Skip to comments.Ron Paul Courts 9-11 Troofers on Alex Jones Show...Again (Paging Ministry of Silly Explanations)
Posted on 11/21/2007 9:31:52 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
Apparently, America's greatest patriot was on Loonwaffle/Trooferville's favorite radio show today with the King Nutbar himself, although I'm not sure if anyone grabbed audio.
If you want to listen to the rebroadcast stream, go here. I don't feel like it. Have fun.
Aren't most truthers democrats, though? The rest are probably not even from the USA.
The usual “Hate the Jews” BS. Happens about every 80 years.
Paul is just “old dogging it”. He has been a protest candidate forever. He does not deny anything, even his Paul Newsletter stuff. Ever noticed that Paul’s supporters are the one’s denying and defending their own platforms. The ones they believe that Paul supports.
The more of these “interviews” he does, the more he gets his minions to defend him. As an “old dog”, he is just keeping quiet, spending the money, and letting the “protest candidates” do his protesting and oftentimes making fools of themselves. All the while knowing full well he has no chance, won’t run again, and can go out a little more loudly than he thought.
Cue the Ministry of Silly Explanations...known as MiniSilEx for short. Orwell would be proud.
Anyone who thinks the 9/11 Commission report represents the “truth” is poorly informed. Pools of molten steel, explosions in the basements, count-downs for the demolition of WTC7 broadcast over police radio, and a complete failure to investigate the money trail are not the realm of Democrats and aliens; they are things that people interested in a Free Republic ought to know about.
“The Jawa Report”
Hehehe....sand people, LOL!
They walk among us.
The troof is out there!
Because I love watching movies and such, I was even willing to believe some of what was claimed by truthers was possible.
All I wanted was something like reasonable evidence and all I ever got was dishonesty, "knowing" comments and extremely convoluted counter-interpretations of the obvious.
Grappling with the claims on a point-by-point basis helped me realize that the 911 truth movement is a complete, money-making scam.
The 911 truth movement is really just another religious cult.
Paul is gonna get Hitleroid elected.
Do you also believe Hunter S. Thompson was assassinated because he was about to 1) expose a child-molesting ring of Washington insiders that gathered at Bohemian Grove and/or 2) was preparing to write about WTC building #7 and that "they" made it look like an accident, regardless of the fact that Thompson has a history of reckless wielding of firearms a la Phil Spector? Alex Jones believes that too.
Alex Jones lists this as his job on his IRS form: The Man Who Will Believe You When Nobody Else Will No Matter How Implausible Your Story. (Just kidding, he probably doesn't even pay taxes. At least, that's what I heard...somewhere...and I believe it!) </sarcasm>
My understanding is that Ron Paul has no interest in running as a third party. I’m sure that his “giving up” after he loses the nomination won’t sit well with his legion of net.followers, though, so who knows.
As a physics major, I take a scientific approach, not a faith-based approach. The problem, of course, is that I have to approach the problem based on “evidence” from secondary sources.
But consider this “fact sheet” from the National Institute of Standards:
“7a. How could the steel have melted if the fires in the WTC towers werent hot enough to do so?
7b. Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit and Underwriters Laboratories (UL) certified the steel in the WTC towers to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit for six hours, how could fires have impacted the steel enough to bring down the WTC towers?
“In no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires. The melting point of steel is about 1,500 degrees Celsius (2,800 degrees Fahrenheit). Normal building fires and hydrocarbon (e.g., jet fuel) fires generate temperatures up to about 1,100 degrees Celsius (2,000 degrees Fahrenheit). NIST reported maximum upper layer air temperatures of about 1,000 degrees Celsius (1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) in the WTC towers (for example, see NCSTAR 1, Figure 6-36).
“However, when bare steel reaches temperatures of 1,000 degrees Celsius, it softens and its strength reduces to roughly 10 percent of its room temperature value. Steel that is unprotected (e.g., if the fireproofing is dislodged) can reach the air temperature within the time period that the fires burned within the towers. Thus, yielding and buckling of the steel members (floor trusses, beams, and both core and exterior columns) with missing fireproofing were expected under the fire intensity and duration determined by NIST for the WTC towers.”
Is it not obvious from this source (http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm) that (1) the existence of molten steel is not disputed and (2) no attempt whatsover is offered to explain how it got there, and indeed, NIST agrees that it didn’t come from the fires? The physics professor who publicly offered a plausible hypothesis for this (thermite) was then forced out of BYU.
There are many other anomalies. San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown publicly blurted out that he was advised not to fly that day; enterprising SF Chronicle reporters attempted to track down the source of the warning and got nowhere. On Youtube, one can hear Guiliani saying, on 9/11/01, that he received a warning that the Twin Towers were going to come down before they did; it is a VCR recording of him speaking, over the phone, to Peter Jennings (if I recall correctly). There seems to be no dispute that workers attempting to remove gold below the site found that someone else had gotten there first, perhaps abandoning the effort before completion, yet the site was very highly guarded. On Youtube, you can see several people who purport to be workers at WTC testifying to explosions in the basement before the Towers came down.
There are many, many anomalies that any competent investigation would address, yet none do. If one bothers to take the considerable amount of time it takes to learn the details, the overall impression becomes more and more disturbing. It is only the ignorant that regard the 9/11 Commission report as providing any degree of closure on the subject.
Of course, there are many “truthers” who are credulous idiots, and their idiotic theories tend to cast discredit upon those who raise legitimate questions.
One does not have to be a Left-wing Bush-hating fanatic to raise these questions. It is possible that a good President, upon discovering that criminal elements associated with intelligence agencies knew in advance about a terrorist plan to strike the Towers and profited by it would decide that it was better to punish the perpetrators privately. I would disagree with that determination, and see no evidence that any such punishments occurred, but my approach is merely to note the anomalies, and believe further investigation is warranted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.