Skip to comments.
Giuliani billed obscure agencies for trips
Politico ^
| 112807
| By: Ben Smith
Posted on 11/28/2007 11:56:43 AM PST by Fred
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 last
To: Ramius
Question for First Lady Judy: When is it OK to cheat on your husband? Is it when you both know it’s over or when you decide you want it to be over?
81
posted on
11/28/2007 6:21:06 PM PST
by
claudiustg
(You know it. I know it.)
To: Condor51
The smucks are also paying for Judi’s parents homes in Hazleton and Florida.
82
posted on
11/28/2007 6:24:02 PM PST
by
angcat
("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
To: Ramius
#1. No, its not OK. Does it disqualify him from the Presidency? No. I dont really care that much. Its a negative, but a small one.
I'll admit, I'm old and old fashioned and I believe character counts and that if you can't stay faithful to a sacred oath you took, you probably aren't trustworthy enough to take an oath that gets you the keys to the White House. Clinton, Kennedy, FDR, etc., all proved that.
#2. I dont quite accept the premise. Need more info. I dont see that anything was all that hidden, and none of the charges seem all that out of line.
If they weren't out of line, then why are Giuliani's aides unable to explain why the expenses were billed to offices that had nothing to do with his security?
If you say that it was just some idiot on Giuliani's staff that made huge mistakes over and over, then would you want a man in the White House who is capable of hiring such idiots?
To be honest though, I think you should file some requests using New York's Freedom of Information laws to get the records and judge for yourself, because I think that is the only way you will come to the same conclusion that many of us already have.
To: af_vet_rr
I’m not going to get to pick who’s on the ticket. That is decided long before I vote for anybody. So for me to get all lathered up over any candidate at this point is pretty much a waste of energy.
But this is looking to come down between Hillary and ___? Who? I don’t know. I like most of our candidates to a greater or lesser degree. I have the least issues with Thompson. Maybe it’ll be him. I have a few issues with Giuliani... But I have FAR bigger issues with Hillary.
I don’t know who I’m voting for yet. But it won’t be Hillary, as FR seems to prefer.
Rudy has 2nd amendment squishyness, admittedly, but I don’t think Rudy will take my guns. I know for sure that Hillary will. Most here on FR seem to be OK with that. I can’t explain that.
84
posted on
11/28/2007 8:33:03 PM PST
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Williams
“Nothing in the article says he was not entitled to security when he travelled. The charges were for his security detail, not his personal expenses”
But the charges were hidden, tucked away in unrelated agencies. That’s what’s raised the red flags here.
85
posted on
11/28/2007 9:20:06 PM PST
by
COgamer
To: Parley Baer
> Even so he is better than anything the dimocRATS have to offer.
Yes, and death by lethal injection is better than death by fire. So?
86
posted on
11/30/2007 8:38:44 AM PST
by
VictoryGal
(Never give up, never surrender!)
To: Parley Baer
He holds the same positions on the issues as Hillary does. In what way is Rudy better?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson