Posted on 12/15/2007 5:53:10 AM PST by Clive
It is Mother Corp creating a comedy series in an attempt to use it to instruct us on political rectitude.
Mother Corp has had to resort to a TV advertising campaign in other channels to try to persuade Canadians to watch it.
You may have gotten your impression that it is a "hit" by watching one of those commercials, possibly while watching Fox News on the Canadian digital cable band.
I knew there was an hours special last Wednesday. I did tape the last 15 minutes of it, just to see if I had a knee jerk reaction previously.
The actor who plays the sometimes bewildered family man and has a shaven head, portrays a muslim. There he is being comforted by, what I believe, is his convert wife. She had been portrayed as begging his attention for sex in a previous show . So far so good. The family decide to stay home and form a compact group. Watching T/V.
After being assured by his wife, he is loved, he morosely says he is going for a nap. Oh, says one of the family, you will have to help/wake XXXXX first. Suddenly the camera pans on a frazzled, comical figure of a woman. She is on a couch. Waking up and pleading. "Water, please, water. Drunken stupor I presume.
One day, certain Canadians may finally realize just what the CBC's views of them are. Or maybe they think that it is the next guy.
Just being facetious — I would hope that this man would be instantly prosecuted for this vile crime. Unless, as in many courts, heinous crimes have been excused recently because — ‘That is how they (usually the Muslims) do it in their country.’ I am hoping this is not true in Canada.
The issue of aggravation comes in during the disposition phase. Subsection 718.2 of the Criminal Code reads, in part:
A court that imposes a sentence shall also take into consideration the following principles:(a) a sentence should be increased or reduced to account for any relevant aggravating or mitigating circumstances relating to the offence or the offender, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
(i) evidence that the offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or any other similar factor,(ii) evidence that the offender, in committing the offence, abused the offender's spouse or common-law partner or child,
(iii) evidence that the offender, in committing the offence, abused a position of trust or authority in relation to the victim,
(iv) evidence that the offence was committed for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a criminal organization, or
(v) evidence that the offence was a terrorism offence
shall be deemed to be aggravating circumstances;
It Seems to me that that sub paragraphs i, ii and iii may fit this case. It remains to be seen whether the Crown will so argue in the disposition phase.
“Only a bigot would argue that every Muslim was violent or opposed to Western freedom.”
Beating your straw dog, again - eh? Does PETA know about this? ;-)
What any sane and educated person knows it that Islam is antithetical to, and irreconcilable with, Western freedoms.
Given the above, one can easily find a near infinitude of examples of what seemed like a ‘peaceful Muslim’ who went Muslim, went Jihadi, went violently murderous, ad nauseam.
Because of the core beliefs of Muslims, there can be no reliable way of predicting when a Muslim will ‘go Muslim’.
Islam Delenda Est - the only rational policy for the West.
They don't explain what it does have to do with, do they?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.