Skip to comments.
A JUDGE has labelled a man's rape of a 13-year-old boy "adolescent experimentation"
Herald Sun ^
Posted on 12/19/2007 10:14:30 PM PST by bshomoic
13-year-old initiated sex, judge says
Article from: Herald Sun
December 17, 2007 01:51pm
A JUDGE has labelled a man's rape of a 13-year-old boy "adolescent experimentation" and said the teen and the perpetrator were "both victims".
Judge Michael Kelly's comments come a month after a prosecutor accused him of making inappropriate and disrespectful statements about the sexual assault victim during a plea hearing.
The Melbourne County Court was told that in March 2001 a 24-year-old man began a relationship with a 13-year-old boy.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...
TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activistcourts; activistjudge; boy; boys; childmolester; homosexualagenda; judicialtyrrany; lavendermafia; pedophile; pedophilia; playthevictim; preteen; preteens; rape; sexpositiveagenda; sexualassault; sexualizingchildren
posted on 12/19/2007 10:14:33 PM PST
My guess is the judge is a closes pedophile.
posted on 12/19/2007 10:21:57 PM PST
(Fred & Hunter '08)
I think that the Judge got off on that one.
posted on 12/19/2007 10:47:49 PM PST
(Faith is the assurance of things unseen.)
Well apparently the United States isn’t the only judiciary with kooks on the bench.
This judge needs to be removed immediately.
posted on 12/19/2007 11:07:16 PM PST
Remove this judge immediately. He does not belong on the bench period.
posted on 12/20/2007 12:15:12 AM PST
((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
No doubt that American judges (at least in CA and MA) and at the UN will adopt this
as 'International law', but extend it to 2 year olds, as is their trend.
posted on 12/20/2007 1:51:47 AM PST
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
Oh that’s nothing.
Just a few weeks ago, an Australian judge and a prosector agreed to no sentence for a group of men who gang raped a 10 year old girl. They were all members of the Aboriginal community (which is no excuse) and it was agreed that it was “naughty” and “childish experimentation” and that the girl had “probably consented.” Some of the men were aged 17, 19 and 25, and at least one had previous convictions. And they walked free from the court.
posted on 12/20/2007 2:10:56 AM PST
posted on 12/20/2007 10:01:49 AM PST
(Hunter in 2008! We choose our president, NOT the media!)
This judge is just another Clarence Darrow wannabe.
posted on 12/20/2007 10:22:56 AM PST
Mine too. Launch an investigation/sting immediately.
posted on 12/20/2007 2:37:23 PM PST
(Fred Thompson '08)
Gee, I wonder what a search of the judge's harddrive would turn up??
Creeps like this need to be thrown off the bench. Physically.
posted on 12/20/2007 2:38:19 PM PST
(Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
My guess is the judge is a closet pedophile.
Or a homosexual who preys on postpubescent boys. Either way he's wasted enough oxygen on this planet earth.
To: bshomoic; wagglebee
had this not been in Australia, i be O’Reilly would have been on the judge’s case.
posted on 12/30/2007 8:27:07 PM PST
(Merry Christmas!! and Happy New Year)
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson