Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UC Researchers Analyze Domestic Violence Deaths in Hamilton County
Univarsity of Cincinnati ^ | 11/7/2007 | Dawn Fuller

Posted on 11/23/2007 8:59:01 AM PST by PieroC

A new report reviews the domestic violence deaths of 48 people and holds recommendations aimed at preventing future tragedies.

Findings on Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Homicide (Hamilton County, Ohio)

Separated 77 percent
Substance abuse 68 percent
Increase in frequency of abuse 66 percent
Gun involved 66 percent
Criminal history 63 percent
Stalking 53 percent
Prior domestic violence charge 48 percent
Threats to kill 46 percent
Prior history child abuse 41 percent
Threats of suicide 41 percent
Perpetrator mental illness 33 percent
Perpetrator bought a weapon 33 percent
Property damage 33 percent
Threats with weapons 32 percent
Previous serious injury 28 percent
Sexual assault 24 percent
Strangulation 22 percent
Violated protection order 20 percent
Sadistic/hostage acts 20 percent
Animal abuse 5 percent


(Excerpt) Read more at uc.edu ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cincinnati; crime; study; university
This list of "Risk Factors" alone can't prevent the next deadly violence. I beg you to support the proposed recommendations, to study, assess, and distribuite a more complete list of percentages.
1 posted on 11/23/2007 8:59:03 AM PST by PieroC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PieroC

I notice they don’t separate married and not married.


2 posted on 11/23/2007 9:03:55 AM PST by steve8714 (The last actor elected POTUS turned out OK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieroC

did they do a break down by gender?


3 posted on 11/23/2007 9:06:20 AM PST by Keith Brown (Among the other evils being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised Machiavelli.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieroC

Domestic violence takes this path:

1. Name calling,
2. Pushing, shoving, physical constraint (held against will)
3. Slapping
4. Hitting with closed fist
5. Hitting with a weapon
6. Homicide

Perpetrators cannot promise their domestic violence tendencies away — can’t wish them away — almost never are able to change themselves — spouse can’t change them either. Perpetrators need to commit to change by seeing a professional, unbiased third party who can help them unbundle the tendrils of anger that have become tied up in knots within their own wounded psyches.

Notice though that the history of having grown up in violence is 41% — that means that 59% of the kiddos who grow up in violent homes DO NOT become perpetrators. Violent homes are not necessarily the predictors of future domestic violence but it sure needs to be dredged up from the bottom memories and resolved.

Domestic violence is a choatic life for a child. Children deserve better — like a happy little life where mommy and daddy aren’t at war with each other, their children, and the world outside their front door.


4 posted on 11/23/2007 9:13:10 AM PST by janereinheimer ((I can do all things through Him who strengthens me.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith Brown
In the body of the article it is stated 97% female victims.
5 posted on 11/23/2007 9:13:11 AM PST by PieroC (pieroc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PieroC

One thing everyone shys away from is percentages of race. They need to look at Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Middle Easterners, etc. The more they shy away from this, they’ll never address the causes.


6 posted on 11/23/2007 9:14:55 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

Do you think they want to address the causes or just studying them?


7 posted on 11/23/2007 9:19:20 AM PST by PieroC (pieroc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PieroC

Shouldn’t it be part of the study though? If you don’t look at everything then the study is useless.


8 posted on 11/23/2007 9:21:55 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RC2
I think I have the same feeling.
9 posted on 11/23/2007 9:24:45 AM PST by PieroC (pieroc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer

This is a good list and everyone should read it, I think. I also agree that women should act like hitters cannot change. It’s hard for me to imagine choosing to live with a hitter.

In fact, many folks that live with hitters don’t seem to think like me. For one thing, they think that they have some control and can “handle” the situation. For another, some folks don’t have the same horror of violence that I do. Here is my additional list of rules for those folks.

Don’t even think about staying with a hitter if you can’t walk away from an argument with them. If a hitter is drinking, leave them alone. If a hitter is shouting or overreacting to frustration, leave them alone.

If you live with a hitter, you must have a place to go when there is a problem. Friends and relatives that will take you any time of day or night and in any condition of sobriety are the best ways to go. They will probably have to take your kids and other dependents, too. Overnight is good enough, most of the time. If you need a longer-term placement, your relationship is beyond saving.

Your partner needs to give permission in the presence of others for you to leave at will. Hitters are frequently weird on control of their significant others.

If you live with a hitter, you have to be ready to tell the truth about your own life. You can’t lie, wear sunglasses inside, protect you abuser, etc.

The reason I mention all this is that hitters often live in relationships with partners that stay despite behavior that we wouldn’t put up with. They are entitled to their choices, but a serious reality check can help a little sometimes.

Women often hit, by the way. It’s not just men. Women hit children and the elderly somewhat more often than men, I’m told. They aren’t nearly as lethal as men in spousal (or boyfriend/girlfriend) conflicts, however.


10 posted on 11/23/2007 9:57:25 AM PST by VaFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VaFarmer
Hi VaFarmer,

It would be very useful to find out how many of the victims had an Italian brother.

11 posted on 11/23/2007 10:12:17 AM PST by PieroC (pieroc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PieroC

I find it very interesting to note that infidelity is not listed. I guess one of the basic tenets of marriage, fidelity, is nothing more than incidental in our society.


12 posted on 11/23/2007 10:29:06 AM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyman
I find it very interesting to note that infidelity is not listed.

The report is totally bogus. It's sole purpose is to blame men, strip constitutional rights from the legal process, ban guns and funnel millions of dollars to women's study majors holding themselves out as "domestic violence workers."

13 posted on 11/23/2007 10:34:11 AM PST by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer

Notice though that the history of having grown up in violence is 41% — that means that 59% of the kiddos who grow up in violent homes DO NOT become perpetrators.
_____________

What you need to know is how many “domestic partners” grew up in violent households, and how many people whow grew up in violent households become abusers. What the stat says is that 59% of abusers did not come from violent households - but it could be that 100% of men from violent households do turn out to be abusers. Not enough infor here to tell.


14 posted on 11/23/2007 10:42:42 AM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer
Notice though that the history of having grown up in violence is 41% — that means that 59% of the kiddos who grow up in violent homes DO NOT become perpetrators.

Um, no it doesn't. It means that the other 59% in this study did not come from violent homes.

15 posted on 11/23/2007 11:54:27 AM PST by Valpal1 (Blame the loss of civility on criminals and terrorists, not the cops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: janereinheimer
What this really means is that if there is a situation in which the couple is recently separated and there is a history of substance abuse and prior domestic assault and that the man has made threats to kill the woman.....

Then she better buy a gun and start training with it, because the odds are very high that he will in fact attempt to kill her and may very well succeed if she relies soley on the courts and the police to protect her.

16 posted on 11/23/2007 12:02:23 PM PST by Valpal1 (Blame the loss of civility on criminals and terrorists, not the cops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson