Posted on 12/18/2007 1:34:32 PM PST by pissant
Its too bad we only have two branches of one political party governing in DC today.
The few real patriots and honest people serving there have to fight the democrat branch in congress and the republican branch in the White House.
It is time the two branches merged and make way for a new party for the patriotic working class.
There is legitimate uses for eminent domain. The fence is one of them. Giving the property to a developer to increase city tax revenue is not one of them.
Somehow the govment got it backwards.
And if we are hit by the terrorists again and they came in from the southern border illegally will those who forced this reduction take responsibility?
Legitimate or not, people are opposed to it.
Legitimate or not, people are opposed to it.
Legitimate or not, people are opposed to it.
Hunter’s people (or person) should be calling all of the talking-heads. His face should be plastered on TV tonight adressing this
That's PROFOUND!!! (you should make it your tagline!)
The Fence and Iraq are alike, they both will work and the democrats can’t package the lie good enough to sell to the public.
No, that is toro mierda.
Costs too much? Please. We spend more to educate, medicate, incarcerate and feed illegal aliens every month than a double fence from Brownsville to San Diego will cost. It will pay for itself immediately in reduced spending on illegals.
"People don't want to give up their property to build it."
Non-issue. 2/3 of the border already has a 60 foot easement owned by the federal govt, taken by Teddy Roosevelt under eminent domain. The only part under contention is some of the border along the Rio Grande River, and that too can be taken by immanent domain. If a person's house can be taken because a developer wants to build a condo, the federal govt can certainly take a strip of border for national security purposes.
U.S. Constitution, Article 4 Section 4:
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,
1. The act of invading; the act of encroaching upon the rights or possessions of another; encroachment; trespass.
Contact the usual suspects!
www.house.gov
www.senate.gov
Why should we care if illegal alien criminal invaders are opposed to it?
A nation has a right to protect itself from invasion.
U.S. Constitution, Article 4 Section 4:
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,
1. The act of invading; the act of encroaching upon the rights or possessions of another; encroachment; trespass.
Well we know what Hunter and Tancredo have to say. Now lets hear what the other candidates have to say if they’ve got what it takes.
NO ONE will consider him for VP. Not the short list, not even the long list. Great man, great policies, but pragmatically speaking, NO WAY, NO HOW.
Just like they tried to package the amnesty b.s. as a great thing for all this is a lemon in the making too.
Everyone needs to review this thread
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941047/posts
Omnibus Bill Includes Border Fence-Gutting Amendment (This is outrageous!!!)
” This fence isnt going to be built. Its all political posturing. It costs too much, and people don’t want to give up their property to build it. “
Bull. It’s a pittance next to the cost of subsidizing illegals in the form of health care, lost jobs, losses due to drime, and increased welfare for the extended families of illegal aliens. Not to mention the cost of cleaning up after a terrorist attack. Where the hell is your head, man?
BUILD THE FENCE. BUILD IT WHOLE. BUILD IT NOW.
I thought Sen.hutchison a pubie is the one trying to block the fence.
I thought Sen.hutchison a pubie is the one trying to block the fence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.