Skip to comments.Hillary: Growing Old Quickly, and Without Grace ... (get Nancy Pelosi’s botox docs)
Posted on 12/20/2007 5:59:03 AM PST by IrishMike
click here to read article
I don’t know why people think that pic is so bad. There’s nothing there a couple tiny shots of Botox couldn’t cure, with a smidgeon application of spackle, and a light dusting of pancake makeup, followed by a quickie unobservable nip and tuck, with some not very strenuous full series of facial exercises, followed by a short month of sleep . . .
Bill Clinton, eat your heart out!
Maybe some of that rubber chicken on the dinner circuit had garlic in it. That would weaken her somewhat.
Hillary has lost her fire...Easy to spot. She is running on empty, and she knows it, and shows it.
I have to say this. I am 65.
This article repels me as do all the posts about this topic. They would have repelled me when I was young.
I remember my wrinkled old Granny and Grandfather and no finer more wonderful people lived. I remember my wrinkled Mother whose face was like Hillary’s is on a bad day and no better woman lived.
Wrinkles and aging are signs of a long life not something to be made fun of.
It says more about the writer than the woman. There is plenty to criticize her for but this is so disgusting to me.
Hillary's photographers are even now testing out techniques they'd need for the 2012 campaign:
According to last month's TIME she's still a smooth 39 year-old:
photo on the left is the chin of someone who has never been overweight...
Hildabeast is fat.
Is the person who took that picture alive today? We should check in.
She hasn’t been able to get down to Florida for those BOTOX treatments. Seriously if one studies he photos overe th ast two years ytou can practically track her hounddog wrinkles vs. her smooth look then back again.
This is just a much longer gap between treatments and we are seeing the real Hillary (at face value).
In that picture at least, she looks much older than 60. I would have put her at closer to 70. Other photos are not as punishing.
I think you are right. There is a real beauty in some very wrinkled faces that experienced a lifetime of smiles.
I am not one of those who believes that Hillary has always been ugly. When she was in the White House and had full-time staff available to do her hair and makeup, her appearance was generally attractive (at least on the outside). After the White House years when she would have had to pay for the services herself, she apparently dispensed with the experts. That was a big mistake! The truth is, Hillary is very ugly on the inside. It is shining out in full force now. She would be very wise to bring in a full-time team of hairdressers, makeup artists, and wardrobe consultants so that she could at least cover the ugliness of her soul with a veneer of attractiveness.
How about those thunder thighs? She cannot wear panty hose cause her legs rubbing together would set them on fire.
I don’t know why Hillary didn’t get a little “work” done way before going on the Presidential campaign trail. She wasn’t under nearly as much scrutiny and would have just looked “well rested”.
This woman behaved like a dignifed, strong leader. She did not lie. She did not talk down to people. She was a true leader and everyone knew it. hillleree does not even come close to even imagining having the character, dignity and strength of this remarkable woman Margaret Thatcher. She was respected around the world and a great and true friend to President Reagan. She was REAL.
All the talk about Botox is by people who don’t know anything about it. It can only be used for wrinkles/creases on the forehead,it makes the cheeks and jowls sag even more, so it is never used there.
She looks good in the studio under lights and in front of the camera because of light reflective makeup. That fact was brought to light here on FR.
AS far as her legs and ankles are concerned,she has my sympathy, she was born that way.
Let’s all keep talking about hillary the socialist/communist and keep this woman out of the WH.
Hillary is ugly on the inside. It is certainly starting to show on the outside. I personally believe that there are no attacks that are “out of bounds” when it comes to defeating the 3 Socialist, Islamo-apologists that are vying to be the POTUS....
This I don’t believe is an assault on age, or on any gender.
It’s political satire against a particular individual.
A person who as far as I’m concerned, is the anti Christ of my personal beliefs.
I would not take it personal, or above all seriously.
My mom and two grandmothers aged beautifully and gracefully.
That doesn’t even look like the same person.
According to last month’s TIME she’s still a smooth 39 year-old:
This month’s Time gives Vlad ‘the impaler’ Putin man of the year
I haven’t watched any of the debates....how has she looked on tv relative to this pic?
ONE THING THAT BOTH ILLARY AND MRS. THATCHER SHARE:
THEY'RE BOTH WEARING THE PROVERBIAL "FACE THAT THEY'VE EARNED."
I have never been able to understand how women can look so different at different times and it’s not just makeup.
even shoveling snow is better than that
You have hit on the TRUTH! I think we have a modern version of "Dorian Gray" starring Hillary Clinton.
Maybe she will have time during the Christmas break to get an overhaul. Then we won’t have to look at her haggard face for awhile.
If they ever existed at all.
I’m sorry that you feel that way.
If she had big ears, we’d be picking on those. Don’t you see the posts about how beautiful other older women are? We aren’t disparing their wrinkles because they are not illary. It is just that she’s losing a game she’s trying to play, and we love that.
Mrs. Thatcher is perfectly beautiful. Also, she isn’t trying to be something she’s not.
My 88 year old parents are the most beautiful sight to me in the world.
I’m wrinkled and fat; but I’m not publishing air-brushed photos of me—thin and smooth. I’m not trying to convince people that I’m something I’m not.
Our contempt for illary will spill over into any of her features. By publishing air-brushed pictures of herself as a beauty, illary sets herself up—it’s just one more area of lying.
It’s not ageism: It’s illaryism.
I ascribe it to three things: women are more flexible than men, so their faces aren't as "set" - they can quickly pick up and lose water weight at certain times that men don't - and men are way more sensitive to the way women look: like the way women are way more sensitive to the way people feel.
And, that's some major air brushing with several implants especially the neck and chin areas. Those belong to someone who is much younger and has NEVER been fat.
Check the neck and chin on this recent one... the book has obviously been photoshopped but the photo is authentic.
Yes steve, it’s the makeup.
Regarding aging, I have noticed that some Asian women postpone the real deterioration into the 70s if not 80s — and it’s not just the rice.
I am not taking it personally. I am saying it reflects badly on those who are posting, not on Hillary.
I don’t disagree.
Reminds me of a baseball glove I left out in the back yard all winter.
“Hillary Clintons better days are clearly long gone. If they ever existed at all.”
Ugly? As a kid she was so ugly that her mother put a paper bag over her head before kissing her goodnight . . . *
She looks like a .... (what’s the word)