Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Craig: 'Latest allegations are completely false'
KTVB.com ^ | 12/2/07 | Ysabel Bilbao

Posted on 12/02/2007 6:41:57 PM PST by freespirited

Five men have come forward to say they have had sexual encounters with Idaho’s senior senator Larry Craig. In Sunday’s edition of the Idaho Statesmen four of the men are revealing their names. Senator Craig is denying these allegations.

Two of the accusers' names were released in previous publications when they claimed of having encounters with Craig. The names of two other men are new, and there's an anonymous fifth accusation from a local man who fears if he releases his name, he faces retaliation.

In audiotapes they say this.

David Phillips

David Phillips first told his story to Washington DC gossip website, wonkette. Phillips, an IT man in DC told the website that 20-years ago he had a sexual encounter with Craig.

Mike Jones

Mike Jones, who you may have heard of before for his involvement with the Ted Haggard sex scandal says he took 200 dollars from Craig for sex, more than two years ago. Jones told the paper he didn't know who Craig was until he saw his first news conference back on August 28th. Rumors that Jones had met with Craig surfaced in October, but Jones never admitted to having sex with the Senator until now.

Greg Ruth

Greg Ruth who is from Tacoma, Washington says back in 1981 while at a republican conference in Coeur d’Alene Craig, who was a bachelor at the time, followed him into the bathroom and tried to make conversation. Ruth who was openly gay told the Statesman Craig gave him his number and told him, he could stay with him when he visited Washington DC.

Tom Russell

Tom Russell, a Nampa native who now lives in Utah contacted the Statesman about what he says was unusual behavior from the Senator. Russell, who was openly gay when he met Craig, says the Senator suggested a meeting and allegedly used signals typical of gay men in public places.

The fifth person who is a gay Boise businessman says that he and Senator Craig were on the same plane from Boise to Denver, when Craig made the same motions to him that he was later arrested for in a Minneapolis airport bathroom.

The Statesman says in its investigation they don't have videos, messages, or a letter from Craig to these men but we need to keep in mind these allegations also cannot be disproved.

This is the statement Senator Craig released about the Statesman’s allegations.

“It is unfortunate that the Idaho Statesman has chosen to continue to lower itself to the standards of what can best be described as tabloid journalism. Like its previous coverage, these latest allegations are completely false and have no basis in reality. In fact, the paper itself states that these baseless accusations contain no definitive evidence yet they still decided to print them anyway. However, despite the fact the Idaho Statesman has decided to pursue its own agenda and print these falsehoods without any facts to back them up, I won’t let this paper’s attempt to malign my name stop me from continuing my work to serve the people of Idaho.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: 110th; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; larrycraig
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-83 next last
Anyone believe the Senator? Not me.
1 posted on 12/02/2007 6:41:59 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freespirited

It’s never the crime, it’s the cover-up.


2 posted on 12/02/2007 6:43:24 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Robble robble robble.


3 posted on 12/02/2007 6:44:00 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

pass the tissue


4 posted on 12/02/2007 6:44:18 PM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Craig should go hang out with the Plames at the Old News Bar.


5 posted on 12/02/2007 6:44:43 PM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

“Wide Stance” just keeps getting wider. Pretty soon you won’t have a leg to stand on, Larry.


6 posted on 12/02/2007 6:48:21 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

7 posted on 12/02/2007 6:48:26 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
"I won’t let this paper’s attempt to malign my name stop me from continuing my work to serve the people of Idaho.”

We will fight them on the beaches, we will fight them on the landing grounds, we will fight them in the hills - we shall never surrender!

You got em right where you want em now, Larry. Stick it to em good!!

8 posted on 12/02/2007 6:48:54 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

haha thats got to be from Porky’s I


9 posted on 12/02/2007 6:50:25 PM PST by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Just resign and go away!!/blah!!


10 posted on 12/02/2007 6:51:42 PM PST by PROCON (Merry CHRISTmas!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tear gas

I wonder if his wife is starting to believe she may be married to a gay man. On 60 minutes or something they interviewed both of them and she looked like she believed him, but now another 5 allegations, she’s got to start to wonder.


11 posted on 12/02/2007 6:51:49 PM PST by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Anyone believe the Senator? Not me.

The account of the undercover cop in the MN bathroom seals it for me. Were it not for that, this would just be a he said/he said.

12 posted on 12/02/2007 6:52:48 PM PST by umgud (the profound is only so to those that it is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
She knows it's all political. Haven't you ever waved your hand to someone in the next stall?

ROFL

13 posted on 12/02/2007 6:53:58 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Anyone believe the Senator? Not me.

To be fair who really knows since all this stuff is hearsay!


14 posted on 12/02/2007 6:54:24 PM PST by restornu (Discern effects of evils & designs which exist in the hearts of conspiring men in the last days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Senator Craig: 'Latest allegations are completely false'
At least he's finally admitting now that the previous ones weren't.

 
15 posted on 12/02/2007 7:00:14 PM PST by counterpunch (Hillary'08 :: At Least She's Not Rudy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

If Craig was with Beulah, we’d be less worried.


16 posted on 12/02/2007 7:02:42 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Maybe Craig’s wife is into Kinky stuff also and they a marriage of convenience.
17 posted on 12/02/2007 7:06:30 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

18 posted on 12/02/2007 7:08:17 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Naaah. Too easy to caption.

19 posted on 12/02/2007 7:09:11 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Why is still around? And why is he still in denial???
20 posted on 12/02/2007 7:13:10 PM PST by Santa Fe_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Image hosted by Photobucket.com and the plot thickens, or his stance widens, as the case may be...
21 posted on 12/02/2007 7:13:15 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Senator Craig: A man in deep denial.


22 posted on 12/02/2007 7:14:26 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I’m not buying none of these testemonials!

Where is the DNA?

Bring me evidence, not accusations!


23 posted on 12/02/2007 7:18:01 PM PST by Randy Larsen (I'M WITH FRED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
It's time for you to go, Larr, ol' buddy, ol' pal.

If you insist on sticking around, you'll get your wide stance whupped in the primary.

Claiming that "the latest allegations are completely false" does not negate a Guilty plea or a stated intention to resign.

Which you are now welshing on...

From here, Larr, there is no way for your sorry ass to go but down!

24 posted on 12/02/2007 7:20:28 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

25 posted on 12/02/2007 7:24:01 PM PST by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tear gas
Like who ever picked up a piece of toilet paper off the filthy floor of a public restroom?
26 posted on 12/02/2007 7:29:22 PM PST by Leisler (RNC, RINO National Committee. Always was, always will be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

27 posted on 12/02/2007 7:31:07 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Pfft, most of the claims sound pretty incredible.

The hagard prostitute just happened to have a homosexual tryst with Larry Craig and he just now recalls it?

Craig was all over the airwaves for the NRA in the Senate, and this prostitute now recalls?

I’m calling BS on that one.

The dude on the plane?

Does that sound remotely credible?

“The same motions he made in the restroom in MN”?

On a plane? How?

I won’t bother to go line by line through the Newspaper “piece” as IMO, Craig should have been as good as his word and resigned.

Why discredit these statements for a guy who is not keeping his word to all of us?


28 posted on 12/02/2007 7:38:43 PM PST by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: padre35

Craig is a distraction and needs to go quietly. No one believes him, sad but true. His career is over.


29 posted on 12/02/2007 7:41:04 PM PST by tioga (Dear Santa..........I can explain....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All
... His character is just as good as his word... This is the kind of weasel we don't need in the GOP


30 posted on 12/02/2007 7:41:42 PM PST by ElPatriota (Duncan Hunter 08 -- I am proud to support this man for my president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Anyone believe the Senator? Not me.

Anyone believe the ultra-liberal Idaho Statesman? Not me. Proof is what's needed, not unsupported allegations.

31 posted on 12/02/2007 7:41:59 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tioga
"Craig is a distraction and needs to go quietly. No one believes him, sad but true. His career is over."

Could not agree with you more but that darn Democrat slime machine sure works hard these day don't they?...the unfortunate thing is these RINOS give them easy pickings....

32 posted on 12/02/2007 7:48:20 PM PST by oust the louse ("NEVER LET THE ENEMY PICK THE BATTLESITE".....General George S. Patton,Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

Well - assuming that fabrications are that easy to manufacture and peddle - take a look at someone even more reviled on the left, say Newt Gingrich, and ask why there haven’t been spades of such accusations (gay, straight, etc., etc., etc.) against them.


33 posted on 12/02/2007 7:53:01 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
Anyone believe the ultra-liberal Idaho Statesman? Not me. Proof is what's needed, not unsupported allegations.

What evidence would meet your definition of proof?

34 posted on 12/02/2007 7:58:59 PM PST by freespirited (I'm voting for the GOP nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

Exactly correct.

The Demonrats want Senator Craig out of office so badly - how difficult is it for them to find 5 gay men to make unsubstantiated charges against Senator Craig given the foot tapping arrest in the Minneapolis Airport.

THAT arrest was totally bogus.

These accusations are without substantiation and therefore bogus as well.

But they add to the mindset out there that has affected many here to go with the tabloidal accusations rather than understanding WHAT is at WORK here and it is NOT that the Senator is gay or bi or anything but a faithful husband of his wife.

It is a full blown effort to get rid of a Conservative Republican US Senator (how many of those are left???) who has come down strongly on the right side of prolife and pro marriage issues.

Wake up. Or...for Sunday...waketh upeth.


35 posted on 12/02/2007 7:59:44 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen

“Where is the DNA? Bring me evidence, not accusations!”

You want his DNA? Eeeewwww, gross!


36 posted on 12/02/2007 8:02:49 PM PST by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense? Don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

He should have resigned like he said he would.

These allegations may be false, but given his behavior and flip-flops on guility pleas, etc. and then deciding he’ll just stay in power, he should have expected this. He could have ended it.


37 posted on 12/02/2007 8:03:25 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

exactly.


38 posted on 12/02/2007 8:14:28 PM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: oust the louse

-he learned a few lessons from the clintoons....unfortunately.


39 posted on 12/02/2007 8:19:14 PM PST by tioga (Dear Santa..........I can explain....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tioga
Craig is a distraction and needs to go quietly. No one believes him, sad but true. His career is over.

You are falling into their trap!

Rules for Radicals provides the organizer with a tactical style for community organization that assumes an adversarial relationship between groups of people in which one either dominates or is dominated.

“Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this. They can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

40 posted on 12/02/2007 8:20:54 PM PST by bigjoesaddle ("By Grabthar's hammer......what a savings")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Hell no I don’t believe the idiot. Get the hell out of Washington ASAP, you poofer.


41 posted on 12/02/2007 8:23:51 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigjoesaddle

Craig fell into the trap when he succumbed to sin.


42 posted on 12/02/2007 8:25:13 PM PST by tioga (Dear Santa..........I can explain....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
McClatchey (Statesman) is trying to turn a conservative Red state into a liberal Blue one -- and the concentrated voting power in Ada County (Boise) is probably enough to pull it off given Idaho's small population. Remember Frank Church?

Craig's situation is in no way comparable to Newt's. What's wrong with due process of law in Craig's case? I think that's mentioned in the Constitution somewhere. Maybe he's gay but if not he deserves the chance to defend himself.

43 posted on 12/02/2007 8:27:31 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
What evidence would meet your definition of proof?

Due process in a court of law, not the court of the media.

44 posted on 12/02/2007 8:29:06 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

He said he said...let’s put the evidence to this. Could be true...but one must have solid evidence to back up these claims. Not defending Craig...but come on...


45 posted on 12/02/2007 8:29:31 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Thanks - glad others see it. Most do not.


46 posted on 12/02/2007 8:31:43 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
THAT arrest was totally bogus.

Yep. I have maintained something close to that all along. I don't know if any of these allegations are true or not. But I'm not convinced by any facts so far that he has done anyting wrong except except wide-stanced toe-tapping. I hope Craig continues to fight these accusations because even if Craig is gay (and guilty) I fear dems will be empowered to go after straight conservatives with false accusations.

47 posted on 12/02/2007 8:35:15 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
'Latest allegations are completely false'

I'm still bothered about the earlier criminal conviction, Senator Craig. Why are you still here? Please do the GOP a favor (as well as the citizens of Idaho and the entire United States) and resign NOW.

48 posted on 12/02/2007 8:37:52 PM PST by Hoodat (satan always overplays his hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Totally correct. You "get it" also. The POINT is that Shrillery and company want Senator Craig's conservative Republican vote GONE and will do whatever they can to see that it is gone. I have seen nothing either to substantiate ANY of these bogus contentions and accusations and hope the Senator continues to stand and fight!!!! And hope the wimpy Repubs finally "get it" and fight with him. Let's see - Senator Santorum - gone

Senator Allen - gone

They are picking them off one by one. Wake UP (not you).

49 posted on 12/02/2007 8:42:20 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Anyone believe the Senator? Not me.

Ditto!


50 posted on 12/02/2007 8:44:06 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson