Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blue Tide In Kentucky--and Virginia
The Nation ^ | November 19, 2007

Posted on 12/02/2007 3:09:54 PM PST by Clintonfatigued

In Tuesday's off-year elections, Democrats continued to gather steam in Virginia and Kentucky--making it even more obvious that these two Southern states are up for grabs in 2008.

Kentucky's Republican Governor Ernie Fletcher, hand-picked for the job by US Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in 2003, did not merely lose his re-election bid to Democrat Steve Beshear--he got pummeled, obliterated and all-around embarrassed by a "has-been" candidate who'd dropped out of politics a decade ago after losing races for governor and Senate. Beshear won almost 60 percent of the vote. Much of Fletcher's trouble was Fletcher himself--he ran in 2003 on a promise to "clean up the mess in Frankfurt," where good-ol'-boy Democrats had long been in charge. Soon enough, though, Fletcher-the-reformer was being brought up on criminal charges for his state hiring practices--and when he struck a deal with prosecutors to drop the charges, he proceeded to pardon everyone in his administration who'd allegedly broken the law.

But this wasn't just about Fletcher--it was also about a rising Democratic tide in Kentucky that became apparent in 2006, when liberal John Yarmuth unseated one of George W. Bush's favorite members of Congress, Anne Northup. A strong antiwar movement in the state, along with a vibrant progressive blogosphere (see DitchMitch.com), has helped revitalize the party with a more progressive tilt. Now polls are showing that McConnell, who built the Republican machine in Kentucky that's now falling apart, could be in real peril when he runs for re-election next year. His water-carrying for the President, especially on Iraq and immigration, have taken his approval ratings to all-time lows.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenation.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2007; fletcher; purplestates; thenation; vageneralassembly

1 posted on 12/02/2007 3:09:55 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat; fieldmarshaldj; LdSentinal; Norman Bates; MassachusettsGOP; NeoCaveman; ...

The Left is increasingly hopeful about their prospets. The mixed results of 2007 hasn’t dampened their enthusiasm.


2 posted on 12/02/2007 3:11:06 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
The Nation moonbats are delusional. All elections are local, period.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 12/02/2007 3:11:33 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
The Left is looking at 2008 as a referendum on Bush,

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

4 posted on 12/02/2007 3:12:24 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Hillary has a shot at KY ONLY if we put up Rudy or another RINO that assures a 3rd party Conservative challenge.


5 posted on 12/02/2007 3:13:13 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
His water-carrying for the President, especially on Iraq and immigration, have taken his approval ratings to all-time lows.

Note that the Nation commies don't bother to mention that the Bush position on immigration was NOT the "red" one. Opposition to the president on immigration does not point to a glorious progressive takeover of the South. Just the opposite.

6 posted on 12/02/2007 3:15:46 PM PST by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The Nation. Now there’s a credible source. LOL


7 posted on 12/02/2007 3:16:27 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
It wouldn’t be the influx of Mexicans and followers of I Slam that’s triggered this “progressive tide” would it?
8 posted on 12/02/2007 3:21:58 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I think they are misreading the winds. If there had been a strong Republican candidate for Governor instead of Fletcher who had an administration racked by scandal the race wouldn’t have been nearly as unbalanced. Kentucky or Virginia haven’t stopped being conservative states especially when you look at the Democrats who won. Let us not forget that Bob Corker won while Allen went down to defeat in VA. It had nothing to do with the strength of the Democrat opponents or a desire for liberal policies but rather the weakness of the Campaigns and the candidates on the Republican side. Allen shouldn’t have lost but first he got embroiled in the MaKaka silliness and even foolishly apologized and then went on some pro-feminist retreat at the end of his campaign. I have no idea who was running his campaign but may I recommend they never be employed in a campaign again.

The Democrats will always have a chance if they run semi-conservative candidates in conservative states and the Republicans run individuals who don’t know how to fight or get tied up in silly political games. Corker fought like he needed to...he didn’t hold any punches and won against a tide that could’ve easily swept him away. Republicans should take note that there are no nice guy awards in politics, there are only winners and losers.


9 posted on 12/02/2007 3:27:11 PM PST by Maelstorm (Stupidty disguised as feelings is not a good excuse for bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
It wouldn’t be the influx of Mexicans and followers of I Slam that’s triggered this “progressive tide” would it?

Naah! Where do you think all those liberals that screwed up NY, MA, CN, Philly, ect., are moving to now that they are being taxed to death?

Problem is...they never learn, and they're bringing their liberal ideologies with them and will eventually corrupt these two states.

10 posted on 12/02/2007 3:27:48 PM PST by Banjoguy (The stench that surrounds us, emanates from Washington, D.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
"clean up the mess in Frankfurt,"

I'm pretty sure that the capital of Kentucky is Frankfort. Franfurt is a city in Germany the European Union.

11 posted on 12/02/2007 3:33:30 PM PST by Doohickey (Giuliani: Brokeback Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Then they’re looking at it all wrong....they really should figure out what went wrong for them in LA recently.


12 posted on 12/02/2007 3:38:38 PM PST by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Corker was losing the election because he stopped campaigning seriously after the primary nomination. Worse for him, half the base did not want him because of his stench of RINOism (most especially this voter). Junior campaigned as if HE had won the GOP nomination. He lost momentum when a stunt he attempted backfired when he tried to crash a Corker event (what he wanted was big burly White men ejecting a Black man on camera — it didn’t happen, and Corker walked straight up to him, shook his hand, and told him what’s what). First time Corker took a lead in looking like a man. Fred’s campaigning for him also helped to put him over, albeit Corker’s margin was incredibly underwhelming. It was, as it turned out, the only successful open GOP seat we defended last year.


13 posted on 12/02/2007 3:39:31 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
If Hillary wins the nomination, next November most voters will have watched her sideshow, heard that hideous voice, seen that icy glare, stared at her as she again avoided answering any reporters' questions by using her private army of thugs, and go into the privacy of the voting booth and vote Republican.

"How can that be? No one I know voted for Nixon!" New Yorker Pauline Kael on the 1972 electoral victory of Richard Nixon over George McGovern.

14 posted on 12/02/2007 3:42:27 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Last month, newcomer Jim Oganowski almost beat Nikki Tsongas, widow of Saint Paul Tsongas, here in MA for a congressional seat.


15 posted on 12/02/2007 3:44:47 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
a rising Democratic tide in Kentucky

Hmmmm well this is interesting Kentucky has been a Democrat State since i can remember its no big deal that they had a Repub Gov

These folks are real American old style dems the ones who know what America is and are thankful for it ...

Not todays Dems who hate anything to do with freedom and love liberal Politics !

Problem is they are gonna get sucked up into the hate America crowd without even knowing they drank the Koolaid.....

16 posted on 12/02/2007 3:46:38 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (Global Warming : Tape a liberals mouth shut and thats the end of Global Warming {both ways})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I’ve always thought of Kentucky as a swing state. As for Virginia, it’s unfortunate everyone northeast & west coast kook is moving here because of the high taxes in those states. All the kooks keep moving here and they are destroying the once great Commonwealth of Virginia. The 1986 Reagan amnesty proved to be a total disaster for this once great country.


17 posted on 12/02/2007 3:57:03 PM PST by 3_wheeler (Freedom Isn't Free (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conservative_americans))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Allen shouldn’t have lost but first he got embroiled in the MaKaka silliness and even foolishly apologized and then went on some pro-feminist retreat at the end of his campaign. I have no idea who was running his campaign but may I recommend they never be employed in a campaign again.

I seem to remember there were also rumors that he had homosexuals working on his staff and no one shot the rumors down.

18 posted on 12/02/2007 4:03:12 PM PST by antinomian (Show me a robber baron and I'll show you a pocket full of senators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 3_wheeler

Virginia would vote for a Democrat in 2008 if someone like John Edwards win. Other than that, Virginia is not likely to become completely blue until 2012 or 2016.


19 posted on 12/02/2007 4:03:12 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

If the Dems win one more state than that fool, John Kerry won, then they are in the White House.


20 posted on 12/02/2007 4:17:47 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

You are absolutely correct, and they will not vote for Hillary or Rudy for that matter. The Old Skool Dems will vote Dem locally, but usually cross lines to Republicans in National elections.


21 posted on 12/02/2007 4:22:28 PM PST by WildcatClan (Duncan Hunter, the real deal, the only deal for Conservative Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Fletcher in Kentucky was done in by a full-blown witchhunt spearheaded by Attorney General Greg Stumbo. The Fletcher administration didn’t do anything that the Democrats had not been doing for the past 20something years. Fletcher is a good man, he just lost his chance.


22 posted on 12/02/2007 4:57:14 PM PST by debboo (Stop socialism, vote conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildcatClan

Bingo


23 posted on 12/02/2007 6:39:16 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (Global Warming : Tape a liberals mouth shut and thats the end of Global Warming {both ways})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Delusional? Has one single GOP candidate won in any of the off-cycle elections besides Jindel? Especially when it comes to the Congress. Sure they are local, but you are talking about territory we took from the Dems during the last several cycles; is it really all going back to them, and, if so, for what reason in particular...
24 posted on 12/02/2007 7:11:44 PM PST by Amalie (FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Another thing about KY Republicans: many never bother to vote. They have very low turnout numbers.


25 posted on 12/02/2007 8:09:01 PM PST by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 3_wheeler

How true it is, to paraphrase that old Reagan supporter Jackie Gleason.


26 posted on 12/02/2007 8:10:33 PM PST by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
But this wasn't just about Fletcher--it was also about a rising Democratic tide in Kentucky that became apparent in 2006, when liberal John Yarmuth unseated one of George W. Bush's favorite members of Congress, Anne Northup.

To call this an exaggeration is an understatement. Northup lost very narrowly in a Democrat-leaning district. An election with a very strong Democratic wave with a competitive opponent could have certainly taken her down - and it did. Not to mention, she understandably had a loss of heart for running that race. In less than a years time prior to that election, she had to have major knee surgery, her father died, and worst of all her son had a tragic, unexpected death a few months before the election. Democrat Presidential candidates carried her district every time she ran with a Presidential race - Clinton, Gore, and Kerry.

Moreover, if Fletcher had not gotten into all of those scandals, he would have been re-elected, or with a different candidate given the scandals, we would have had a very good chance of holding that governorship. That had nothing to do with a "blue tide." The two other incumbent Republican officeholders on the ballot, Secretary of State Trey Grayson and Agriculture Commissioner Richie Farmer, not only were re-elected, but significantly increase their margins over their victories 4 years prior. In addition, Fletcher lost some solid GOP counties - that is not due to them "turning blue" as the voters stuck with the rest of the GOP ticket, and not just Grayson and Farmer, but the relatively weak candidates running on the rest of the ballot.

Republicans have been running well in national races with the Democrats winning the governorship handidly for many decades now. That doesn't mean that it is a given, but this anaylsis stating that Fletcher losing is itself a sign of a "blue tide" is ridiculous.

27 posted on 12/02/2007 8:26:59 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

They all polled well against her - except for Romney, who is the only candidate in opposition that put her at 50%, and him losing to her by double digits.


28 posted on 12/02/2007 8:28:24 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

That’s not true.

However, we can’t hold a candle to the 120% turnout in some Eastern Kentucky Democrat precincts (yes, this has happened).


29 posted on 12/02/2007 8:32:55 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

It’s interesting how some of the GOP candidates poll so differently overall. The biggest argument the RINO candidates make is that they can win rodent-leaning states. All polling data indicates that is simply not true, as there isn’t a single state in which they lead Hillary, and as you point out, we risk losing fairly reliable GOP states with the RINO candidates. Down here in TN, Hillary was tied with Rudy in one poll (which meant she could be conceivably leading him) while in the same poll, she trailed badly behind Fred. It’s one reason why we should just get behind Fred and work hard on duplicating what we won in ‘04. We’re not going to be making a return to the pre-’88 pattern anytime soon, unfortunately (if Dubya couldn’t do it in ‘04, we aren’t going to do it in an open race situation).


30 posted on 12/02/2007 8:52:39 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
These folks are real American old style dems the ones who know what America is and are thankful for it ...

Problem is that these old school dems will pull the D lever out of habit, although many will reject the b!tch if she get the nomination...unless they see a carpetbagger on the other side...

31 posted on 12/02/2007 10:47:49 PM PST by Gilbo_3 (A few Rams must look after the sheep 'til the Good Shepherd returns...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
***biggest argument the RINO candidates make is that they can win rodent-leaning states. All polling data indicates that is simply not true***

Over the weekend, I had a conservation with a Giuliani supporter. He was also a Topinka supporter. He claimed it was unfair for “moderates” to run in Marxist Red districts, while conservatives get to run in safe, True Blue American districts. He hoped that a President Giuliani or McCain, or Romney would appoint a RNC chairman who would “level the playing field” in True Blue American districts for “moderates”. According to him, Jim Edgar is the true voice of rural America.

32 posted on 12/03/2007 12:04:25 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

These RINOs make me sick. The only thing they’re interested in is reducing the Republican party to a small minority that they alone occupy and playing footsie with their rodent masters. Kinda like Massachusetts.


33 posted on 12/03/2007 12:12:06 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

A Join Rudy campaign office opened up a few blocks from my home. So I will have to pass by the office even time I go out.

Illinois is fast turning into a Masshole of the Midwest. The problem is IL is nowhere near as liberal as San Francisco or Cambridge, MA. We have a corrupt RINO establishment and squabbling conservatives who vie for the right to speak for all cosnervatives. For example, the gloves are off in the IL-14 race. Oberweis is calling Lauzen, a fake conservative who kisses up to the Combine. Very Laughable considering, Oberweis’s history.


34 posted on 12/03/2007 12:24:39 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

Does Lauzen kiss up to the Combine ?


35 posted on 12/03/2007 12:33:11 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Lauzen is no friend of the RINO Establishment. Back in 1998, when Lauzen ran for IL Comptroller, the RINO Establishment wanted Harold Seigel, a wealthy businessman who donated money to Carol Mosty Fraud in 1992. Lauzen beat Seigel in the primary and Il GOP gave little support to Lauzen. Most party support went to Lying Ryan. In 2000, Gov Ryan was pissed that Lauzen refused to vote for his pork spending ways. Ryan recruited a local school board memember, Sunny Abello, to run against Lauzen in the 2000 primary. Lauzen easily warded off Ryan’s challenge.


36 posted on 12/03/2007 12:38:41 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

Yeah, we really messed up their plans in ‘98. Fitzgerald beat the Topinka clone Comptroller Loleta Didrickson (can you have pictured her beating Carol Mostly Fraud ? That race would’ve been like the Blago-Topinka one), and if he hadn’t had any $$, the party would’ve been content to have permitted Carol to stay. Of course, the upside to that is that Obama wouldn’t have been able to leave the legislature to run in ‘04. He couldn’t even make it to the House, because Bobby Rush made it an issue that he wasn’t Black enough to represent the 1st. Gotta love IL politics.


37 posted on 12/03/2007 12:51:15 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Loleta Didrickson wasn’t sure about running for Senate. The IL GOP wanted a woman candidate from Cook County. Loleta ran because the IL GOP bigwigs wanted her to run. Loleta expected to coast in the primary. When Fitz gained ground on her, she portrayed Fitz as a religious zealot. Real smart move in a GOP primary.

As for Obama. He went thru a makeover. In the 2000 House primary, he wore a bow tie. He reminded me of Steve Urkel. Now with his Presidential run, he is clean shaven and lose some weight. The liberal women in the Chicago Sun Times like to refer to Obama as another Brad Pitt.


38 posted on 12/03/2007 1:01:47 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

That’s what is so funny. The RINO Establishment, rather then backing “fire in the belly” candidates that the Conservatives have been, they drag RINOs into the race that are either openly reluctant or clearly disinterested. How many have there been so far ? Didrickson, Topinka, Bob Kustra (’96 Senate race), Dave O’Neal in 1980...


39 posted on 12/03/2007 1:09:10 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
If Hillary wins the nomination, next November most voters will have watched her sideshow, heard that hideous voice, seen that icy glare, stared at her as she again avoided answering any reporters' questions by using her private army of thugs, and go into the privacy of the voting booth and vote Republican Democrat, just like they've been told to by their favorite daytime talk-show hosts, their favorite morning news blondes, and their favorite American Idol stars, because that's what the American sheep will do.

There, must have truth in ads, here.

40 posted on 12/03/2007 2:16:38 PM PST by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; Republican Wildcat; fieldmarshaldj; LdSentinal

Bull, McConnell didn’t handpick Fletcher at all. As I recall, he endorsed Ann Northrup in the beginning.

And it’s spelled “Frankfort.”

Foreigner.


41 posted on 12/04/2007 8:44:32 PM PST by DaveLoneRanger (May your days be merry and bright, and may all your Christmases be white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

Speaking of Chris Lauzen, is he considered the favorite to win the special election to succeed Dennis Hastert?


42 posted on 12/05/2007 5:39:19 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj

Yesterday on a radio interview, Oberweis is claiming that Eric Cantor endorses him. I think the GOP establishment is backing Oberweis, because he is willing to self-finance his campaign. The Dem candidate, Foster, is self-financing his own campaign.


43 posted on 12/07/2007 9:28:05 AM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

Lauzen is also willing to self-finance. He loaned his campaign over $300K.


44 posted on 12/07/2007 5:00:33 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson