Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan : Repeat of 1971?
Mainstream weekly,India ^ | 25 November 2007 | Sreedhar

Posted on 11/27/2007 4:12:29 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Pakistan : Repeat of 1971? Sunday 25 November 2007, by Sreedhar

Since the declaration of Emergency on November 3, the developments in Pakistan indicate that the country is slowly drifting into a civil war. General Musharraf’s rule is being opposed by two groups—Jehadis on the one hand and defunct political parties and activists of civil society on the other. The latest reports indicate there is even an under- ground movement opposing General Musharraf. According to unconfirmed reports, the Jehadis have captured large parts of the Swat area and Waziristan and they are moving in two directions—some are moving towards Peshawar and some others towards Islamabad. The initial reports indicate that the police and Pakistani paramilitary forces, numbering over 900 in these areas, have surrendered to the Tehreek Nafaz-e-Shariet Muhammadi (the Movement for Enforcement of Islamic Laws) with their weapons.

According to Western intelligence assessments over the past few years, the Pakistani armed forces are vertically split into pro- and anti-Jehadi forces. According to some assessments, around 40 to 50 per cent of the armed forces are sympathetic to the Jehadi cause and support them. The pro-Jehadi armed forces argue that they have fought along with them against the Red Army during the 1980s and facilitated their training in the subsequent years. Over the years, these Jehadis have become part and parcel of the Pakistan establishment. In addition, this more than two decades long association between the armed forces and Jehadis makes it clear that each support the other in their cause like the Jehadis facilitating Pakistan’s clandestine nuclear proliferation. With a majority of Jehadis being locals, now the rank and file of the armed forces are also asking the question: why should they fight against their brethren?

Meanwhile there is a tussle between the young lawyers of the Pakistan Bar Council and Benazir Bhutto to lead protests against General Musharraf from next week onwards. There is no trust among many young Pakistanis about Benazir’s credibility. She is being seen as a politician who colluded with General Musharraf and managed to come back to Pakistan.

In this backdrop, the immediate question that is being debated among various Pakistani friends is: what will be the future of the Pakistani polity? It is no longer being described as a failing state or failed state or withering state. They perceive the present developments as the beginning of the end of Pakistan. In this context one can visualise four scenarios.

THE first could be that General Musharraf will continue to rule Pakistan for some more time to come with a rag-tag coalition like Hamid Karzai is doing in next-door Afghanistan. Many observers feel that people like Benazir Bhutto may join the government any time. Some reports coming from Dubai indicate that Benazir has been offered the post of Prime Minister in the new dispensation by General Musharraf and she accepted it. At this stage one is not too sure how long such an arrangement can continue. Besides, seeing the opposition to General Musharraf which is increasing by the day, the ambitious Benazir may be looking for greener pastures and may even try to settle scores with the Pakistani Army. Some observers even feel she will ditch General Musharraf at at a time opportune to her and only the timing is not known.

The second scenario could be that the present breakdown of law and order will force some other General to step in and replace General Musharraf. Unconfirmed reports coming from Pakistan indicate that General Musharraf is under house arrest (!) and the Corps Commanders are debating about the modalities to be followed to change the head at the top. These reports gained further credence when the US State Department announced that they are not keeping all their options on one person—General Musharraf—alone.

Since most of Pakistan’s donor countries have expressed their displeasure about the declaration of Emergency, in the next few weeks the external aid inflow into Pakistan will considerably slow down. The Pakistani economy is sustaining itself during the past five years on external aid only. The present estimates point out that between 2001 and 2006 around $ 20 billion of aid had come to Pakistan. Thus if the aid inflow stops, the Pakistani economy would collapse. Already the Karachi stock market index is tumbling down indicating that there is a crisis in the Pakistani economy.

All this necessitates some quick action by the Pakistani armed forces, who are at the helm of affairs now, to turn the tide against these negative trends.

The third scenario could be that General Musharraf will hold elections as scheduled in January 2008 and restore democratic rule in the country. Already there are reports in the media saying that the Emergency is for two months only and elections will take place in January 2008.

However, this scenario seems to be highly unlikely for two reasons. At one level, in spite of pressure from allies like the US asking General Musharraf to give up his office as Chief of the Army Staff and allow the elections, General Musharraf is aware that he is indispensable to the United States in the latter’s war on terrorism. Therefore, whatever may be the friendly advises from the US, his support in Washington D.C. will not come down. At another level General Musharraf feels that the political vacuum created by him in the country and the influence enjoyed by the Jehadis will continue for some more time. Therefore, by doing a balancing act by pleasing the Jehadis and giving some incentives to people like Benazir, he can survive.

The last scenario could be that different socio-political forces in Pakistan pull the country in different directions. Already the Taliban-Al-Qaeda combine rule most of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and parts of NWFP. Many observers who visited these areas during the past few weeks say that these areas have declared themselves as independent from Islamabad. A Taliban type of rule is in vogue in these areas. In many government offices in the Jehadi occupied areas, the Pakistani National Flag has been pulled down and replaced by black and white flags reminiscent of Taliban-type of rule. A local private FM radio in the Swat area started announcing the areas captured by Jehadis from November 5 onwards.

There are reports saying that even the Pakistani Army, deputed by Islamabad to gain control of the area and establish its authority, has surrendered to the local tribal leaders loyal to the Taliban-Al-Qaeda.

In this dicey situation, the unfolding events indicate that two provinces, Baluchistan and NWFP, are tilting towards separation from Pakistan. In the past both these provinces felt that they are being exploited by the Punjabi dominated Pakistanis. Over the years the world has witnessed the demand for separation from Pakistan from these two provinces. In the past, the demand for the creation of Pakhtoonistan by Pashtuns and separate Baluchistan by the Baluchis (by people like the Khan of Kalat) was crushed by brute force. Now all these sub-ethnic forces are ganging up together again and are fighting against the Pakistani state. The coming months will show whether Pakistan is going to experience another 1971 type of situation.

THE territorial integrity of Pakistan is of immedi-ate concern to two major powers—the US and China and to the immediate neighbours of Pakistan. The US considers Pakistan as a front-line state in its war against terrorism. In fact the US has stationed more than 25,000 troops in Pakistan permanently. The US strategic community is divided over the division of Pakistan as a last resort in its war against terrorism. Some feel that a divided Pakistan will not be able to provide safe havens to the Jehadis. And managing smaller states would be much easier in the emerging geo-political order.

The Chinese consider that Pakistan provides an important outlet for them to reach the Indian Ocean. Their investment in the Gwadar port in Baluchistan is one example. The thriving bilateral trade by road via the Karakoram highway connecting both the countries is another example of the Chinese stakes in Pakistan. Till now the Chinese have refused to comment on the unfolding civil war like situation in Pakistan.

Many observers feel that neither of these two allies of Pakistan has any control over the events happening in Pakistan.

From the Indian perspective, the develop-ments in Pakistan are unfortunate and where they will lead to is being debated by the mandarins in the South Block. If the disintegra-tion of Pakistan becomes inevitable, this civil war among the new nation-states will continue for some more years to come. In this new situation what will be the position of Jehadis operating in J&K? In the new situation the Jehadis cannot expect any support from the Pakistani establishment as in the past.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1971; bangladesh; china; india; pakistan

1 posted on 11/27/2007 4:12:31 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Do you think this could have a positive angle for India and the West?

If the ideological factions in Pakistan could also be split geographically, the most troublesome might become more easy to deal with.


2 posted on 11/27/2007 5:00:00 AM PST by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people. Socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

If any split happens in Pakistan-it will likely happen via a civil war-the Balochs,the Pashtuns & even the Sindhis would probably want a state of their own.The problem in all this is that most,if not all would want a piece or 2 from Pakistan’s crown jewels-it’s Nukes.That’s where the real Jihadi-Nuke threat lies-as long as Pakistan & it’s army remains united,there is little chance of a Jihadi getting its hands on a nuke.


3 posted on 11/27/2007 6:27:10 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
as long as Pakistan & it’s army remains united,there is little chance of a Jihadi getting its hands on a nuke.

According to the article there is a finite probability that it won't. What then?

I hope we have a series of special forces ops ready to take those weapons out now.

4 posted on 11/27/2007 6:50:15 AM PST by Carry_Okie (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

What then??Hmm,well pray or hope to try & get a place on the International Space Station.

The Special Forces option is not practical given that Pakistan’s N-assets are dispersed & well guarded.Other than launching an allout first strike,there is little the outside world can do .


5 posted on 11/27/2007 6:53:32 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The Special Forces option is not practical given that Pakistan’s N-assets are dispersed & well guarded.Other than launching an allout first strike,there is little the outside world can do.

A joint U.S., Indian, Israeli strike might be successful. Such options are always a gamble, but the alternative would be most frightening.

Simply burying the weapons would only push the problem down the road, so getting them out would be the biggest problem I think. A B-2 strike of each storage area with MOABs or a few dozen JDAMS could open the door to a special forces insertion, or even a larger airborne drop. How will the Muslim population of India react to a Paki civil war?

6 posted on 11/27/2007 7:11:07 AM PST by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people. Socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy; RedStateRocker; gonzo; DeaconBenjamin; indcons; sukhoi-30mki; Eyes Unclouded; ECM; ...
Pakistan ۋﮧ۱م

FReepmail if you want on or off
7 posted on 11/27/2007 7:43:23 AM PST by G8 Diplomat (Creatures are divided into 6 kingdoms: Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Monera, Protista, & Saudi Arabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Any “operation involving ground forces would end up being very bloody-Does the US or even India have the heart for that now??The B-2 JDAM scenario would be successful if you have the best possible intell,along with surprise-which in practise becomes a first strike(non-nuclear though).

It would have made sense,if Pakistan had “frozen” it’s nuclear/missile developments since Sept-11th.But it hasn’t-There were reports in 2002/03 that they had upped production of fissile material considerably & have contracted for new reactors with China.Don’t expect all these to remain at the same places.At the same time,building new submarines as well as new cruise missiles-these open up whole new dimensions.

And lastly,if the US or anyone were to strike if Pakistan remained intact-how would China react to all this??Striking after it blows up-won’t serve much real purpose.

If you ask me,a few folks in India who have some governmental info on Pakistan say that nobody(India/US) really knows what to do in Pakistan-the country appears far too screwed up.

About Indian muslims-as far as past wars go,they’ve stayed quiet & ‘backed’ India.TIf Pakistan starts burning,here will likely be a considerable increase in terrorist acts in India-either by Pakistani groups or their Indian counterparts.But the vast majority of Muslims would probably remain quiet-they know they will get slaughtered if they try anything else.


8 posted on 11/27/2007 8:09:34 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; SampleMan
If at all we should solely concentrate on taking out the nukes and leave all other issues about Pakistan aside (which is what we should be doing right now), both India, Israel and US should be pooling in their intelligence and expertise on Pakistani nukes. We need to collaborate on intelligence to see what each side has along with the latest developments. If the three countries would pool their intelligence and expertise, that would likely give us some best possible options we could explore to neutralize their nuclear weapons.

Should things spirall out of control in Pakistan we would be facing such a scenario. If at all we should take a preemptive step now, it would have to be very quite and covert. No government would be bold enough to launch an overt preemptive military strikes at the risk of a full scale nuclear war, even if at all it is found to be the most effective and failsafe option.

The new subs and cruise missile have just been inducted and it would be very surprising if Pakistan has areadly managed to mate their warheads with Cruise missiles and SLBMs. Their arsenal size isnt really all that big. Hence their whole doctrine relies on first strike. Should India or US conduct a massive first strike (with precise intel) their arsenal may not survive to be able to launch an effective second strike.

If US and India are directly involved I would expect minimum Chinese involvement beyond some provocative troop movement and naval activity in the IO. If Pakistan collapses and US-India go after the nukes there would be little for China to achieve to get militarily involved. Even China’s bigger concern would be the nukes falling in the hands of Uighur Islamic militants.

9 posted on 11/27/2007 3:31:00 PM PST by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson