Is Hillary’s candidacy legal?

Independent Indian, via Indian & Pakistani Friends of Ron Paul ^ | July 10, 2007 | Subroto Roy

[Waco]

Her sux too!

[Past Your Eyes]

Edith Bolling Galt Wilson, most notably.

[Past Your Eyes]

Good grief. This is just pitiful.

[I see my hands]

Don't hold your breath.

[OESY]

To quote another blogger:

"But what [is] the real issue? It was concern that more than two terms as President would lead to excessive executive power and influence over government and public policy matters! The longer a person or a party holds political power, the greater the opportunity and, therefore, the possibility that he or she will seriously compromise the processes by which politics and representative government can function. When you have a charismatic leader, these concerns become even more worrisome."



COMMENT: This is a subject worthy of discussion. Hillary's election is not inevitable, Sheeple.

.

[Dog Gone]

Many foreign reporters just don’t “get it” when trying to understand US laws and customs. I suppose we don’t know much about the laws and customs of India either! LOL

Maybe we write stupid articles trying to interpret their laws, but I haven't seen any that I can recall.

To put the lack of logic and rational reasoning into perspective in this piece, a US corporation is also considered as a US citizen.

So, arguably Microsoft could run for President.

[darkangel82]

Well, Hillary did always say “We are the president.”

[wimpycat]

Nice try, but no cigar.

[dmw]

Sounds good to me.

[BallyBill]

Heck with Hillary, who are the “Pakistani friends of Ron Paul” and why are they in India?

[Goreknowshowtocheat]

Exactly, he should be illegal to put a rapist in as POTUS, but we crossed that barrier rather easily.

[uptoolate]

The idea at the root of this is that marriage is a legally meaningful relationship and that spouses are one and the same person in the eyes of the law.

That would make Hillary guilty of perjury and has already been impeached!

Does that mean that Hillary is guilty of being with Monica too?

[Dog Gone]

COMMENT: This is a subject worthy of discussion. Hillary's election is not inevitable, Sheeple.

Don't capitalize the "S" when calling me this. It's just not right.

[danamco]

COMMENT: This is a subject worthy of discussion. Hillary's election is not inevitable, Sheeple.

No court would touch the Clintons with a six foot pole!!!

[Graybeard58]

One of the more stupid articles I have read. Not he stupidest, mind you.

[Azzurri]

Damn, even our whack-jobs are being outsourced to India now.

LOL!

[JustaDumbBlonde]

Who said Hillary's election was inevitable? I have, in fact, said many times that she will not win the democrat nomination.

That doesn't change the fact that her candidacy won't possibly be found to be illegal. If you want to waste the bandwidth, have at it. It is still technically a free country. ;-)

[Redcloak]

Well... They did market themselves as "co-Presidents" back in the '90s.

[Buddy B]

Does that mean that Hillary is guilty of being with Monica too?

Could be or was Hillary gone for the day?

[Panzerlied]

This is Hugh and Series. Set beebers to stun!