[Lead Moderator]

So, we did it to ourselves? If you believe that, YOU ARE A NUT.

[Calvinist_Dark_Lord]

So, we did it to ourselves? If you believe that, YOU ARE A NUT.

Ironically, Ron Paul would probably tell him the same thing that you just told him.

[Hornitos]

So, we did it to ourselves? If you believe that, YOU ARE A NUT.

It's hard to fathom a mind which tries to construct some elaborate plot to justify a preconceived conclusion: "Some nefarious plotters secretly and carefully planted explosives all over 3 buildings, and sent in a remote-controlled papier mache airplane to make it all look like Middle Eastern terrorists had done it, all because Halliburton had cornered the market in hand-loomed rugs!"

As if there aren't any hateful and deranged nuts out there wanting to fly airplanes into our buildings, if they can. As if they view American leaders as no better than al Qaeda terrorists. As if their opinions on the physcial science of airplanes crashing into and bringing down towers are all infallable, and everyone else are dunces for failing to see how much smarter they are and how terrible American leadership and self-governance is.

[Iconoclast2]

There is ample evidence that we were attacked by Muslim terrorists; foreign and domestic intelligence agencies detected planning activities and issued vague warnings. But there is also considerable evidence that those who attacked us did more than just fly the planes into the Towers. By all appearances, additional steps were taken, in advance, on the ground, to result in the total destruction of WTC1, 2 and 7. I see no other explanation for the pools of molten steel, the existence of which would help explain why two towers that were engineered to survive almost exactly such a strike did not do so. Who took the additional steps is unknown. Leftists would like to believe Bush et al. were involved, and there are nuts all over ranting about that, but the evidence I think is worth paying attention to is the physics that doesn’t add up.