Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Early release for nonviolent offenders proposed[by U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee(D)Texas]
Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau ^ | Dec. 5, 2007 | MICHELLE MITTELSTADT

Posted on 12/05/2007 2:21:23 PM PST by SwinneySwitch

Jackson Lee's bill could aid Skilling, Fastow, Wyatt and thousands of other federal prisoners

WASHINGTON — Drug traffickers, white-collar criminals, corrupt congressmen and thousands of other federal inmates could see their prison time slashed in half if legislation drafted by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee becomes law.

The House Judiciary crime subcommittee on Thursday will examine a bill by the Houston Democrat that would mandate early release for federal inmates convicted of nonviolent crimes if they are 45 or older, have served at least half their sentence and have not engaged in violent conduct behind bars.

Jackson Lee described her legislation as a way of returning nonviolent offenders to society so they can be productive citizens, help their families and reduce spiraling incarceration costs.

"This legislation is to reward good behavior," Jackson Lee said in an interview. "It is a process intended to protect the public as well as to provide some relief for the families and these individuals who can be adjudged rehabilitated or ready to be released in some form."

High-profile Houston cases

Jackson Lee's proposal could free some high-profile, white-collar criminals from prison early. Among the possible beneficiaries: former Enron executives Jeffrey Skilling and Andrew Fastow, disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, recently convicted Houston oilman Oscar Wyatt and, according to federal Bureau of Prisons estimates, as many as 12,400 others.

Some civil rights advocates have argued that a 1984 law establishing mandatory minimum sentences, aimed primarily at drug offenders, has resulted in harsh penalties for thousands of minority citizens.

House Republicans oppose the bill, which would undo the sentencing structure that Congress imposed in 1984 when it effectively ended parole in the federal prison system and required that most offenders serve at least 85 percent of their sentences.

"Democrats should think long and hard before supporting a bill that would severely damage our criminal justice system and could have catastrophic effects on society as a whole," said Rep. Randy Forbes of Virginia, the top Republican on the crime subcommittee.

Many could benefit

Forbes said the bill would require the release of about 6 percent of the 200,148 federal inmates currently imprisoned.

"That means criminals convicted of fraud, civil rights violations, immigration violations, or even the sexual solicitation of a minor would receive early release from prison," he said. "Even Skilling would be eligible for an early release."

The Bureau of Prisons and Justice Department declined comment on the proposed legislation. But a House Republican aide familiar with the bill, speaking on condition of anonymity, said arsonists, embezzlers, burglars, money launderers and people convicted of possessing child pornography also could potentially benefit.

Under the federal definition of what constitutes a violent crime, only inmates convicted of murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault and non-negligent manslaughter would fall under the violent offender category exempt from Jackson Lee's bill, according to GOP aides.

Though Jackson Lee said inmates would have to go through a strict vetting process, her legislation does not establish guidelines, essentially mandating the release of all inmates who fit the age, time served and nonviolent crime criteria.

Jackson Lee described her legislation as a first draft and said she would be happy to work with Republicans or others who have concerns about the measure or wish to limit its impact. "I am willing to compromise," she said.

But the GOP aide suggested there was little room for common ground.

'Ready to listen'

Jackson Lee expressed some consternation that Republicans are criticizing the bill even before it gets a hearing Thursday.

"I'm ready to listen to them. Why don't they wait and listen to the testimony?"

Having a hearing on the bill is a "great first step," Jackson Lee said, adding that she will later push for the Judiciary Committee to approve the legislation.

michelle.mittelstadt@chron.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; US: District of Columbia; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 110th; corruption; democratparty; democrats; sheilajacksonlee
What would we do without Sheila?
1 posted on 12/05/2007 2:21:25 PM PST by SwinneySwitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

“What would we do without Sheila?”

Move forward, and make constructive progress as a country.


2 posted on 12/05/2007 2:23:45 PM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
Drug traffickers, white-collar criminals, corrupt congressmen and thousands of other federal inmates could see their prison time slashed in half if legislation drafted by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee becomes law.

Bad ideas all around. I might agree to it if we were talking about reducing prison terms for drug users (I personally think it's a total waste of taxpayer money to incarcerate potheads, but that's just me), but the sorts of crooks in this list don't need leniency.
3 posted on 12/05/2007 2:25:17 PM PST by JamesP81 ("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Excellent. More veto bait.


4 posted on 12/05/2007 2:28:18 PM PST by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
...corrupt congressmen and thousands of other federal inmates could see their prison time slashed

Now we see the self-protecting motive. The extent of the damage done to society should be a factor in deciding who gets out. Thus, corrupt congressmen should be the very last on the list.

5 posted on 12/05/2007 2:32:38 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

I’ll bet she gets one whopper of a Christmas Card this year from William Jefferson, Democrat of Louisiana.


6 posted on 12/05/2007 2:34:23 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Now we see the self-protecting motive.

Yeah, that wasn't lost on me either. Perhaps Lee thinks there's a chance this law might help her out someday?
7 posted on 12/05/2007 2:36:41 PM PST by JamesP81 ("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Dont be too hard on Sheila. She jes be tryin to get her fambly out in time for she relekshun.


8 posted on 12/05/2007 2:40:11 PM PST by cquiggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

I heard a report on the Los Angeles County jail system a few days ago. In that report, it was stated that the county plans on decentralizing it’s big jail population. Violent offenders will remain incarcerated, while other inmates will be released to serve their sentences under house arrest and a variety of other schemes.

Some judge has ruled the county jail system is too overcrowded and the situation is inhmane, or some such.

I say, publish the bastard’s home address and allow all the non-violent offenders to frequent his neighborhood and home.


9 posted on 12/05/2007 2:40:11 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Mr. President, Article IV Section IV is in our Constitution, and the states it refers to are ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

Anything this Lee clown supports is bad for the U.S. and its law abiding citizens.


10 posted on 12/05/2007 2:52:45 PM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
She just wants her immediate family released so hat they can come to Christmas dinner!

LLS

11 posted on 12/05/2007 2:54:33 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
What would we do without Sheila?

Oh geez, I thought we got rid of the witch.

12 posted on 12/05/2007 2:58:25 PM PST by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
Early release for non violent offenders suggested....

Of course, they will all vote Democrat..where is the Captain of the obvious?

13 posted on 12/05/2007 2:59:14 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
I personally think it's a total waste of taxpayer money to incarcerate potheads...

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at PhotobucketPhoto Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

"Dude... you talkin' about us?"

14 posted on 12/05/2007 3:20:02 PM PST by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
Heard that serial killers say they are predominantly Republican.
15 posted on 12/05/2007 3:34:33 PM PST by SwinneySwitch (US Constitution Article 4 Section 4..shall protect each of them against Invasion...domestic Violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

I don’t support this bill, but I do believe we should stop putting mere pot dealers in jail with hard criminals. When they get out, they sure won’t be mere pot dealers anymore.


16 posted on 12/05/2007 6:41:45 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
I don’t support this bill, but I do believe we should stop putting mere pot dealers in jail with hard criminals. When they get out, they sure won’t be mere pot dealers anymore.

Exactly. Society is not well served by incarcerating potheads, and I think locking a stoner up with robbers, rapists, and killers is far more punishment than is justified.
17 posted on 12/05/2007 6:44:09 PM PST by JamesP81 ("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson