Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shopper wins toilet paper tax case against Kmart
Pittsburgh Post-Gzette ^ | November 30, 2007 | Patricia Sabatini

Posted on 11/30/2007 5:04:57 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia

Murrysville resident Mary Bach has won her small claims suit against Kmart for improperly charging her state sales tax on toilet tissue.

District Judge Jeffrey Herbst yesterday ordered Kmart to pay $100 in damages plus $59.50 in court costs.

The longtime consumer advocate sued in September after being charged 28 cents tax on a $3.99, 12-pack of Angel Soft toilet tissue on two separate occasions at the Kmart store on Mall Boulevard in Monroeville.

Although most paper goods are taxable in Pennsylvania, toilet tissue is exempt.

"I'm delighted," Mrs. Bach said yesterday shortly after the judge's ruling.

Kmart, which was represented by the Pittsburgh office of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, will not appeal the ruling, Kmart spokeswoman Kim Freely said.

(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: kmart; pa; taxes; toiletpaper

1 posted on 11/30/2007 5:04:59 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Well, that should wipe the slate clean.......


2 posted on 11/30/2007 5:06:05 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

“Kmart, which was represented by the Pittsburgh office of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, will not appeal the ruling, Kmart spokeswoman Kim Freely said.”

It’s unbelievable that someone in their corporate accounting department didn’t take the time to look up the sales tax exemptions in PA and let it proceed to trial. His or her head is probably rolling right now.


3 posted on 11/30/2007 5:06:39 AM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

She’s on a roll


4 posted on 11/30/2007 5:08:40 AM PST by Constitution Day (Everything was fine until membership lost its privileges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

In our next episode, Mary Bach fights taxes on Uranus.


5 posted on 11/30/2007 5:10:45 AM PST by Democracy In Iraq (When a soldier dies, a protester gloats, a family cries, an Iraqi votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Kmart..... Wiping up the rear.


6 posted on 11/30/2007 5:10:50 AM PST by Quick Shot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

The jokes will write themselves...


7 posted on 11/30/2007 5:16:56 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (Is human activity causing the warming trend on Mars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

At one square per “event”, that 12-pack should last her the rest of her life.


8 posted on 11/30/2007 5:18:15 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Scrape the bottom, vote for Rodham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
It’s unbelievable that someone in their corporate accounting department didn’t take the time to look up the sales tax exemptions in PA and let it proceed to trial. His or her head is probably rolling right now.

If you've been to a KMart lately you will probably wonder how they get their key in the door. I'm not a huge Wal Mart fan but KMart is a shambles.

9 posted on 11/30/2007 5:21:24 AM PST by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Rats...you beat me to the Sheryl Crow reference...


10 posted on 11/30/2007 5:21:24 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (www.FantasyCollegeBlitz.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Well at least she doesn’t have to get her panties in a bunch.


11 posted on 11/30/2007 5:21:25 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (This post sold by weight, not volume. Content may have settled during shipment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Your tag line seems to apply to this post.

Regards


12 posted on 11/30/2007 5:22:31 AM PST by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.. (A "Concerned Citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: relictele

“If you’ve been to a KMart lately you will probably wonder how they get their key in the door. I’m not a huge Wal Mart fan but KMart is a shambles.”

Our local KMart is definitely a disaster. We have a Super Walmart and Target that are only a couple of miles away. Both the Walmart and the Target are huge, clean and cheap. The KMart has things sitting in the aisles, unfriendly help and higher prices!

I’m shocked the store is still open. I can only imagine it’s because the Sears merger was able to pump more cash into it. However, it doesn’t like they’re doing anything to compete...which is why KMart got in trouble to begin with.


13 posted on 11/30/2007 5:24:14 AM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ARE SOLE

I guess I’ll have to change my tag line!


14 posted on 11/30/2007 5:25:07 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Wipe the bottom, vote for Rodham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All

Whew...at least TP will be cheaper for the Pitt fans heading to WVU for the game this weekend


15 posted on 11/30/2007 5:25:14 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (www.FantasyCollegeBlitz.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Luckily it was only a small claims case, where a plaintiff cannot be represented by an attorney. Guess those lawyers will have to 2-ply their trade elsewhere.


16 posted on 11/30/2007 5:27:04 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (This post sold by weight, not volume. Content may have settled during shipment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
after being charged 28 cents tax on a $3.99, 12-pack of Angel Soft toilet tissue

I find you get treated better when your Charmin 

17 posted on 11/30/2007 5:33:47 AM PST by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
It’s unbelievable that someone in their corporate accounting department didn’t take the time to look up the sales tax exemptions in PA and let it proceed to trial.

It's a computer systems error. A human has to tell the computer what to charge tax on and what to exempt.

KMart was being sued for not correcting their error.

18 posted on 11/30/2007 5:38:56 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ...

ping


19 posted on 11/30/2007 5:39:41 AM PST by Tribune7 (Dems want to rob from the poor to give to the rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
I wanna know where the damage is

for $.28 she rates $160?

.28 is not exactly damage.

20 posted on 11/30/2007 5:46:15 AM PST by HeartlandOfAmerica (The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

SO this lady spends months of her life to complain
about $.58. Get a life.


21 posted on 11/30/2007 5:46:34 AM PST by mtairycitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mtairycitizen
...SO this lady spends months of her life to complain about $.58. Get a life....

No, she spent months in order to help her fellow citizens.

K-mart and others will take notice and hopefully clean up their act.

They've been put on notice that citizens are tired of being ripped off. Even if it's only $.58.

Good on her!

22 posted on 11/30/2007 5:50:32 AM PST by FReepaholic (This tagline could indicate global warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

“It’s a computer systems error. A human has to tell the computer what to charge tax on and what to exempt.”

That would still be someone’s responsibility to correct. And it seems a simple thing to, before allowing it to go to trial, to make sure the computer is charging items correctly.


23 posted on 11/30/2007 5:53:02 AM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom

Ping...


24 posted on 11/30/2007 5:57:22 AM PST by deport (>>>--Iowa Caucuses .. 33days and counting--<<< [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

Lawyers are odd birds. I was in a copyright lawsuit with a major manufacturer of collectible cr@p over something I wrote 25 years ago that magically turned up as part of something they were selling. They could have written me a check for four figures the day I first phoned them, said “sorry, we messed up” and I would have been happy. Instead, they spent probably tens of thousands on depositions, lawyers, etc. and in the end, paid me about what I would have taken in the first place.


25 posted on 11/30/2007 6:03:26 AM PST by 50sDad (Liberals: Never Happy, Never Grateful, Never Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mtairycitizen

SO this lady spends months of her life to complain
about $.58. Get a life.

She actually made .58 cents into 158 dollars. That is a huge gain in only months. If only my stocks would increase like that.


26 posted on 11/30/2007 6:06:47 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Pennsylvania has no restriction on lawyers representing plaintiff’s or defendant’s in District Justice (Small Claims) cases.


27 posted on 11/30/2007 6:11:59 AM PST by tort_feasor (FreeRepublic.com - Tommorrow's News, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
That would still be someone’s responsibility to correct.

Yes, it was KMart's responsibility to correct. I would assume that she got overcharged once and complained to the store. When she got overcharged the sceond time, she sued because KMart failed to correct its systems.

Seems fair enough. How many people was KMart taking money from unfairly and for how long without correcting their systems?

And it seems a simple thing to, before allowing it to go to trial, to make sure the computer is charging items correctly.

Yeah. And had they done that, they wouldn't have gotten sued.

28 posted on 11/30/2007 6:13:35 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
And if I found this, I'd lose double that for taking a day off to go to court.

The litigation lottery continues. WTF is wrong with simply asking for her 28 cents back?
29 posted on 11/30/2007 6:14:21 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
She actually made .58 cents into 158 dollars. That is a huge gain in only months. If only my stocks would increase like that.

If your name was Hillary Clinton or Terry McAuliffe, they would.
30 posted on 11/30/2007 6:16:24 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: relictele
Funny, but it's the opposite around here. We have a pretty new Super Wally in our fairly affluent city and it's a pigsty. Over in brown collar Indio, there's a KMart that's probably 40 years old, and it's always spotless.

Management...

31 posted on 11/30/2007 6:17:10 AM PST by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
WTF is wrong with simply asking for her 28 cents back?

Every time you go shopping, you want to go back and stand in line and pore over your receipts and explain to the manager what is and is not taxable and then receive a refund?

Or is it reasonable to expect the store to charge the right price in the first place, especially after they are made aware of their error?

32 posted on 11/30/2007 6:19:44 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
I haven’t been in the K-Mart store in my town but once in the past year. I always ask myself, “Why do I even bother to come here?” To even think about going to K-Mart sickens me to my stomach. They will definitely be going out of business in the next few years. And their malaise is taking Sears with them.
33 posted on 11/30/2007 6:26:54 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
I've run into a similar problem in Ohio. Soft drinks here are charged sales tax. However, the definition of a soft drink largely depends on whether it is sweetened, so unsweetened iced tea (which I drink a lot) is supposed to be untaxed. A lot of stores and restaurants don't know this and just roll them in with the rest of the soft drinks. I've never gotten off my butt to complain about a dime every now and then.
34 posted on 11/30/2007 6:39:44 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Government is the hired help - not the boss. When politicians forget that they must be fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
WTF is wrong with simply asking for her 28 cents back?

She sued to make a point. They were charging taxes that were not legal. It may have been only .28 to her, but that tax was also charged to thousands of other customers.

35 posted on 11/30/2007 6:44:38 AM PST by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mtairycitizen
SO this lady spends months of her life to complain about $.58. Get a life.

Small claims court. If its set up like Texas' small claims system, she probably spent about four hours on it, trial time included. Pretty efficient system.

36 posted on 11/30/2007 6:47:19 AM PST by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
A lot of stores and restaurants don't know this and just roll them in with the rest of the soft drinks.

A lot of store and restaurants are not only fully aware that those items are not taxable, but are also aware that virtually no customer knows that they aren't. So they can collect and keep that sales tax. It might only be 25 cents, but 25 cents X 10,000 customers is money, and pure profit.

37 posted on 11/30/2007 6:50:32 AM PST by jdub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tort_feasor

I didn’t know that; I was incorrectly extrapolating from CA law: generally a mistake. Is that at all characteristic of Eastern states?


38 posted on 11/30/2007 6:53:51 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (This post sold by weight, not volume. Content may have settled during shipment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jdub
Unlikely. I doubt that they then go back and figure out which items they legally charged sales tax and send that to the state while keeping the money they illegally charged sales tax. Charging sales tax and then keeping it is an offense that could send you to prison.

More likely is that the person who checks the tax/untax box just isn't familiar with this hair splittingly fine detail of Ohio tax law.

39 posted on 11/30/2007 7:22:48 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Government is the hired help - not the boss. When politicians forget that they must be fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
*smack*

Now don't ever do that again!
40 posted on 11/30/2007 7:23:56 AM PST by LIConFem (Thompson. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter Lifetime ACU Rating: 92 (any combo will do, fellas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

She put the squeeze on their Charmin..............


41 posted on 11/30/2007 7:27:52 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Oooooh, just wait ‘til your father gets home!!


42 posted on 11/30/2007 7:29:19 AM PST by LIConFem (Thompson. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter Lifetime ACU Rating: 92 (any combo will do, fellas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
KMart was being sued for not correcting their error.

I wonder if she'd even bothered to alert them or if she just likes playing self-righteous, indignant consumer activist.

43 posted on 11/30/2007 7:45:23 AM PST by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

For a company like KMart, you are most certainly right that they wouldnt do something so stupid. But little independent markets do stuff like that all the time.


44 posted on 11/30/2007 8:23:13 AM PST by jdub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mtairycitizen

58 cents, which is a TAX THAT GOES TO THE GOVERNMENT. Do you think that the government needs MORE of OUR money?


45 posted on 11/30/2007 10:05:09 AM PST by Born Conservative (Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
I'm glad the case didn't get bogged down.


46 posted on 11/30/2007 11:43:39 AM PST by Slings and Arrows ("Bush is destroying the solar system:The ice caps on Mars are shrinking too." --Right_Wing_Madman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jdub

Please be aware that by law you are required to turn over any excess collections of sales tax or return them to the purchaser. I am a tax professional and have had problems over time with Walmart for charging tax on US and State flags which are generally exempt by most state jurisdictions. I have flat refused to pay the tax and ended up with a manager each time. I even went as far to drop off the regs for one manager so he could pass it on to corporate. These big box stores have a tendancy to mark taxable on most items of personal property and they do turn over the tax collected to the state on a monthly basis by the 20th of the month following so the state is the big winner.


47 posted on 11/30/2007 1:05:09 PM PST by MyOld66GTO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jan in Colorado

ping


48 posted on 11/30/2007 6:11:54 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

I know it holds for PA and NJ where I am licensed to practice.


49 posted on 12/02/2007 5:57:58 AM PST by tort_feasor (FreeRepublic.com - Tommorrow's News, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson