they had better name recognition. Half the GOP wanna bees could still shop alone at any Walmart or shopping mall and not be recognized. It is too early in their careers to run for a big office - They need to do more to get more attention over the next 4 years then come back for another look. This is the problem - Too many bottomfeeders are sapping the energy of the front runners. If this gaggle of candidates continue to muddy the waters, we will not have a GOP consensus and Hillary will win hands down. (And pleeeeease don’t tell me Paul has all the answers. - He is the lowest of the bottomfeeders and he is not even a Republican - He is a libertarian.)