Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some House Backers of Thompson Are Starting to Lose the Faith
CQ POLITICS ^ | 19 November 2007 | Jonathan Allen, CQ Staff

Posted on 11/19/2007 10:22:45 AM PST by Alter Kaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last
To: Alter Kaker

It doesn’t matter who is voicing a few misgivings. They picked Fred, I think they should go ahead and back him.

This kind of whining and regrets, if genuine, is a little too self-serving.


121 posted on 11/19/2007 2:24:26 PM PST by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

....what a weak “Hit” piece.....


122 posted on 11/19/2007 2:55:16 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, Fred, Run. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

and betamax was a good video format...


123 posted on 11/19/2007 3:23:03 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

considering the professor has a left wing bias, it is a very limp wristed hit piece.


124 posted on 11/19/2007 3:25:13 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Greg F; Jim Robinson
LOL. I’d say banning people for posting things critical of Fred makes him a FRedHead! I think it’s a mistake to be partisan for a particular candidate in primaries, to that extent, when you run a site like Free Republic, but it’s his site.

**************

Courtesy ping.

125 posted on 11/19/2007 3:27:46 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
and betamax was a good video format...

LOL . . . I'm going to break it to you . . . but if you are looking for a conservative nominee then you may be making fun of your own aspirations, since Thompson and Tancredo are the other conservatives in the race besides Hunter and they are both looking like longshots as well. I say that giving Thompson the benefit of the doubt in regard to his basic conservatism on the issues of immigration and trade. Thompson's campaign may be in a "lull" as another poster put it, but I was worried about him as a candidate when he was freezing support for guys like Hunter before he announced, and my worries seem to be bearing out. I support Hunter because he is the best man in the country for the office of President, in my opinion. I can't think of another man I would rather have be President and it has been a long time since I felt that way about a candidate.

126 posted on 11/19/2007 3:41:57 PM PST by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: trisham; jimrob

I think you are right, I should have pinged JimRob on that. Thank you and apologies to Jim.


127 posted on 11/19/2007 3:43:29 PM PST by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: trisham; Jim Robinson

I think you are right, I should have pinged Jim Robinson on that. Thank you and apologies to Jim.


128 posted on 11/19/2007 3:44:39 PM PST by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

Bump! Agreed!


129 posted on 11/19/2007 4:04:44 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (AmericanInTokyo; Count THIS Freeper as solidly behind DUNCAN HUNTER 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Looks like he’s smelling something bad. A real cheerful, optimistic, attractive candidate. The perpetual hangdog expression is a real winner.


130 posted on 11/19/2007 5:26:53 PM PST by WestSylvanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
The latest gallup poll ended 11/14 so it did not have the NRLC endorsement in the numbers

Freeper discussion on the latest Gallup Poll
131 posted on 11/19/2007 6:39:45 PM PST by Fred (The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nilhilism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

True as a definition goes. You are correct. But, we could actually win the election and still have an opening for conservative agendas depending on the ticket: Mitt, Rudy , even John would have to pick a conservative to have a chance at holding the South. In reality, only Rudy could be the only guy to pull that off. John has tricked the BASE too long. Mitt is an OK guy, good on economics but national security: who knows? Rudy is at best a moderate, whatever that is. But, he could win. Hil would be in trouble in many blue and purple states and if Rudy picked a S.conser or W. conserv for the VP, he could edge her out. Anybody but a Dem for me, my friend.


132 posted on 11/19/2007 8:00:12 PM PST by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
"He has had one wife" You guys keep bringing that up. Do you have a problem with those of us who have been married more than once?

No problem per se. We just know that any little personal item will be meat for the grinder by the Democrats & lib-media especially when gay marriage comes up, as if they have a hoot n holler to do with one another, but there ya go. It will be used, valid or not, to lob a hypocrisy charge. Dems will do anything to win. We also know that a personal life example that is a bit better than the Clintons wouldn't hurt.

133 posted on 11/19/2007 9:42:37 PM PST by WOSG (Pro-life, pro-family, pro-freedom, pro-strong defense, pro-GWOT, pro-capitalism, pro-US-sovereignty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Maybe so, but not at the expense of conservatism.

Also I think Fred’s situation has been above reproach. Divorce is common now, and since there has been no sign of infidelity on Thompson’s part, he stands head and shoulders above the Clintons.

134 posted on 11/19/2007 9:58:48 PM PST by ejonesie22 (ROMNEY HOCKS! (hey, he's spent a lot of his own cash so far...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
So everyone who has been divorced is suspect and not fit for office.

Yes to the first part, and no to the second. It has to be considered as part of the overall package. A person does not get a pass from me for lying under oath - however I do believe in redemption.

I have a serious problem with folks that have multiple marriages. One divorce can be a result of bad judgement...multiple divorces indicate bad character.

135 posted on 11/20/2007 4:55:09 AM PST by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Actually I am. Fred is younger than Reagan at the sametime in this game and Reagan did quite well...

Oh come on. Ronald Reagan looked like Mitt Romney. Youthful and energetic. Nobody would have thought Ronald Reagan looked old. Horrible comparison if you want your point to be taken.


136 posted on 11/20/2007 5:00:42 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB
Ok, so when one is divorced they lied under oath. I can see that to some degree I guess. Indeed I did not lie about my oath, I took it in all seriousness. My ex wife was the one with the issues after the fact, so I was left with limited choices. I don’t feel like I lied at all.

I wanted to explore this because of the topic (Fred) and the fact that it has never been said he cheated on his ex wife. So the divorce seems to be “legit” from a fidelity stand point (ie not the cause). He also seems quite happy and satisfied in his current marriage and blessed with two children

So I want to avoid the implication that Fred cheated and also the implication that divorcees are not fit for office.

Remember, Reagan too was twice married, and he worked out pretty could for our conservative cause. Not comparing the men but the circumstance.

137 posted on 11/20/2007 6:17:58 AM PST by ejonesie22 (ROMNEY HOCKS! (hey, he's spent a lot of his own cash so far...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I think it is a solid comparison. Both men were in the same age group, both actors with presence and ability. Maybe Fred should get some Mitt hair, will that help? I often times find hair styles as the single most determining factor in my candidate.

Of course that would make him like Mitt as well, though only Fred’s hair would be fake...


138 posted on 11/20/2007 6:23:53 AM PST by ejonesie22 (ROMNEY HOCKS! (hey, he's spent a lot of his own cash so far...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Sun; 8mmMauser; Dante3; wagglebee

Ping. As if FV’s the only person hvg doubts about Fred. These are elected officials! The smearization of FV is officially OVER.


139 posted on 11/20/2007 8:00:26 AM PST by floriduh voter (Terri Schindler Schiavo unwillingly gave her life to become a debate question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

bttt. You are on the right track. No flip flopping in your politics.


140 posted on 11/20/2007 8:02:59 AM PST by floriduh voter (Terri Schindler Schiavo unwillingly gave her life to become a debate question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson