Posted on 12/22/2007 5:37:27 AM PST by rhema
I remember the excitement. It was the week before Christmas a year ago, and I had lazily picked up my copy of Time magazine. And there it was: Time's Person of the Year for 2006 is "You."
Wow! We deserved credit, Time judged, "for seizing the reins of the global media, for founding and framing the new digital democracy, for working for nothing and beating the pros at their own game." Thanks, Time!
And thanks for not choosing the obvious alternative--Nancy Pelosi, who had led the Democratic takeover of Congress. That takeover, Time editors and many others hoped, heralded our withdrawal from Iraq. However much they may have desired that outcome, Time was lucky not to select Pelosi. In the subsequent 12 months, she and her colleagues failed to impose a defeat in Iraq. Instead, President Bush announced a new strategy and a new commander, General David Petraeus, in January 2007. And all the real achievements of this year belong to them.
We are now winning the war. To say this was not inevitable is an understatement. Even those of us who were early advocates and strong supporters of the surge, and who thought it could succeed, knew the situation had so deteriorated that success was by no means guaranteed. Two military experts told me early in 2007 that they thought the odds of success were, respectively, 1-in-3 and 1-in-4. They nonetheless supported the surge because, even at those odds, it was a gamble worth taking, so devastating would be the consequences of withdrawal and defeat. We at THE WEEKLY STANDARD thought the chances of success were better than 50-50--but that it remained a difficult proposition.
Petraeus pulled it off. The war is not over, of course. Too quick and deep a drawdown--which some in the Pentagon and elsewhere in the Bush administration are, appallingly, pushing for--could throw away the amazing success that has been achieved. Still: It is as clear as anything can be in this world, where we judge through a glass darkly, that General David H. Petraeus is, in fact, America's man of the year.
Time ludicrously chose to make Russia's ex-KGB agent-turned president Vladimir Putin its cover boy. They just couldn't make Petraeus man--oops--person of the year. Our liberal elites are so invested in a narrative of defeat and disaster in Iraq that to acknowledge the prospect of victory would be too head-wrenching and heart-rending. It would mean giving credit to George W. Bush, for one. And it would mean acknowledging American success in a war Time, and the Democratic party, and the liberal elites, had proclaimed lost.
The editors couldn't acknowledge their mugging by reality. That's fine. Nonetheless, reality exists. And the reality is that in Iraq, after mistakes and failures, thanks to the leadership of Bush, Petraeus, and General Ray Odierno--the day-to-day commander whose contributions shouldn't be overlooked--we are winning.
The reality is also this: The counterinsurgency campaign that Petraeus and Odierno conceived and executed in 2007 was as comprehensive a counterinsurgency strategy as has ever been executed. The heart of the strategy was a brilliant series of coordinated military operations throughout the entire theater. Petraeus and Odierno used conventional U.S. forces, Iraqi military and police, and Iraqi and U.S. Special Operations forces to strike enemy strongholds throughout Iraq simultaneously, while also working to protect the local populations from enemy responses. Successive operations across the theater knocked the enemy--both al Qaeda and Sunni militias, and Shia extremists--off balance and then prevented them from recovering. U.S. and Iraqi forces, supported by local citizens, chased the enemy from area to area, never allowing them the breathing space to reestablish safe havens, much less new bases. It wasn't "whack-a-mole" or "squeezing the water balloon" as some feared (and initially claimed)--it was the relentless pursuit of an increasingly defeated enemy.
That defeat has implications far beyond Iraq. In 2007, Iraq's Sunni Arabs fought with us against al Qaeda, and Iraq's Shia Arabs joined with us to fight Iranian-backed Shia militias. So much for the notion that Americans were doomed to fail in their efforts to mobilize moderate Muslims against jihadists. The progress in Iraq in 2007 represents a strategic breakthrough for the broader Middle East whose importance would be hard to overstate.
One additional point: Petraeus's counterinsurgency stands out not just for its conceptual ambition and the skill of its execution but for its humanity. There were those who argued that the U.S. military could not succeed in counterinsurgency because Americans were not tough and bloodthirsty enough. They said that brutality was essential in subduing insurgents and our humanity would be our downfall.
They were wrong. The counterinsurgency campaign of 2007 was probably the most precise, discriminate, and humane military operation ever undertaken on such a scale. Our soldiers and Marines worked hard--and took risks and even casualties--to ensure, as much as possible, that they hurt only enemies. Compared with any previous military operations of this size, they were astonishingly successful. The measure of their success lies in the fact that so many Iraqis now see American troops as friends and protectors. Petraeus and his generals have shown that Americans can fight insurgencies and win--and still be Americans. For that and so much else, he is the man of the year.
Good lord, picking “You” was the dumbest thing since sliced reindeer. Time is written by a bunch of morons.
And as much as we have criticized President Bush for some of his decisions, his own steadfastness to the mission and his constant visits to our injured soldiers is outstanding.
God bless them all.
They are not clueless. They are deliberately doing anything they can to undermine U.S. foreign policy and making their choices accordingly.
Time's Lead Over Newsweek Narrows
...Time's total paid and verified weekly circulation during the six months ended June 30 stood at 3.4 million, down 17.1% from 4.1 million during the same period last year following a reduction in January in the magazine's rate base.
The Time Man of the Year is supposed to go to the person who had the most effect on the globe, not neccessarily the most positive effect, hence past nods to Hitler and Stalin. It should be called “The Person who will help us sell the most crappy magazines” award.
Yes, as much as Gen. Petraeus deserves credit for his work, it was President Bush finally admitting his mistakes, accepting Sec. Rumsefeld's resignation, and listening to what low- to mid-level commanders (rather than the political gnneral corps) had said all along (a history book or two might have helped, too) that turned things around. It's just a shame that it took so long to get there...I understand the value of President Bush's loyalty, but a lot of good Americans lost their lives or limbs before he admitted that Sec. Romsfeld's way wasn't working.
The editors at Time knew that General Petraeus was the only obvious person but rather than expose that success they chose to expose their weakness and crawl to the liberal beat or so it would seem............
December US causualties are down even further than November....on a track to be equal to Feb 2004, which at 23, was the lowest month of the conflict.
Putin. Yeah, right.
What do you have against sliced reindeer? Taste a lot like chicken.
Gen Petraeus is the one, no doubt about that Time, probably won’t make it much longer, the doctors around here are already dropping it.
Whilst it would give good feelings to further add to the obvious comments about the mentality (or lack thereof) of Time’s editorial staff, I’ll gain simple pleasures by patiently watching their sales graph. Yup, right down there with sales of 3 1/2” floopy discs.
Yes, no one wishes to see their sons and daughters harmed, but if we did not resist 3,000 civilian deaths would also be seen as small potatoes.
It's easy to be an arm-chair quarterback, but I'm sure no one feels worse about injured soldiers than the Commander-in-Chief.
Link?
I dunno, I just got to “the worst thing since sliced...” and i blanked, reindeer popped into my head. Reindeer sausage is awesome, I just couldn’t think of anything more random ( Christmas and Santa and all that).
A better choice: WORLD.
If Time had named the General for its cover, they’d have lost half their circulation. Its who they are...
I think “sliced reindeer” would be pretty good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.