Skip to comments.New York Times Set To Nuke Hillary? (Tomorrow?)
Posted on 12/15/2007 8:27:52 AM PST by LdSentinal
Drudge has this below up with no link. But pay attention to the reporter's name:
NYT Plans Sunday Exclusive on Questionable Clinton Library donors... Reporter Don Van Natta... Developing...
He's a serious award-winning investigative journalist ... and co-author with Jeff Gerth of Her Way:
link: Prosecutors later came to believe that Hillary had padded her bills; she "wasn't guilty of [knowingly] facilitating nefarious transactions -- she was guilty of doing less work than she took credit for," Jeff Gerth and Don Van Natta Jr. explain in their 2007 biography, Her Way. Hillary herself never took refuge in this explanation.
Somehow I'm thinking Hillary isn't pleased re Her Way:
Van Natta: "We also show that she has a sort of secret side to her Senate office. We call it the mysteries of Hillaryland in the book where she actually had people on, employees of hers, people on her payroll, who she did not divulge as she was supposed to, according to Senate rules, and we have ethics experts raising questions about that."
Gerth: "She is now running for president, and we felt that people needed to understand how, how she acts in the political arena and, and use that as a basis for deciding whether she is qualified to be president or not. And, you know, in essence, we sort of found that there are two Hillarys. In, in one case, there's the well-informed, the battle-tested, the diligent senator who does her homework. And then we found another Hillary. When it comes to a bump in the road -- whether it is on Iraq or on energy policy or on the environment, where she has a problem, that she plays fast and loose with the facts, she won't admit a mistake, and she sort of, you know, retreats into a shell."
Be still my beating heart.....
Could be interesting...
Just getting the dirt out now so after she is nominated they can claim “that is old news” to excuse not covering it during the General Election.
We already know his library collected huge contributions from anti-democracy Saudis.
I do believe that’s gonna leave a mark.
I think Rush said that when the NYT turns on her it will essentially be over.
“Better put some ice on that...”
Early CHRISTMAS Present???
She began the campaign way too early, but then she didn’t ask me. It’s definitely going to be another 4 years of the GOP.
Oh please oh please oh please let Bill be standing next to her when it happens.
And now, who will the Republicans choose?
UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES???? YOWSER!!
After 8 years of Monica, Whitewater, disappearing documents, bimbo eruptions, Chinese campaign donations, probable rape, selling of technology to our enemy, dead Clinton enemies, etc., there’s probably no story out there that can bring down the Clinton dynasty.
Those that support the Clintons have already accepted the fact that they’re evil and they have choosen to overlook it.
Well, that means that we would not longer have to worry about a dangerous Stalinist,(Mrs. Clinton), and would have to start worrying about an incompetent liberal, (Ubama).
When you are no longer inevitable, all the punches pulled previously when you were inevitable may land at once.
Still this does not sound like that big a deal to me. I can not imagine implication of the donor list could be anything that the public at large could easily understand. It can not be even as simple as Chinese dishwahsers donating several months pay to he campaign?
What the ‘Times’ buildeth, the ‘Times’ will taketh away....
But the NIE says that Pinch Sulzberger is at least five years away from acquiring a nucelar weapon.